Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

28 questions · 28 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 16 · 57.1%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 6 · 21.4%Low 6 · 21.4%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Routine vaginal examination vs routine ultrasound

Admission to neonatal intensive care unit · pregnant women, multiparous, in labour at term

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Routine vaginal examinations compared to other methods for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Routine vaginal examination vs routine ultrasound

Maternal pain (primary outcome)№ of participants: (0 studies) · pregnant women, multiparous, in labour at term

1 finding from 1 review

Routine vaginal examinations compared to other methods for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Low

Routine 4‐hourly vaginal examinations vs routine 2‐hourly vaginal examinations

Positive birth experience (primary outcome)№ of participants: (0 studies) · primiparous pregnant women in labour at term

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Routine vaginal examinations compared to other methods for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Routine 4‐hourly vaginal examinations vs routine 2‐hourly vaginal examinations

Augmentation of labour (primary outcome)№ of participants: (0 studies) · primiparous pregnant women in labour at term

It is very uncertain whether routine 4‐hourly vaginal examinations changes augmentation of labour (primary outcome)№ of participants: 109(1 RCT) compared with routine 2‐hourly vaginal examinations (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Routine vaginal examinations compared to other methods for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.97 [0.6, 1.57]
Studies not reported
Very low

Routine 4‐hourly vaginal examinations vs routine 2‐hourly vaginal examinations

Chorioamnionitis · primiparous pregnant women in labour at term

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Routine vaginal examinations compared to other methods for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Routine 4‐hourly vaginal examinations vs routine 2‐hourly vaginal examinations

Neonatal infection · primiparous pregnant women in labour at term

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Routine vaginal examinations compared to other methods for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Routine 4‐hourly vaginal examinations vs routine 2‐hourly vaginal examinations

Admission to neonatal intensive care unit · primiparous pregnant women in labour at term

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Routine vaginal examinations compared to other methods for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Routine 4‐hourly vaginal examinations vs routine 2‐hourly vaginal examinations

Maternal pain (primary outcome)№ of participants: (0 studies) · primiparous pregnant women in labour at term

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Routine vaginal examinations compared to other methods for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found