Gastrointestinal adverse events · people with depression after stroke
It is very uncertain whether pharmacological interventions changes adverse events: all ‐ gastrointestinal effects (e.g. constipation,… compared with placebo (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Combination silicone foam dressings · people with pressure ulcers
It is very uncertain whether NMA evidence for individual network: proportion with complete… changes combination silicone foam dressings compared with saline gauze (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.93 [0.38, 9.98]
Studies not reported
Very low
Depression: meeting study criteria for depression at end of · people with depression after stroke
2 findings from 1 review
Depression: < 50% reduction in scale scores at end of treatment (primary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
1 finding from 1 review
Depression: mean scores at end of treatment (secondary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events: death ‐ at end of treatment (secondary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
1 finding from 1 review
Gastrointestinal adverse events · people with depression after stroke
1 finding from 1 review
Depression: meeting study criteria for depression at end of · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological intervention and non‐invasive brain stimulation… may leads to lower depression: meeting the criteria for depression at end of treatment… compared with a pharmacological intervention and sham stimulation or usual care… (low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Depression: < 50% reduction in scale scores at end of treatment (primary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
It is very uncertain whether pharmacological intervention and non‐invasive brain stimulation… changes depression: < 50% reduction in scale scores at end of treatment… compared with a pharmacological intervention and sham stimulation or usual care… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Depression: mean scores at end of treatment (secondary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events: death ‐ at end of treatment (secondary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
It is very uncertain whether pharmacological intervention and non‐invasive brain stimulation… changes adverse events: death (secondary outcome) compared with a pharmacological intervention and sham stimulation or usual care… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events: all ‐ central nervous system events (e.g. headache, seizures) (secondary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
It is very uncertain whether pharmacological intervention and non‐invasive brain stimulation… changes adverse events: all ‐ central nervous system events (e.g. headache,… compared with a pharmacological intervention and sham stimulation or usual care… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events: all ‐ other events ‐ not listed above (e.g. dysuria, neck pain, eye discomfort) (secondary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
It is very uncertain whether pharmacological intervention and non‐invasive brain stimulation… changes adverse events: all ‐ other events ‐ not listed above (e.g.… compared with a pharmacological intervention and sham stimulation or usual care… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Perception of improvement or cure · men with urinary incontinence following prostate surgery
Combinations of conservative treatments showed no clear difference in subjective cure or improvement: patient‐reported as defined by the… compared with no treatment, sham treatment or verbal/written instruction (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Disease‐specific quality of life · men with urinary incontinence following prostate surgery
Combinations of conservative treatments showed no clear difference in condition‐specific quality of life: using validated questionnaires,… compared with no treatment, sham treatment or verbal/written instruction (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Objective cure or improvement: > 6 to 12 months · men with urinary incontinence following prostate surgery
Combinations of conservative treatments showed no clear difference in objective cure or improvement: > 6 to 12 months compared with no treatment, sham treatment or verbal/written instruction (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adherence · men with urinary incontinence following prostate surgery
It is very uncertain whether combinations of conservative treatments changes participant adherence to the intervention: as reported by the… compared with no treatment, sham treatment or verbal/written instruction (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
QoL · men with urinary incontinence following prostate surgery
Combinations of conservative treatments showed no clear difference in general quality of life: > 6 to 12 months compared with no treatment, sham treatment or verbal/written instruction (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Number of participants experiencing surface or skin‐related adverse events: e.g. skin reactions, bruising, hypersensitivity to gel · men with urinary incontinence following prostate surgery
1 finding from 1 review
Number of participants experiencing muscle‐related adverse events: e.g. soreness, discomfort, cramps, pain · men with urinary incontinence following prostate surgery
It is very uncertain whether combinations of conservative treatments changes number of participants experiencing muscle‐related adverse events:… compared with no treatment, sham treatment or verbal/written instruction (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review