Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,678 questions · 4,859 findings · 283 reviews

No studies found 1,225 · 25.2%GRADE not reported 215 · 4.4%Very low 1,241 · 25.5%Low 1,210 · 24.9%Moderate 776 · 16%High 192 · 4%

Summary of findings: lipid‐based nutrient supplements (LNS) vs iron folic acid (IFA)

Maternal anaemia at term or near term (haemoglobin (Hb) less than 110 g/L) · pregnant women

Summary of findings: lipid‐based nutrient supplements (LNS) probably leads to higher maternal anaemia at term or near term (haemoglobin (Hb) less than… compared with iron folic acid (IFA) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: lipid‐based nutrient supplements (LNS) vs iron folic acid (IFA)

Maternal death · pregnant women

Summary of findings: lipid‐based nutrient supplements (LNS) showed no clear difference in maternal mortality (measured at six weeks postpartum) compared with iron folic acid (IFA) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: lipid‐based nutrient supplements (LNS) vs iron folic acid (IFA)

Low birth weight (< 2.5 kg) · pregnant women

Summary of findings: lipid‐based nutrient supplements (LNS) showed no clear difference in low birth weight (< 2500 g) compared with iron folic acid (IFA) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: lipid‐based nutrient supplements (LNS) vs iron folic acid (IFA)

Small‐for‐gestational age · pregnant women

Summary of findings: lipid‐based nutrient supplements (LNS) probably leads to lower small‐for‐gestational age compared with iron folic acid (IFA) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: lipid‐based nutrient supplements (LNS) vs iron folic acid (IFA)

Preterm birth · pregnant women

Summary of findings: lipid‐based nutrient supplements (LNS) showed no clear difference in preterm births (births before 37 weeks of gestation) compared with iron folic acid (IFA) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: lipid‐based nutrient supplements (LNS) vs multiple micronutrients (MMN)

Maternal anaemia at term or near term (haemoglobin (Hb) less than 110 g/L) · pregnant women

Summary of findings: lipid‐based nutrient supplements (LNS) probably leads to higher maternal anaemia at term or near term (haemoglobin (Hb) less than… compared with multiple micronutrients (MMN) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: modified Pomeroy partial salpingectomy vs electrocoagulation

Minor morbidity: total · women > 6 weeks postpartum requesting tubal sterilisation

Summary of findings: modified Pomeroy partial salpingectomy may leads to higher minor morbidity: total compared with electrocoagulation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: modified Pomeroy partial salpingectomy vs electrocoagulation

Minor morbidity: procedure‐related injuries with no additional operation · women > 6 weeks postpartum requesting tubal sterilisation

Summary of findings: modified Pomeroy partial salpingectomy showed no clear difference in minor morbidity: procedure‐related injuries with no additional… compared with electrocoagulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: modified Pomeroy partial salpingectomy vs electrocoagulation

Failure rate: total (12 months) · women > 6 weeks postpartum requesting tubal sterilisation

Summary of findings: modified Pomeroy partial salpingectomy showed no clear difference in failure rate: total (12 months) compared with electrocoagulation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: modified Pomeroy partial salpingectomy vs electrocoagulation

Complaints ‐ postoperative pain (24 hours) · women > 6 weeks postpartum requesting tubal sterilisation

Summary of findings: modified Pomeroy partial salpingectomy probably leads to higher complaints ‐ postoperative pain (24 hours) compared with electrocoagulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: modified Pomeroy partial salpingectomy vs electrocoagulation

Complaints ‐ persistent pain at · women > 6 weeks postpartum requesting tubal sterilisation

Summary of findings: modified Pomeroy partial salpingectomy showed no clear difference in complaints ‐ persistent pain at compared with electrocoagulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: modified Pomeroy partial salpingectomy vs electrocoagulation

Major morbidity: total · women > 6 weeks postpartum requesting tubal sterilisation

Summary of findings: modified Pomeroy partial salpingectomy may leads to higher major morbidity: total compared with electrocoagulation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: modified Pomeroy partial salpingectomy vs electrocoagulation

Major morbidity: procedure‐related injuries requiring additional operation or blood transfusion · women > 6 weeks postpartum requesting tubal sterilisation

Summary of findings: modified Pomeroy partial salpingectomy showed no clear difference in major morbidity: procedure‐related injuries requiring additional… compared with electrocoagulation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: modified Pomeroy partial salpingectomy vs electrocoagulation

Major morbidity: rehospitalisation as a consequence of the operation · women > 6 weeks postpartum requesting tubal sterilisation

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: modified Pomeroy partial salpingectomy changes major morbidity: rehospitalisation as a consequence of the operation compared with electrocoagulation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review