Question · asked by 1 review
Summary of findings table 3: comparison of operation types: firebreak skin grafting vs z‐plasty closure of fasciectomy: PEM hand function score at 3 years Major outcome group 1 (hand function) (scores between 0 and 77, where 0 represents no impairment in hand function and 77 represents maximum impairment in hand function)
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings table 3: comparison of operation types: firebreak skin grafting vs z‐plasty closure of fasciectomy PEM hand function score at 3 years Major outcome group 1 (hand function) (scores between 0 and 77, where 0 represents no impairment in hand function and 77 represents maximum impairment in hand function) · 79 participants (Ullah 2009) Surgery for Dupuytren's contracture of the fingers (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 79 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surgery for Dupuytren's contracture of the fingers 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.