Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

23 questions · 32 findings · 5 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 9 · 28.1%GRADE not reported 16 · 50%Very low 1 · 3.1%Low 6 · 18.8%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Resin composite restorations containing antibacterial agents vs Non-antibacterial containing composite restorations

Costs (direct costs of interventions) · Adults and adolescents in any age group with restorations in the permanent dentition and children with restorations in the primary dentition

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Antibacterial agents in composite restorations for the prevention of dental caries 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
No studies were included in this review, as we were unable to find any trials directly comparing antibacterial containing composites to other active interventions or controls.
0 studies
No studies found

Direct resin composite veneer vs Porcelain (indirect) veneer

Patient satisfaction · Patients with permanent anterior teeth with intrinsic staining suitable for laminate veneer restorations

1 finding from 1 review

Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains 2004 · Cochrane All outcomes
2 years
Meijering 1998 (Table 4): patients satisfied at 2 years - direct resin composite 67%, porcelain 93%. No statistical comparison performed.
1 study
GRADE not reported

Ceramic inlays (all types) vs Composite resin (direct restoration)

Outcome not reported · Adults who require restorative treatment in posterior teeth

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Ceramic inlays for restoring posterior teeth 2003 · Cochrane All outcomes
No eligible randomised controlled trial comparing ceramic inlays with composite resin (direct) restorations was identified; this planned comparison could not be evaluated.
0 studies
No studies found