Adverse events · children U5
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
5 participants
GRADE not reported
Any iCCM illness · children U5
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: integrated community case management changes any iCCM illness compared with usual facility services plus CCM (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.59 [0.66, 3.87]
7876 participants
Very low
Quality of care · children U5
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
2 participants
GRADE not reported
Vaginal birth within 24 hours · women with ruptured membranes in the third trimester for induction of labour.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol may leads to lower uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes compared with vaginal dinoprostone (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Oxytocin augmentation · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol changes oxytocin augmentation compared with vaginal dinoprostone (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Uterine hyperstimulation without fetal heart rate changes · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol probably leads to lower uterine hyperstimulation without fetal heart rate changes compared with vaginal dinoprostone (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol showed no clear difference in apgar score less than seven at five minutes compared with vaginal dinoprostone (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Admission to neonatal intensive care unit · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol showed no clear difference in admission to neonatal intensive care unit compared with vaginal dinoprostone (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Vaginal birth within 24 hours · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol may leads to lower vaginal birth within 24 hours compared with vaginal misoprostol (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Caesarean section · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with vaginal misoprostol (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol may leads to lower uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes compared with vaginal misoprostol (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Oxytocin augmentation · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol may leads to higher oxytocin augmentation compared with vaginal misoprostol (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Uterine hyperstimulation without fetal heart rate changes · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol may leads to lower uterine hyperstimulation without fetal heart rate changes compared with vaginal misoprostol (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Caesarean section · women with ruptured membranes in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with placebo/no treatment (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol showed no clear difference in apgar score less than seven at five minutes compared with vaginal misoprostol (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Admission to neonatal intensive care unit · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol showed no clear difference in admission to neonatal intensive care unit compared with vaginal misoprostol (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Vaginal birth within 24 hours · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol showed no clear difference in vaginal birth within 24 hours compared with intravenous oxytocin (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Caesarean section · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol probably leads to lower caesarean section compared with intravenous oxytocin (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol changes uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes compared with intravenous oxytocin (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review