Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

2,280 questions in 114 reviews · Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders

current versions
No studies 856 · 37.5%Ungraded 58 · 2.5%Very low 550 · 24.1%Low 502 · 22%Moderate 271 · 11.9%High 43 · 1.9%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
L‐arginine vs placebo
Severity of pain (assessed using a 10‐cm visual analogue scale from 0 to 10; lower score is better) · sickle cell disease
Antioxidant supplementation for sickle cell disease (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 125 participantsLow
L‐arginine vs placebo
QoL of participants living with SCD and their caregivers · sickle cell disease
Antioxidant supplementation for sickle cell disease (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
L‐arginine vs placebo
Adverse effects · sickle cell disease
Antioxidant supplementation for sickle cell disease (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 125 participantsUngraded
L‐arginine vs placebo
Frequency of hospitalization (number of days in hospital) · sickle cell disease
Antioxidant supplementation for sickle cell disease (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 125 participantsVery low
L‐arginine vs placebo
Frequency of sickle cell‐related complications · sickle cell disease
Antioxidant supplementation for sickle cell disease (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
L‐arginine vs placebo
Haemoglobin status (g/dL) · sickle cell disease
Antioxidant supplementation for sickle cell disease (2024) · Cochrane
MD 0.42 studies · 106 participantsLow
Omega‐3 vs placebo
Frequency of crisis · sickle cell disease
Antioxidant supplementation for sickle cell disease (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Vitamin C 1400 mg plus vitamin E 800 mg vs placebo
QoL of participants living with SCD and their caregivers · adults with sickle cell disease (adults with homozygous SCA or sickle beta 0 thalassaemia SCD)
Antioxidant supplementation for sickle cell disease (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Omega‐3 vs placebo
Severity of pain · sickle cell disease
Antioxidant supplementation for sickle cell disease (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Omega‐3 vs placebo
QoL of participants living with SCD and their caregivers · sickle cell disease
Antioxidant supplementation for sickle cell disease (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Omega‐3 vs placebo
Adverse effects (any adverse effect) · sickle cell disease
Antioxidant supplementation for sickle cell disease (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.05 [0.74, 1.48]1 study · 67 participantsVery low
Omega‐3 vs placebo
Frequency of hospitalization · sickle cell disease
Antioxidant supplementation for sickle cell disease (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Omega‐3 vs placebo
Frequency of sickle cell‐related complications · sickle cell disease
Antioxidant supplementation for sickle cell disease (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Omega‐3 vs placebo
Haemoglobin status · sickle cell disease
Antioxidant supplementation for sickle cell disease (2024) · Cochrane
MD 0.361 study · 67 participantsVery low
Vitamin C 1400 mg plus vitamin E 800 mg vs placebo
Adverse effects · adults with sickle cell disease (adults with homozygous SCA or sickle beta 0 thalassaemia SCD)
Antioxidant supplementation for sickle cell disease (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.56 [0.31, 1]1 study · 83 participantsVery low
Vitamin C 1400 mg plus vitamin E 800 mg vs placebo
Frequency of hospitalization · adults with sickle cell disease (adults with homozygous SCA or sickle beta 0 thalassaemia SCD)
Antioxidant supplementation for sickle cell disease (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Vitamin C 1400 mg plus vitamin E 800 mg vs placebo
Frequency of sickle cell‐related complications: acute chest syndrome · adults with sickle cell disease (adults with homozygous SCA or sickle beta 0 thalassaemia SCD)
Antioxidant supplementation for sickle cell disease (2024) · Cochrane
RR 2.661 study · 83 participantsVery low
Vitamin C 1400 mg plus vitamin E 800 mg vs placebo
Haemoglobin status (g/L) · adults with sickle cell disease (adults with homozygous SCA or sickle beta 0 thalassaemia SCD)
Antioxidant supplementation for sickle cell disease (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 83 participantsVery low
Zinc vs placebo
Frequency of crisis · children and adults with sickle cell disease
Antioxidant supplementation for sickle cell disease (2024) · Cochrane
Rate ratio 0.62 [0.17, 2.29]1 study · 36 participantsLow
Zinc vs placebo
Severity of pain · children and adults with sickle cell disease
Antioxidant supplementation for sickle cell disease (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Emicizumab prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy
Annualized Bleeding Rate (ABR) ‐ All treated bleeds · people with inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 53 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Fitusiran prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy
Annualized joint Bleeding Rate (AjBR) · people with inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 57 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Fitusiran prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy
Change from baseline in total health score, Haem‐A‐QoLScale from: 0 (better) to 100 · people with inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 48 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Fitusiran prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy
Proportion with zero bleeds · people with inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
RR 12.5 [1.83, 85.38]1 study · 57 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Fitusiran prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy
All adverse events · people with inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.6 [1.08, 2.37]1 study · 60 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Fitusiran prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy
