Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

579 questions · 601 findings · 56 reviews

No studies found 143 · 23.8%GRADE not reported 69 · 11.5%Very low 101 · 16.8%Low 142 · 23.6%Moderate 116 · 19.3%High 30 · 5%

Endovascular revascularisation plus conservative therapy vs conservative therapy

Maximum walking distance · intermittent claudication
2 findings from 1 review

Endovascular revascularisation plus conservative therapy vs conservative therapy

Pain‐free walking distance · intermittent claudication
2 findings from 1 review

Endovascular revascularisation plus conservative therapy vs conservative therapy

Secondary invasive interventions · intermittent claudication

Endovascular revascularisation plus conservative therapy leads to lower secondary invasive interventions compared with conservative therapy alone (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endovascular revascularisation vs conservative therapy

Maximum walking distance · intermittent claudication
2 findings from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Pain‐free walking distance (m) · adults with intermittent claudication
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Maximum walking distance (m) · adults with intermittent claudication
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Ankle brachial index · adults with intermittent claudication
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Mortality: all‐cause deaths · adults with intermittent claudication

The intervention showed no clear difference in mortality: all‐cause deaths (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Amputation · adults with intermittent claudication

The intervention showed no clear difference in amputation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Quality of Life SF‐36 Physical Summary score (scale 0 to 100, higher score indicates better quality of life) · adults with intermittent claudication
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Quality of Life SF‐36 Mental Summary score (scale 0 to 100, higher score indicates better quality of life) · adults with intermittent claudication
1 finding from 1 review

Admission cardiotocography vs intermittent auscultation

Rate of caesarean section · Low risk pregnant women. All of the women were in labour.

Admission cardiotocography showed no clear difference in incidence of caesarean section compared with intermittent auscultation (low‐risk women) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Admission cardiotocography vs intermittent auscultation

Instrumental vaginal birth · Low risk pregnant women. All of the women were in labour.

Admission cardiotocography showed no clear difference in incidence of operative vaginal birth compared with intermittent auscultation (low‐risk women) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Admission cardiotocography vs intermittent auscultation

Perinatal mortality rate (fetal and neonatal deaths excluding lethal congenital anomalies) · Low risk pregnant women. All of the women were in labour.

Admission cardiotocography showed no clear difference in perinatal mortality rate (fetal and neonatal deaths excluding lethal… compared with intermittent auscultation (low‐risk women) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review