Yoga vs no intervention
Anxiety (trait) · UC patients
1 finding from 1 review
- Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 60 participantsVery low
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
4,756 questions · 11,779 findings · 747 reviews · Headline outcomes only
No studies found 3,205 · 27.2%GRADE not reported 628 · 5.3%Very low 3,261 · 27.7%Low 2,913 · 24.7%Moderate 1,453 · 12.3%High 319 · 2.7%
Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.
Kefir ( Lactobacillus bacteria) vs no intervention
Treatment success as defined by the authors · UC patients
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Kefir ( Lactobacillus bacteria) vs no intervention
Pain frequency or change in pain frequency · UC patients
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Kefir ( Lactobacillus bacteria) vs no intervention
Pain intensity (measure on a 0‐3 four‐point scale) · UC patients
1 finding from 1 review
- Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 25 participantsVery low
Low FODMAP diet vs sham diet
Pain frequency or change in pain frequency · UC patients
1 finding from 1 review
- Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 26 participantsVery low
Kefir ( Lactobacillus bacteria) vs no intervention
Withdrawals due to adverse events · UC patients
1 finding from 1 review
- Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 20 participantsGRADE not reported
Stellate ganglion block vs sulphasalazine
Treatment success as defined by the authors · UC patients
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Stellate ganglion block vs sulphasalazine
Pain frequency or change in pain frequency · UC patients
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Stellate ganglion block vs sulphasalazine
Pain intensity (measure on a 0‐3 four‐point scale) · UC patients
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Stellate ganglion block vs sulphasalazine
Withdrawals due to adverse events · UC patients
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Low FODMAP diet vs sham diet
Pain intensity (0‐10cm visual analogue scale) · UC patients
1 finding from 1 review
- Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 26 participantsVery low
Low FODMAP diet vs sham diet
Withdrawals due to adverse events · UC patients
It is very uncertain whether low FODMAPs diet changes withdrawal due to adverse events compared with sham diet (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 1.851 study · 52 participantsVery low
Relaxation vs WAIT LIST
Treatment success as defined by the authors · UC patients
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Relaxation vs WAIT LIST
Pain frequency or change in pain frequency · UC patients
2 findings from 1 review
- Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 40 participantsVery low
- Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 40 participantsVery low
Relaxation vs WAIT LIST
Pain intensity (end of intervention, unidentified 0‐10 scale) · UC patients
1 finding from 1 review
- Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 40 participantsVery low
Relaxation vs WAIT LIST
Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · UC patients
1 finding from 1 review
- Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 40 participantsVery low
Comparison 1: Individual CBT‐based psychotherapy vs TAU or another comparator
Repetition of SH at post‐intervention · self‐harm in children and adolescents (up to 18 years or age)
Comparison 1: Individual CBT‐based psychotherapy showed no clear difference in repetition of SH by post‐intervention compared with TAU or other comparator (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- OR 0.93 [0.12, 7.24]2 studies · 51 participantsLow
Comparison 2: DBT‐A vs TAU or another comparator
Repetition of SH at post‐intervention · self‐harm in children and adolescents (up to 18 years or age)
Comparison 2: DBT‐A leads to lower repetition of SH at post‐intervention compared with TAU or another comparator (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- OR 0.46 [0.26, 0.82]4 studies · 270 participantsHigh
Comparison 3: MBT‐A vs TAU or another comparator
Repetition of SH at post‐intervention · self‐harm in children and adolescents (up to 18 years or age)
It is very uncertain whether comparison 3: MBT‐A changes repetition of SH at post‐intervention compared with TAU or another comparator (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- OR 0.7 [0.06, 8.46]2 studies · 85 participantsVery low
Family therapy vs placebo
Repetition of SH at post‐intervention · self‐harm in children and adolescents (up to 18 years or age)
Comparison 7: Family therapy showed no clear difference in repetition of SH at post‐intervention compared with placebo (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- OR 1 [0.49, 2.07]2 studies · 191 participantsModerate