Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

40 questions · 41 findings · 6 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 9 · 22%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 21 · 51.2%Low 5 · 12.2%Moderate 6 · 14.6%High 0 · 0%

Parent training vs control

Crying time at completion Measured in: minutes/day · infants with colic defined by recognised criteria

1 finding from 1 review

Parent training programmes for managing infantile colic 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 157 participants
Low

Parent training vs control

Adverse effects (not reported) · infants with colic defined by recognised criteria

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Parent training programmes for managing infantile colic 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Parent training vs treatment

Safe home practices · people with intellectual disability

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Parent training vs treatment

Recognising dangers · people with intellectual disability

1 finding from 1 review

Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 30 participants
Very low

Parent training vs treatment

Identifying precautions · people with intellectual disability

1 finding from 1 review

Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 30 participants
Very low

Parent training vs treatment

Home precautions · people with intellectual disability

2 findings from 1 review

Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 30 participants
Very low
Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 22 participants
Very low

Parent training vs treatment

Child health comprehension · people with intellectual disability

1 finding from 1 review

Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 30 participants
Very low

Parent training vs treatment

Symptom recognition · people with intellectual disability

1 finding from 1 review

Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 30 participants
Very low

Parent training vs treatment

Maternal‐child interaction · people with intellectual disability

1 finding from 1 review

Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 40 participants
Very low

Mindfulness‐enhanced parent training vs no‐treatment, waitlist, or attentional control

Child emotional and behavioural adjustment; postintervention · parents of children between the ages of 0 and 18 years

1 finding from 1 review

Mindfulness‐enhanced parenting programmes for improving the psychosocial outcomes of children (0 to 18 years) and… 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 270 participants
Very low

Mindfulness‐enhanced parent training vs no‐treatment, waitlist, or attentional control

Adverse effects · parents of children between the ages of 0 and 18 years

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Mindfulness‐enhanced parenting programmes for improving the psychosocial outcomes of children (0 to 18 years) and… 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Mindfulness‐enhanced parent training vs no‐treatment, waitlist, or attentional control

Measures of self‐compassion · parents of children between the ages of 0 and 18 years

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Mindfulness‐enhanced parenting programmes for improving the psychosocial outcomes of children (0 to 18 years) and… 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Video‐feedback intervention to promote positive parenting for parents with learning difficulties (VIPP‐LD) vs treatment

Parent‐child interaction · 85 parents (83 mothers and 2 fathers) with intellectual disabilities

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Video‐feedback intervention to promote positive parenting for parents with learning difficulties (VIPP‐LD) vs treatment

Parenting stress: child domain · 85 parents (83 mothers and 2 fathers) with intellectual disabilities

1 finding from 1 review

Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 85 participants
Moderate

Video‐feedback intervention to promote positive parenting for parents with learning difficulties (VIPP‐LD) vs treatment

Parenting stress: parent domain · 85 parents (83 mothers and 2 fathers) with intellectual disabilities

1 finding from 1 review

Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 85 participants
Moderate

Video‐feedback intervention to promote positive parenting for parents with learning difficulties (VIPP‐LD) vs treatment

Parental stress · 85 parents (83 mothers and 2 fathers) with intellectual disabilities

1 finding from 1 review

Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 85 participants
Moderate

SOCIAL SKILLS vs no intervention

Parent‐rated social skills Measured by: Social Skills Rating Scale; Weiss Functional Impairment Scale: Social Acitivities Domain (parent‐rated); Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire: Prosocial Behavior Subscale; Social Skills Improvement System · Children and adolescents with ADHD

1 finding from 1 review

Social skills training for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children aged 5 to 18 years 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
15 studies · 1609 participants
Very low

SOCIAL SKILLS vs no intervention

Parent‐rated general behaviour Measured by: Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (parent‐rated; total scores); Conners Behavior Rating Scale: Aggressiveness Index; Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale; Behavior Rating Inventory of Execut... · Children and adolescents with ADHD

1 finding from 1 review

Social skills training for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children aged 5 to 18 years 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
995 participants
Very low

SOCIAL SKILLS vs no intervention

ADHD symptoms · Children and adolescents with ADHD

1 finding from 1 review

Social skills training for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children aged 5 to 18 years 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
11 studies · 1206 participants
Very low

Tricyclic antidepressants vs behavioural interventions

Number not achieving 14 consecutive dry nights at the end of treatment ‐ imipramine vs 3 step therapy (reassurance, retention control training + wakening, parental involvement) · children with nocturnal enuresis

Tricyclics may leads to higher number not achieving 14 consecutive dry nights at the end of… compared with behavioural interventions (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Tricyclic and related drugs for nocturnal enuresis in children 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.83 [1.08, 3.12]
1 study · 72 participants
Low