Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

303 questions · 322 findings · 45 reviews

No studies found 31 · 9.6%GRADE not reported 22 · 6.8%Very low 99 · 30.7%Low 95 · 29.5%Moderate 68 · 21.1%High 7 · 2.2%

Superselective neck dissection vs Elective selective neck dissection

Locoregional recurrence · Adults with oral cavity cancer (tongue or floor of mouth) and clinically negative neck nodes
1 finding from 1 review

Non-selective carious tissue removal and conventional restoration (CR) vs Selective carious tissue removal (selective excavation, SE)

Failure of therapy · Children and/or adults with permanent or primary teeth, vital (sensitive) pulps, and cavitated or dentine carious lesions conventionally…

It is very uncertain whether non-selective carious tissue removal and conventional restoration (CR) changes failure of therapy compared with selective carious tissue removal (selective excavation, SE) (very low certainty).

3 findings from 1 review

Non-selective carious tissue removal and conventional restoration (CR) vs Selective carious tissue removal (selective excavation, SE)

Lesion progression · Children and/or adults with permanent or primary teeth, vital (sensitive) pulps, and cavitated or dentine carious lesions conventionally…
1 finding from 1 review

Autologous myeloablative selective HSCT vs cyclophosphamide

Skin thickness – mRSS Scale 0–51 in which a higher number is worse skin thickening · people with systemic sclerosis

Autologous myeloablative selective HSCT probably leads to higher skin thickness – mRSS Scale 0–51 in which a higher number is worse… compared with cyclophosphamide (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review