Symptomatic catheter‐related thrombosis measured as asymptomatic catheter‐related thrombosis (up to 3 months) · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters
It is very uncertain whether low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) changes symptomatic catheter‐related thrombosis measured as asymptomatic… compared with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pulmonary embolism · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) showed no clear difference in pulmonary embolism (up to 3 months) compared with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Major bleeding · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters
It is very uncertain whether low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) changes major bleeding (up to 3 months) compared with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Minor bleeding · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters
It is very uncertain whether low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) changes minor bleeding (up to 3 months) compared with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Thrombocytopenia (up to 3 months)n · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) probably leads to higher thrombocytopenia (up to 3 months)n compared with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Symptomatic catheter‐related thrombosis (up to 3 months) · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) probably leads to lower symptomatic catheter‐related thrombosis (up to 3 months) compared with no LMWH (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Symptomatic catheter‐related thrombosis measured as asymptomatic catheter‐related thrombosis (up to 3 months) · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters
It is very uncertain whether low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) changes symptomatic catheter‐related thrombosis measured as asymptomatic… compared with no LMWH (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Major bleeding · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters
It is very uncertain whether low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) changes major bleeding (up to 3 months) compared with no LMWH (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Minor bleeding · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) showed no clear difference in minor bleeding (up to 3 months) compared with no LMWH (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Antibiotic versus heparin only lock/flush solution: catheter‐related infections · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) showed no clear difference in catheter‐related infection (up to 3 months) compared with no LMWH (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Thrombocytopenia · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) showed no clear difference in thrombocytopenia (up to 3 months) compared with no LMWH (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Major lower GI bleeding · patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism
It is very uncertain whether direct oral anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis changes major lower GI bleeding compared with low molecular weight heparin secondary prophylaxis (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Minor lower GI bleeding · patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism
Direct oral anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis showed no clear difference in minor lower GI bleeding compared with low molecular weight heparin secondary prophylaxis (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
All‐cause mortality · ambulatory patients with multiple myeloma receiving immunomodulatory agents
It is very uncertain whether aspirin (ASA) changes all‐cause mortality compared with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (very low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Symptomatic DVT · ambulatory patients with multiple myeloma receiving immunomodulatory agents
It is very uncertain whether aspirin (ASA) changes symptomatic deep vein thrombosis compared with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (very low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Pulmonary embolism · ambulatory patients with multiple myeloma receiving immunomodulatory agents
It is very uncertain whether aspirin (ASA) changes pulmonary embolism compared with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (very low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Major bleeding · ambulatory patients with multiple myeloma receiving immunomodulatory agents
It is very uncertain whether aspirin (ASA) changes major bleeding compared with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (very low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Minor bleeding · ambulatory patients with multiple myeloma receiving immunomodulatory agents
It is very uncertain whether aspirin (ASA) changes minor bleeding compared with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Minor bleeding ‐ not reported · ambulatory patients with multiple myeloma receiving immunomodulatory agents
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
All‐cause mortality · ambulatory patients with multiple myeloma receiving immunomodulatory agents
It is very uncertain whether vitamin K antagonist (VKA) changes all‐cause mortality compared with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (very low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review