Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

86 questions · 86 findings · 9 reviews · Haematology

No studies found 20 · 23.3%GRADE not reported 2 · 2.3%Very low 13 · 15.1%Low 24 · 27.9%Moderate 23 · 26.7%High 4 · 4.7%

Remdesivir and standard care vs placebo or usual care

In‐hospital mortality at up to day 150 · hospitalised individuals with COVID‐19 (moderate to severe disease)

Remdesivir and standard care showed no clear difference in in‐hospital mortality at up to day 150 compared with standard care (plus/minus placebo) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Remdesivir and standard care vs placebo or usual care

Clinical improvement: discharged alive ( · hospitalised individuals with COVID‐19 (moderate to severe disease)

Remdesivir and standard care probably leads to higher clinical improvement: participants alive and ready to be discharged… compared with standard care (plus/minus placebo) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Remdesivir and standard care vs placebo or usual care

Clinical worsening: new need for invasive mechanical ventilation or death · hospitalised individuals with COVID‐19 (moderate to severe disease)

Remdesivir and standard care probably leads to lower clinical worsening: time to new need for invasive mechanical… compared with standard care (plus/minus placebo) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Remdesivir and standard care vs placebo or usual care

Adverse events: all grades · hospitalised individuals with COVID‐19 (moderate to severe disease)

Remdesivir and standard care showed no clear difference in adverse events (any grade) at up to day 28 compared with standard care (plus/minus placebo) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Remdesivir and standard care vs placebo or usual care

Serious adverse events at up to day 28 · hospitalised individuals with COVID‐19 (moderate to severe disease)

Remdesivir and standard care showed no clear difference in serious adverse events at up to day 28 compared with standard care (plus/minus placebo) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

28‐day all‐cause mortality · hospitalised adults with COVID‐19 (moderate to severe disease)

The intervention probably leads to lower 28‐day all‐cause mortality (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Worsening up to day 28: participants with new need for invasive mechanical ventilation or death · hospitalised adults with COVID‐19 (moderate to severe disease)

The intervention showed no clear difference in worsening up to day 28: participants with new need for invasive… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Improvement up to day 28: participants discharged alive · hospitalised adults with COVID‐19 (moderate to severe disease)

The intervention showed no clear difference in improvement up to day 28: participants discharged alive (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Thrombotic events at longest · hospitalised adults with COVID‐19 (moderate to severe disease)

The intervention showed no clear difference in thrombotic events at longest (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Serious adverse events at longest · hospitalised adults with COVID‐19 (moderate to severe disease)

The intervention showed no clear difference in serious adverse events at longest (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Adverse events during study treatment · hospitalised adults with COVID‐19 (moderate to severe disease)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Major bleeding events at longest · hospitalised adults with COVID‐19 (moderate to severe disease)

The intervention probably leads to higher major bleeding events at longest (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

RBD‐specific polyclonal F(ab') 2 fragments of equine antibodies (EpAbs) vs saline placebo

Clinical improvement: participants discharged from hospital ‐ not reported · individuals with moderate or severe COVID‐19

RBD‐specific polyclonal F(ab') 2 fragments of equine antibodies… showed no clear difference in improvement of clinical status (number of participants discharged… compared with saline placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

RBD‐specific polyclonal F(ab') 2 fragments of equine antibodies (EpAbs) vs saline placebo

Adverse events: all grades · individuals with moderate or severe COVID‐19

RBD‐specific polyclonal F(ab') 2 fragments of equine antibodies… showed no clear difference in adverse events of any grade (by day 28) compared with saline placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

RBD‐specific polyclonal F(ab') 2 fragments of equine antibodies (EpAbs) vs saline placebo

Serious adverse events (by day 28) · individuals with moderate or severe COVID‐19

RBD‐specific polyclonal F(ab') 2 fragments of equine antibodies… showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (by day 28) compared with saline placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Hyperimmune immunoglobulin from human plasma vs saline placebo

Worsening of clinical status at day 28 (data only available for clinical status worsened on day 7) · individuals with moderate or severe COVID‐19

It is very uncertain whether hyperimmune immunoglobulin from human plasma changes worsening of clinical status at day 28 (data only available for… compared with saline placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review