Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

705 questions · 723 findings · 78 reviews

No studies found 198 · 27.4%GRADE not reported 30 · 4.1%Very low 158 · 21.9%Low 211 · 29.2%Moderate 98 · 13.6%High 28 · 3.9%

Metal-free cantilevered FDPs (feldspathic-veneered zirconia) vs Metal-ceramic cantilevered FDPs

Cantilevered bridge failure · Adults (18 years or older) needing replacement of one premolar or incisor with a cantilevered fixed dental prosthesis
1 finding from 1 review

Metal-free cantilevered FDPs (feldspathic-veneered zirconia) vs Metal-ceramic cantilevered FDPs

Gingival index (GI) · Adults (18 years or older) needing replacement of one premolar or incisor with a cantilevered fixed dental prosthesis

Metal-free cantilevered FDPs (feldspathic-veneered zirconia) showed no clear difference in gingival index (GI) compared with metal-ceramic cantilevered FDPs; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Metal-free cantilevered FDPs (feldspathic-veneered zirconia) vs Metal-ceramic cantilevered FDPs

Cantilevered bridge complications · Adults (18 years or older) needing replacement of one premolar or incisor with a cantilevered fixed dental prosthesis

It is very uncertain whether metal-free cantilevered FDPs (feldspathic-veneered zirconia) changes cantilevered bridge complications compared with metal-ceramic cantilevered FDPs (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Metal-free cantilevered FDPs (feldspathic-veneered zirconia) vs Metal-ceramic cantilevered FDPs

Aesthetics evaluated by the patient · Adults (18 years or older) needing replacement of one premolar or incisor with a cantilevered fixed dental prosthesis

It is very uncertain whether metal-free cantilevered FDPs (feldspathic-veneered zirconia) changes aesthetic evaluation (patient VAS) compared with metal-ceramic cantilevered FDPs (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Trapeziectomy with interpositional arthroplasty (T and IA) vs trapeziometacarpal joint replacement (Swanson)

Adverse events Complications reported · Patients with thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis

Trapeziectomy with interpositional arthroplasty (T and IA) showed no clear difference in adverse events Complications reported compared with trapeziometacarpal joint replacement (Swanson) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Primary comparison for continuous passive motion (CPM) vs no CPM

Manipulation under anaesthesia · hospitalised patients who have undergone knee replacement surgery

It is very uncertain whether primary comparison for continuous passive motion (CPM) changes manipulation under anaesthesia Counts of manipulation under… compared with no CPM (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Primary comparison for continuous passive motion (CPM) vs no CPM

Adverse events (a count of reported harms or adverse events/experiences over life of study/ · hospitalised patients who have undergone knee replacement surgery

Primary comparison for continuous passive motion (CPM) showed no clear difference in adverse events Counts of adverse events compared with no CPM (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Hyperbaric oxygen vs No HBO therapy

Preimplantation complications · Patients who have had radiotherapy and who have missing teeth that require replacement with osseointegrated dental implants

Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy led to lower preimplantation complications compared with no HBO therapy; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Hyperbaric oxygen vs No HBO therapy

Prosthetic failure (2 years) · Patients who have had radiotherapy and who have missing teeth that require replacement with osseointegrated dental implants

It is very uncertain whether hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy changes prosthetic failure compared with no HBO therapy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review