Cochrane · systematic review · CD007371
Padma 28 for intermittent claudication
Stewart, M, Morling, JR, Maxwell, H · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library
VascularAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 1 · 16.7%Very low 4 · 66.7%Low 1 · 16.7%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Padma 28 versus placebo
Population: people with symptomatic intermittent claudication
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Pain free walking distance (PFWD) Padma 28 vs placebo | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 79 participants | Ungraded |
Change in maximum walking distance (MWD) Padma 28 vs placebo | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 100 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency, publication bias |
Final value MWD Padma 28 vs placebo | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 193 participants | Very low Downgraded: imprecision, publication bias |
Adverse effects Padma 28 vs placebo | OR 1.09 [0.42, 2.83] | 4 studies · 231 participants | Very low Downgraded: imprecision, publication bias |
Final value ankle brachial index (ABI) Padma 28 vs placebo | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 56 participants | Very low Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency, publication bias |
Change in ABI Padma 28 vs placebo | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 56 participants | Very low Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency, publication bias |