Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,345 questions · 4,525 findings · 483 reviews

No studies found 1,024 · 22.6%GRADE not reported 388 · 8.6%Very low 1,172 · 25.9%Low 1,227 · 27.1%Moderate 576 · 12.7%High 138 · 3%

Wavefront procedures vs conventional procedures

Proportion of eyes that had lost 1 or more lines of best spectacle‐corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) posttreatment:12 months ‐ Procedure PRK · Adults with refractive errors

Wavefront procedures showed no clear difference in proportion of eyes that had lost 1 or more lines of best… compared with conventional procedures (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Wavefront procedures vs conventional procedures

Proportion of eyes within ± 0.50 diopters (D) of target refraction: 12 months ‐ Procedure PRK · Adults with refractive errors

Wavefront procedures showed no clear difference in proportion of eyes within ± 0.50 diopters (D) of target refraction:… compared with conventional procedures (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Wavefront procedures vs conventional procedures

Proportion of eyes that had lost 1 or more lines of best spectacle‐corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) posttreatment‐procedure LASIK; Mean higher‐order aberrations (HOAs) post‐treatment, measured by machine with wavefront sensor; proportion of eyes wi... · Adults with refractive errors

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Wavefront‐optimized procedures vs wavefront‐guided procedures

Proportion of eyes with uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better post‐treatment. ‐ 12 months · Adults with refractive errors

Wavefront‐optimized procedures showed no clear difference in proportion of eyes with uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or… compared with wavefront‐guided procedures (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Wavefront‐optimized procedures vs wavefront‐guided procedures

Loss of 1 or more lines of BSCVA at 12 months post treatment · Adults with refractive errors

Wavefront‐optimized procedures showed no clear difference in proportion of eyes that had lost 1 or more lines of best… compared with wavefront‐guided procedures (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Hydrus microstent vs iStent trabecular micro‐bypass stent

Glaucoma progression at 12 months, measured by additional visual field defects · people with open angle glaucoma, many of whom had mild or moderate glaucoma, which was well‐controlled with medication

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Hydrus microstent vs iStent trabecular micro‐bypass stent

Mean change in health‐related quality of life · people with open angle glaucoma, many of whom had mild or moderate glaucoma, which was well‐controlled with medication

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Hydrus microstent vs iStent trabecular micro‐bypass stent

Proportion of participants who were medication‐free (not using eye drops) short‐term · people with open angle glaucoma, many of whom had mild or moderate glaucoma, which was well‐controlled with medication

Hydrus microstent may leads to higher proportion of participants who were medication‐free (not using eye… compared with iStent trabecular micro‐bypass stent (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Hydrus microstent vs iStent trabecular micro‐bypass stent

Mean change in unmedicated IOP (after washout) measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry short‐term · people with open angle glaucoma, many of whom had mild or moderate glaucoma, which was well‐controlled with medication
1 finding from 1 review