Intervention not reported
Intervention: high‐dose radiotherapy Comparison: low‐dose radiotherapy Outcome: neurocognitive impairment at 5 years after treatment · people with glioma surviving at least two years
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes intervention: high‐dose radiotherapy Comparison: low‐dose… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Improvement in lower limb perfusion: ABI · people with critical limb ischaemia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Improvement in lower limb perfusion: TcO₂ reading in mmHg · people with critical limb ischaemia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Low‐fibre diet · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Low‐fat diet · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Severe exacerbations: low‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/LAMA showed no clear difference in severe exacerbations: low‐risk population compared with LAMA (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pneumonia: low‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/LAMA showed no clear difference in pneumonia: low‐risk population compared with LAMA (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Moderate to severe exacerbations: low‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/LAMA probably leads to lower moderate to severe exacerbations: low‐risk population compared with LABA (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Severe exacerbations: low‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/LAMA showed no clear difference in severe exacerbations: low‐risk population compared with LABA (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pneumonia: low‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/LAMA showed no clear difference in pneumonia: low‐risk population compared with LABA (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Moderate to severe exacerbations: low‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/LAMA showed no clear difference in moderate to severe exacerbations: low‐risk population compared with LABA/ICS (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Moderate to severe exacerbations: low‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/ICS showed no clear difference in moderate to severe exacerbations: low‐risk population compared with LAMA (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Severe exacerbations: low‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/ICS showed no clear difference in severe exacerbations: low‐risk population compared with LAMA (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pneumonia: low‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/ICS showed no clear difference in pneumonia: low‐risk population compared with LAMA (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Moderate to severe exacerbations: low‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/ICS probably leads to lower moderate to severe exacerbations: low‐risk population compared with LABA (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Severe exacerbations: low‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/ICS showed no clear difference in severe exacerbations: low‐risk population compared with LABA (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pneumonia: low‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/ICS leads to higher pneumonia: low‐risk population compared with LABA (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Moderate to severe exacerbations: low‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LAMA showed no clear difference in moderate to severe exacerbations: low‐risk population compared with LABA (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Severe exacerbations: low‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LAMA showed no clear difference in severe exacerbations: low‐risk population compared with LABA (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pneumonia: low‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LAMA showed no clear difference in pneumonia: low‐risk population compared with LABA (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review