Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

62 questions · 66 findings · 5 reviews

No studies found 11 · 16.7%GRADE not reported 23 · 34.8%Very low 8 · 12.1%Low 12 · 18.2%Moderate 11 · 16.7%High 1 · 1.5%

Gonadotropins with GnRH agonists vs gonadotropins alone

Multiple pregnancy rate · intrauterine insemination (IUI) in women with infertility

It is very uncertain whether gonadotropins with GnRH agonists changes multiple pregnancy rate per couple compared with gonadotropins alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Gonadotropins with GnRH agonists vs gonadotropins alone

Clinical pregnancy rate · intrauterine insemination (IUI) in women with infertility

It is very uncertain whether gonadotropins with GnRH agonists changes clinical pregnancy rate per couple compared with gonadotropins alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens vs GnRH antagonists

Live birth or ongoing pregnancy · assisted reproduction technology cycles
3 findings from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens vs GnRH antagonists

Total oocytes ‐ Normoresponders ‐ Donor oocytes ‐ Early phase stimulation protocol ‐ Fresh embryo transfer (MPA 10 mg/day versus GnRH antagonists) · assisted reproduction technology cycles
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens vs GnRH antagonists

Total oocytes ‐ PCOS (high‐responders) ‐ Own oocytes ‐ Early phase stimulation protocol ‐ Frozen embryo transfer (micronised progesterone 100 mg/day versus GnRH antagonists) · assisted reproduction technology cycles
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens vs GnRH antagonists

MII oocytes ‐ PCOS (high‐responders) ‐ Own oocytes ‐ Early phase stimulation protocol ‐ Frozen embryo transfer (micronised progesterone 100 mg/day versus GnRH antagonists) · assisted reproduction technology cycles
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens vs GnRH antagonists

Duration of stimulation (days) ‐ PCOS (high‐responders) ‐ Own oocytes ‐ Early phase stimulation protocol ‐ Frozen embryo transfer (micronised progesterone 100 mg/day versus GnRH antagonists) · assisted reproduction technology cycles
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens vs GnRH antagonists

Total dose of gonadotropins (IU) ‐ Normoresponders ‐ Donor oocytes ‐ Early ophase stimulation protocol ‐ Fresh embryo transfer (MPA 10 mg/day versus GnRH antagonists · assisted reproduction technology cycles
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens vs GnRH antagonists

Oocyte pick‐up cancellation · assisted reproduction technology cycles

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens showed no clear difference in oocyte pick‐up cancellation ‐ total compared with gnRH antagonists (low certainty).

3 findings from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens vs GnRH antagonists

Total dose of gonadotropins (IU) ‐ PCOS (high‐responders) ‐ Own oocytes ‐ Early phase stumulation protocol ‐ Frozen embryo transfer (micronised progesterone 100 mg/day versus GnRH antagonists) · assisted reproduction technology cycles
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens vs GnRH antagonists

Moderate or severe OHSS ‐ Normoresponders ‐ Donor oocytes ‐ Early phase stimulation protocol ‐ Fresh embryo transfer (MPA 10 mg/day versus GnRH antagonists) · assisted reproduction technology cycles
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens vs GnRH antagonists

Live birth or ongoing pregnancy sensitivity analysis ‐ PCOS (high‐responders) ‐ own oocytes ‐ early phase stimulation protocol ‐ frozen embryo transfer (micronised progesterone 100 mg/day versus GnRH antagonists) · assisted reproduction technology cycles

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens showed no clear difference in live birth or ongoing pregnancy sensitivity analysis ‐ PCOS… compared with gnRH antagonists; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens vs GnRH antagonists

Oocyte pick‐up cancellation sensitivity analysis ‐ Normoresponders (MPA 10 mg versus GnRH antagonists) ‐ Donor oocytes ‐ Early phase stimulation protocol ‐ Fresh embryo transfer · assisted reproduction technology cycles

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens showed no clear difference in oocyte pick‐up cancellation sensitivity analysis ‐ Normoresponders… compared with gnRH antagonists; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens vs GnRH antagonists

Oocyte pick‐up cancellation sensitivity analysis ‐ Normoresponders (micronised progesterone 200 mg versus GnRH antagonists) ‐ Own oocytes ‐ Early phase stimulation protocol ‐ Fresh embryo transfer · assisted reproduction technology cycles

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens showed no clear difference in oocyte pick‐up cancellation sensitivity analysis ‐ Normoresponders… compared with gnRH antagonists; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens vs GnRH antagonists

Oocyte pick‐up cancellation sensitivity analysis ‐ PCOS (high‐responders)(micronised progesterone 100 mg versus GnRH antagonists) ‐ Own oocytes ‐ Early phase stimulation protocol ‐ Frozen embryo transfer · assisted reproduction technology cycles

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens showed no clear difference in oocyte pick‐up cancellation sensitivity analysis ‐ PCOS… compared with gnRH antagonists; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens vs GnRH antagonists

Clinical pregnancy · assisted reproduction technology cycles

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens showed no clear difference in clinical pregnancy ‐ Poor‐responders (MPA 10 mg versus GnRH… compared with gnRH antagonists (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review