Serious adverse events · people with inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.65 [0.24, 1.78]1 study · 60 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Concizumab prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy
Annualized Bleeding Rate (ABR), All bleeds · people with inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 68 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Concizumab prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy
Annualized spontaneous Bleeding Rate (AsBR) · people with inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 78 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Concizumab prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy
Annualized joint Bleeding Rate (AjBR) · people with inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 78 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Concizumab prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy
Proportion with zero bleeds · people with inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
RR 6.05 [1.59, 23]1 study · 52 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Concizumab prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy
Change from baseline in SF‐36v2 ‐ mental component scoreScale from: 0 to 100 (better) · people with inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 26 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Emicizumab prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy
Annualized spontaneous Bleeding Rate (AsBR) · people with inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 53 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Concizumab prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy
Adverse events ‐ All adverse events · people with inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.14 [0.76, 1.7]2 studies · 78 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Concizumab prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy
Adverse events ‐ Serious adverse events · people with inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.45 [0.06, 3.38]2 studies · 78 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Emicuzimab 1.5 mg/kg weekly prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy
Annualized Bleeding Rate (ABR) ‐ All treated bleeds · people without inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 54 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Emicuzimab 1.5 mg/kg weekly prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy
Annualized joint Bleeding Rate (AjBR) · people without inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 54 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Emicuzimab 1.5 mg/kg weekly prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy
Annualized spontaneous Bleeding Rate (AsBR) · people without inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 54 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Emicuzimab 1.5 mg/kg weekly prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy
Proportion of participants with zero bleeds · people without inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
RR 19 [1.21, 298.4]1 study · 54 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Emicuzimab 1.5 mg/kg weekly prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy
Change in Haem‐A‐QoL total score Scale from: 0 (better) to 100 · people without inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 47 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Emicuzimab 1.5 mg/kg weekly prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy
All adverse events · people without inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
RR 2.83 [1.47, 5.47]1 study · 54 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Emicuzimab 1.5 mg/kg weekly prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy
Serious adverse events · people without inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.5 [0.03, 7.54]1 study · 54 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Emicuzimab 3.0 mg/kg bi‐weekly prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy
Annualized Bleeding Rate (ABR) ‐ All treated bleeds · people without inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 53 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Emicizumab prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy
Annualized joint Bleeding Rate (AjBR) · people with inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 53 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Emicuzimab 3.0 mg/kg bi‐weekly prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy
Annualized joint Bleeding Rate (AjBR) · people without inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 53 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Emicuzimab 3.0 mg/kg bi‐weekly prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy
Annualized spontaneous Bleeding Rate (AsBR) · people without inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 53 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Emicuzimab 3.0 mg/kg bi‐weekly prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy
Proportion of participants with zero bleeds · people without inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
RR 15.31 [0.96, 242.76]1 study · 53 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Emicuzimab 3.0 mg/kg bi‐weekly prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy
Change in total score, Haem‐A‐QoLScale from: 0 (better) to 100 · people without inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 53 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Emicuzimab 3.0 mg/kg bi‐weekly prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy
All adverse events · people without inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.71 [1.06, 2.77]1 study · 53 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Emicuzimab 3.0 mg/kg bi‐weekly prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy
Serious adverse events · people without inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.54 [0.17, 13.79]1 study · 53 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg once weekly vs emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg every 2 weeks
Annualized Bleeding Rate (ABR) ‐ All treated bleeds · people without inhibitors
Non‐clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 71 participantsModerate