Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between T allele vs C allele of AMELX rs17878486 and dental caries susceptibility (T vs C model: OR 2.87, 95% CI 0.35-23.23) in the Control group: Caries-free subgroup; certainty not graded.
6 findings from 1 review
Show 3 more findings
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between CT genotype vs CC genotype of AMELX rs2106416 and dental caries susceptibility (CT vs CC model: OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.65-2.22) in the Ethnicity: Caucasian subgroup; certainty not graded.
2 findings from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Marginal integrity success rate
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Anatomic form success rate
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between GG genotype vs AA + AG genotype of ENAM rs1264848 and dental caries susceptibility (GG vs AA + AG model: OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.53-2.23) in the Ethnicity: Mixed subgroup; certainty not graded.
2 findings from 1 review
Poor oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) · Children aged 3-12 years
Children from low-income families had higher odds of poor OHRQoL (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.11-1.21; 4 studies; ungraded).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 1.16 [1.11, 1.21]
4 studies
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Asian (n=1) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 1.38 (95% CI 0.25 to 7.75).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 1.38 [0.25, 7.75]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
The pooled odds ratio was 0.55 (95% CI 0.13 to 2.25).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Absence of recurrent caries success rate
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Absence of recurrent caries success rate
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Age group: Children (n=4) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 0.95 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.13).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.95 [0.80, 1.13]
4 studies
GRADE not reported
Dental caries · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
A gene-based analysis indicated that multiple LTF variants were jointly associated with dental caries risk (weighted TPM P = 0.0007; no pooled effect estimate; ungraded).
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between TT genotype vs CC + CT genotype of AMELX rs2106416 and dental caries susceptibility (TT vs CC + CT model: OR 1.67, 95% CI 0.44-6.34) in the Ethnicity: Caucasian subgroup; certainty not graded.
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Caucasian (n=2) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 2.03 (95% CI 0.10 to 42.44).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 2.03 [0.10, 42.44]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Caucasian (n=1) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 1.27 (95% CI 0.49 to 3.30).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 1.27 [0.49, 3.30]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Asian (n=2) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 0.89 (95% CI 0.23 to 3.48).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.89 [0.23, 3.48]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Dental caries in primary teeth · Children (primary dentition) worldwide
In Australia, the pooled prevalence of primary-teeth caries in children was 28.5% (95% CI 20.3 to 38.5); certainty not graded.
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between AG + GG genotype (G-allele carriers) vs AA genotype of ENAM rs1264848 and dental caries susceptibility (AG + GG vs AA model: OR 1.69, 95% CI 0.78-3.68) in the Ethnicity: Mixed subgroup; certainty not graded.
5 findings from 1 review
Show 2 more findings
Intervention not reported
Microleakage/infiltration index: Er,Cr:YSGG vs traditional bur
1 finding from 1 review
Qualitative NR [NR, NR]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Marginal integrity success rate
1 finding from 1 review