Cochrane · systematic review · CD002837
Enteral versus parenteral nutrition for acute pancreatitis
Al‐Omran, M, AlBalawi, ZH, Tashkandi, MF, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2010 · Cochrane Library
GutAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 2 · 33.3%Moderate 4 · 66.7%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Enteral compared to parenteral nutrition for acute pancreatitis
Population: patients with acute pancreatitis
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Mortality Enteral vs parenteral nutrition | RR 0.5 [0.28, 0.91] | 8 studies · 348 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Length of hospital stay Enteral vs parenteral nutrition | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 145 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Multiple Organ Failure(MOF) Enteral vs parenteral nutrition | RR 0.55 [0.37, 0.81] | 6 studies · 278 participants | Moderate Downgraded: imprecision |
Operative Intervention Enteral vs parenteral nutrition | RR 0.46 [0.26, 0.82] | 7 studies · 316 participants | Moderate Downgraded: imprecision |
Systemic infection Enteral vs parenteral nutrition | RR 0.39 [0.23, 0.65] | 7 studies · 259 participants | Moderate Downgraded: imprecision |
Local septic complications Enteral vs parenteral nutrition | RR 0.74 [0.4, 1.35] | 5 studies · 246 participants | Moderate Downgraded: imprecision |