Search

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

492 questions · 535 findings · 56 reviews · Hypertension

No studies found 37 · 6.9%GRADE not reported 34 · 6.4%Very low 91 · 17%Low 161 · 30.1%Moderate 136 · 25.4%High 76 · 14.2%

First‐line thiazides vs calcium channel blockers

Total serious adverse events Duration: 1.75 to 3 years · patients with hypertension

First‐line thiazides showed no clear difference in total serious adverse events Duration: 1.75 to 3 years compared with first‐line calcium channel blockers (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

mg/day LDL cholesterol · participants with normal or abnormal lipid profiles

The intervention showed no clear difference in mg/day LDL cholesterol (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

mg/day LDL cholesterol · participants with normal or abnormal lipid profiles

The intervention showed no clear difference in mg/day LDL cholesterol (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

mg/day LDL cholesterol · participants with normal or abnormal lipid profiles

The intervention showed no clear difference in mg/day LDL cholesterol (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

mg/day LDL cholesterol · participants with normal or abnormal lipid profiles

The intervention showed no clear difference in mg/day LDL cholesterol (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Pravastatin 10 to 80 mg/day (6 to 156 weeks) · participants with normal or abnormal lipid profiles

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

WDAEs · participants with normal or abnormal lipid profiles

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes WDAEs (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review