Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

821 questions · 842 findings · 96 reviews

No studies found 275 · 32.7%GRADE not reported 88 · 10.5%Very low 197 · 23.4%Low 187 · 22.2%Moderate 86 · 10.2%High 9 · 1.1%

FIBRINOGEN: Therapeutic trials: intervention vs inactive control

All‐cause mortality In‐hospital mortality up to 30 days post‐operatively · the prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients without haemophilia

FIBRINOGEN: Therapeutic trials: intervention showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality In‐hospital mortality up to 30 days… compared with inactive Control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

FXIII: Prophylactic trials: intervention vs inactive control

Venous thromboembolic events · the prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients without haemophilia

FXIII: Prophylactic trials: intervention showed no clear difference in venous thromboembolic events ‐ Up to 5 to 7 weeks post‐operatively compared with inactive control (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

FXIII: Prophylactic trials: intervention vs inactive control

Venous thromboembolic events Up to 30 days post‐operatively · the prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients without haemophilia

FXIII: Prophylactic trials: intervention showed no clear difference in venous thromboembolic events Up to 30 days post‐operatively compared with inactive control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

FIBRINOGEN: Therapeutic trials: intervention vs inactive control

All‐cause mortality Up to 28 days post‐operatively · the prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients without haemophilia

FIBRINOGEN: Therapeutic trials: intervention showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality Up to 46 days post‐operatively compared with inactive Control (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

FIBRINOGEN: Therapeutic trials: intervention vs haemostatically active control

All‐cause mortality Up to 28 days post‐operatively · the prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients without haemophilia
2 findings from 1 review

Electrical stimulation vs Placebo / sham solution

Participants with improvement in urgency urinary incontinence · Adults with overactive bladder (OAB)

Electrical stimulation showed no clear difference in participants with improvement in urgency urinary incontinence compared with placebo or sham treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Colonic transit rate (geometric centre of radioactive substance). Unit indicates position along with intestinal tract. Scale from: 1 (small intestine) to 5 (rectosigmoid area). · children with chronic constipation
1 finding from 1 review