Intervention not reported
Mobilityd ‐ overall analysis Using different mobility scales: mPPT (range 0 to 36), POMA (range 0 to 30), SPPB (range 0 to 12), PPME (range 0 to 12). A higher score indicates better mobility. · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention leads to higher mobilityd ‐ overall analysis Using different mobility scales: mPPT… (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Walking speedg ‐ overall analysis Measured using metres/second (m/s) and metres/minute (m/min). A higher score indicates faster walking. · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention leads to higher walking speedg ‐ overall analysis Measured using metres/second (m/s)… (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Functioningi ‐ overall analysis Using different functioning scales: FSQ (range 0 to 36), BI (range 0 to 100), AM‐PAC daily activity (range 9 to 101), COPM (range 0 to 20), LEFS (range 0 to 80), NEADL (range 0 to 66). A higher score indicates bette... · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention leads to higher functioningi ‐ overall analysis Using different functioning scales:… (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
HRQoL using EQ‐ 5D (range 0 to 1), SF‐36 (range 0 to 100), SF‐12 (range 0 to 100), and WHOQOL‐BREF (range 0 to 130). A higher score indicates better quality of life. · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention showed no clear difference in HRQoL using EQ‐ 5D (range 0 to 1), SF‐36 (range 0 to 100), SF‐12… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Mobility scales, using different scales: SPPB (range 0 to 12), PPME (range 0 to 12). A higher score indicates better mobility. · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention leads to higher mobility scales, using different scales: SPPB (range 0 to 12), PPME… (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Walking speedg ‐ overall analysis Measured using metres/second (m/s) and metres/minute (m/min). A higher score indicates faster walking. · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention showed no clear difference in walking speedg ‐ overall analysis Measured using metres/second (m/s)… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Functioningi ‐ overall analysis Using different scales: mBI (range 0 to 20), BI (range 0 to 100), FIM (range 18 to 126), NEADL (range 0 to 66). A higher score indicates better functioning. · adults following hip fracture surgery
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes functioningi ‐ overall analysis Using different scales: mBI (range 0… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
HRQoL Using EQ‐5D (range 0 to 1) and HOOS (range 0 to 100). A higher score indicates better quality of life. · adults following hip fracture surgery
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes HRQoL Using EQ‐5D (range 0 to 1) and HOOS (range 0 to 100). A higher… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Mobility scales, using different mobility scales: MILA (range 0 to 36), EMS (range 0 to 20), BBS (range 0 to 56), PPME (range 0 to 12), Koval (range 1 to 7). Higher values indicate better mobility (except MILA and Koval, where scale was inverted f... · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention probably leads to higher mobility scales, using different mobility scales: MILA (range 0 to… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
PROMs (long term) Measurements: SMFA (range 0–100, higher values indicate worse function) KSS (range 0–100, where higher values indicate better function) · adults with fractures of the distal femur
1 finding from 1 review
QoL · adults with fractures of the distal femur
2 findings from 1 review
HRQoL: using EQ‐5D (range from 0 to 1; higher values indicate better quality of life · adults with displaced and undisplaced hip fractures
1 finding from 1 review
Functional status, early (within 4 months): using HHS (range from 0 to 100) and Johansen hip score (range from 0 to 100); higher scores indicate better function · adults with displaced and undisplaced hip fractures
1 finding from 1 review
HRQoL: using EQ‐5D (range from 0 to 1; higher values indicate better quality of life · adults with displaced and undisplaced hip fractures
1 finding from 1 review
Functional status, early (within 4 months): using HHS (range from 0 to 100) and Johansen hip score (range from 0 to 100); higher scores indicate better function · adults with displaced and undisplaced hip fractures
1 finding from 1 review
HRQoL: using EQ‐5D (range from 0 to 1; higher values indicate better quality of life · adults with displaced and undisplaced hip fractures
1 finding from 1 review
'Poor outcome' (dead or moved to higher level of care or unable to walk) · Older people undergoing hip fracture aftercare
It is very uncertain whether supported discharge and multidisciplinary home rehabilitation changes 'Poor outcome' (dead or moved to higher level of care or unable to… compared with usual care: mainly (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Permanent move to higher level of care (hostel, nursing home, sheltered housing) · Older people undergoing hip fracture aftercare
It is very uncertain whether supported discharge and multidisciplinary home rehabilitation changes permanent move to higher level of care (hostel, nursing home,… compared with usual care: mainly (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HRQoL: using EQ‐5D (range from 0 to 1; higher values indicate better quality of life · older adults (> 60 years of age) with intracapsular hip fractures; most fractures in the included studies were displaced
1 finding from 1 review
HRQoL: using EQ‐5D (range from 0 to 1; higher values indicate better quality of life · older adults (> 60 years of age) with intracapsular hip fractures; most fractures in the included studies were displaced
1 finding from 1 review