Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

28 questions · 28 findings · 2 reviews · Back and Neck

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 1 · 3.6%Very low 10 · 35.7%Low 14 · 50%Moderate 2 · 7.1%High 1 · 3.6%

Summary of findings: unilateral laminotomy vs conventional laminectomy

Incidence of perioperative complications · patients with lumbar stenosis

Summary of findings: unilateral laminotomy showed no clear difference in incidence of perioperative complications compared with conventional laminectomy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: unilateral laminotomy vs conventional laminectomy

Satisfactory recovery Bilateral laminotomy compared with conventional laminectomy Satisfactory recovery was defined as 'good' or 'excellent' self‐perceived recovery · patients with lumbar stenosis

Summary of findings: unilateral laminotomy showed no clear difference in satisfactory recovery Unilateral laminotomy compared with… compared with conventional laminectomy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: unilateral laminotomy vs conventional laminectomy

VAS leg (0 to 10) Unilateral laminotomy compared with conventional laminectomy · patients with lumbar stenosis

Summary of findings: unilateral laminotomy showed no clear difference in VAS leg (0 to 10) Unilateral laminotomy compared with conventional… compared with conventional laminectomy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: split‐spinous process laminotomy vs conventional laminectomy

Satisfactory recovery Bilateral laminotomy compared with conventional laminectomy Satisfactory recovery was defined as 'good' or 'excellent' self‐perceived recovery · patients with lumbar stenosis

Summary of findings: split‐spinous process laminotomy led to lower satisfactory recovery Split‐spinous process laminotomy compared with… compared with conventional laminectomy; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: split‐spinous process laminotomy vs conventional laminectomy

VAS leg (0 to 10) Split‐spinous process laminotomy compared with conventional laminectomy · patients with lumbar stenosis

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: split‐spinous process laminotomy changes VAS leg (0 to 10) Split‐spinous process laminotomy compared with… compared with conventional laminectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: split‐spinous process laminotomy vs conventional laminectomy

VAS back (0 to 10) Unilateral laminotomy compared with conventional laminectomy · patients with lumbar stenosis

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: split‐spinous process laminotomy changes VAS back (0 to 10) Unilateral laminotomy compared with conventional… compared with conventional laminectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: split‐spinous process laminotomy vs conventional laminectomy

Incidence of postoperative instability · patients with lumbar stenosis

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: split‐spinous process laminotomy changes incidence of postoperative instability compared with conventional laminectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: split‐spinous process laminotomy vs conventional laminectomy

Incidence of perioperative complications · patients with lumbar stenosis

Summary of findings: split‐spinous process laminotomy showed no clear difference in incidence of perioperative complications compared with conventional laminectomy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review