Satisfactory recovery Bilateral laminotomy compared with conventional laminectomy Satisfactory recovery was defined as 'good' or 'excellent' self‐perceived recovery · patients with lumbar stenosis
Summary of findings: bilateral laminotomy may leads to higher satisfactory recovery Bilateral laminotomy compared with… compared with conventional laminectomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
VAS leg (0 to 10) Bilateral laminotomy compared with conventional laminectomy · patients with lumbar stenosis
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: bilateral laminotomy changes VAS leg (0 to 10) Bilateral laminotomy compared with conventional… compared with conventional laminectomy (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
VAS back (0 to 10) Unilateral laminotomy compared with conventional laminectomy · patients with lumbar stenosis
Summary of findings: bilateral laminotomy showed no clear difference in VAS back (0 to 10) Unilateral laminotomy compared with conventional… compared with conventional laminectomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Incidence of postoperative instability · patients with lumbar stenosis
Summary of findings: bilateral laminotomy may leads to lower incidence of postoperative instability compared with conventional laminectomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Incidence of perioperative complications · patients with lumbar stenosis
Summary of findings: bilateral laminotomy showed no clear difference in incidence of perioperative complications compared with conventional laminectomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
VAS back (0 to 10) Unilateral laminotomy compared with conventional laminectomy · patients with lumbar stenosis
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: unilateral laminotomy changes VAS back (0 to 10) Unilateral laminotomy compared with conventional… compared with conventional laminectomy (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Incidence of postoperative instability · patients with lumbar stenosis
Summary of findings: unilateral laminotomy showed no clear difference in incidence of postoperative instability compared with conventional laminectomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Incidence of perioperative complications · patients with lumbar stenosis
Summary of findings: unilateral laminotomy showed no clear difference in incidence of perioperative complications compared with conventional laminectomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Satisfactory recovery Bilateral laminotomy compared with conventional laminectomy Satisfactory recovery was defined as 'good' or 'excellent' self‐perceived recovery · patients with lumbar stenosis
Summary of findings: unilateral laminotomy showed no clear difference in satisfactory recovery Unilateral laminotomy compared with… compared with conventional laminectomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
VAS leg (0 to 10) Unilateral laminotomy compared with conventional laminectomy · patients with lumbar stenosis
Summary of findings: unilateral laminotomy showed no clear difference in VAS leg (0 to 10) Unilateral laminotomy compared with conventional… compared with conventional laminectomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Satisfactory recovery Bilateral laminotomy compared with conventional laminectomy Satisfactory recovery was defined as 'good' or 'excellent' self‐perceived recovery · patients with lumbar stenosis
Summary of findings: split‐spinous process laminotomy led to lower satisfactory recovery Split‐spinous process laminotomy compared with… compared with conventional laminectomy; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
VAS leg (0 to 10) Split‐spinous process laminotomy compared with conventional laminectomy · patients with lumbar stenosis
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: split‐spinous process laminotomy changes VAS leg (0 to 10) Split‐spinous process laminotomy compared with… compared with conventional laminectomy (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
VAS back (0 to 10) Unilateral laminotomy compared with conventional laminectomy · patients with lumbar stenosis
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: split‐spinous process laminotomy changes VAS back (0 to 10) Unilateral laminotomy compared with conventional… compared with conventional laminectomy (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Incidence of postoperative instability · patients with lumbar stenosis
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: split‐spinous process laminotomy changes incidence of postoperative instability compared with conventional laminectomy (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low
Incidence of perioperative complications · patients with lumbar stenosis
Summary of findings: split‐spinous process laminotomy showed no clear difference in incidence of perioperative complications compared with conventional laminectomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review