(ITS) Safe blood collection systems vs regular systems
- Devices for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted2 studies · 2 participantsVery low
It is very uncertain whether (RCT) Safe intravenous systems changes needlestick injuries compared with regular systems (very low certainty).
(RCT) Safe intravenous systems may leads to higher incidences of blood contamination ‐ Active systems compared with regular systems (low certainty).
(RCT) Safe intravenous systems showed no clear difference in incidences of blood contamination ‐ Passive systems compared with regular systems (low certainty).
(RCT) Safe intravenous systems may leads to lower incidence of blood leakage ‐ Active systems compared with regular systems (low certainty).
Double gloves probably leads to lower inner glove perforations Water leak test or air test compared with single gloves (moderate certainty).
Double gloves showed no clear difference in dexterity: outer glove perforations ‐ number of perforations Water… compared with single gloves (moderate certainty).
Blunt needles leads to lower glove perforations per surgeon per operation compared with sharp needles (high certainty).