Enteral nutrition may leads to lower all‐cause mortality compared with no intervention (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether enteral nutrition changes systemic inflammatory response syndrome compared with no intervention (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether enteral nutrition changes organ failure compared with no intervention (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether enteral nutrition changes adverse events compared with no intervention (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether fibre‐enriched enteral nutrition changes all‐cause mortality compared with control (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether fibre‐enriched enteral nutrition changes systemic inflammatory response syndrome compared with control (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether fibre‐enriched enteral nutrition changes organ failure compared with control (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Enteral may leads to lower mortality compared with parenteral nutrition (low certainty).
Enteral probably leads to lower multiple Organ Failure(MOF) compared with parenteral nutrition (moderate certainty).
Enteral probably leads to lower operative Intervention compared with parenteral nutrition (moderate certainty).
Enteral probably leads to lower systemic infection compared with parenteral nutrition (moderate certainty).
Enteral showed no clear difference in local septic complications compared with parenteral nutrition (moderate certainty).
It is very uncertain whether nasogastric changes requirement for parenteral nutrition compared with nasojejunal tube feeding (very low certainty).
Immunonutrition may leads to lower all‐cause mortality compared with control (low certainty).