Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,072 questions · 4,237 findings · 447 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 946 · 22.3%GRADE not reported 257 · 6.1%Very low 1,121 · 26.5%Low 1,207 · 28.5%Moderate 568 · 13.4%High 138 · 3.3%

Summary of findings table 3: comparison of operation types: firebreak skin grafting vs z‐plasty closure of fasciectomy

PEM hand function score at 3 years Major outcome group 1 (hand function) (scores between 0 and 77, where 0 represents no impairment in hand function and 77 represents maximum impairment in hand function) · 79 participants (Ullah 2009)
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table 4: refining rehabilitation: three months of postoperative night splinting with hand therapy vs hand therapy alone

DASH hand function score at 3 months Major outcome group 1 (hand function) (scores between 0 and 100, where 0 represents no impairment in hand function and 100 represents maximum impairment in hand function) · 210 participants with Dupuytren's disease of the fingers in 2 studies (225 digits reported across all studies) (Collis 2013;…
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table 4: refining rehabilitation: three months of postoperative night splinting with hand therapy vs hand therapy alone

Major outcome group 2 (patient satisfaction) · 210 participants with Dupuytren's disease of the fingers in 2 studies (225 digits reported across all studies) (Collis 2013;…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table 4: refining rehabilitation: three months of postoperative night splinting with hand therapy vs hand therapy alone

Total active extension at 3 months Major outcome group 3 (early objective measurement) Total active extension (TAE) of MCPJ, PIPJ and DIPJ; higher value indicates loss of extension and a worse outcome · 210 participants with Dupuytren's disease of the fingers in 2 studies (225 digits reported across all studies) (Collis 2013;…
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table 1: comparison of operation types: early results of needle fasciotomy vs limited fasciectomy

DASH hand function score at 3 months Major outcome group 1 (hand function) (scores between 0 and 100, where 0 represents no impairment in hand function and 100 represents maximum impairment in hand function) · 125 hands in 121 participants with Dupuytren's disease of the fingers for early outcomes (van Rijssen 2006)
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table 4: refining rehabilitation: three months of postoperative night splinting with hand therapy vs hand therapy alone

Recurrence · 210 participants with Dupuytren's disease of the fingers in 2 studies (225 digits reported across all studies) (Collis 2013;…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table 4: refining rehabilitation: three months of postoperative night splinting with hand therapy vs hand therapy alone

Total active flexion at three months Major outcome group 5 (adverse effects) Total active flexion (TAF) of MCPJ, PIPJ and DIPJ; lower value indicates loss of flexion and a worse outcome · 210 participants with Dupuytren's disease of the fingers in 2 studies (225 digits reported across all studies) (Collis 2013;…
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table 1: comparison of operation types: early results of needle fasciotomy vs limited fasciectomy

Early angular outcome at 6 weeks for Tubiana grade I disease (total passive extension deficit (TPED) of the MCPJ, PIPJ and DIPJ for preoperative contractures with a TPED of 0 to 45 degrees) Early angular outcome at 6 weeks for Tubiana grade II dis... · 125 hands in 121 participants with Dupuytren's disease of the fingers for early outcomes (van Rijssen 2006)
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table 2: comparison of operation types: late results of needle fasciotomy vs limited fasciectomy

DASH hand function score at 3 months Major outcome group 1 (hand function) (scores between 0 and 100, where 0 represents no impairment in hand function and 100 represents maximum impairment in hand function) · 93 participants (van Rijssen 2012a)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review