Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,050 questions in 42 reviews · Incontinence

current versions
No studies 391 · 37.2%Ungraded 82 · 7.8%Very low 199 · 19%Low 206 · 19.6%Moderate 150 · 14.3%High 22 · 2.1%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Prevention of UI after radical: PFMT ± biofeedback vs no treatment
Number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months · All men after radical prostatectomy
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.32 [0.2, 0.51]2 studies · 373 participantsModerate
Prevention of UI after radical: PFMT ± biofeedback vs no treatment
Quality of life score assessed using (ICI‐SF UI score) ‐ within 6 to 12 months · All men after radical prostatectomy
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 105 participantsVery low
Treatment of UI after radical: PFMT ± biofeedback vs no treatment;
Urinary Incontinence Score (ICI‐SF) ‐ after first year · patients with postprostatectomy urinary incontinence
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 391 participantsLow
Prevention of UI after radical: PFMT ± biofeedback vs no treatment
Adverse events ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Prevention of UI after radical: PFMT ± biofeedback vs no treatment
Economic analysis using QALY ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Prevention of UI after radical: electric or magnetic energy vs no treatment
Number of incontinent men after 12 months ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Prevention of UI after radical: electric or magnetic energy vs no treatment
Quality of life score assessed using (ICIQ‐SF score) ‐ within 6 to 12 months · All men after radical prostatectomy
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 32 participantsVery low
Prevention of UI after radical: electric or magnetic energy vs no treatment
Adverse events ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Prevention of UI after radical: electric or magnetic energy vs no treatment
Economic analysis using QALY ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Prevention of UI after radical: combinations of treatments vs no treatment
Number of incontinent men within 6 to 12 months ‐ PFMT + anal EStim + biofeedback versus no treatment · All men after radical prostatectomy
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 60 participantsLow
Prevention of UI after radical: combinations of treatments vs no treatment
Quality of life Score assessed using (ICIQ‐SF) or (ICIQ‐ SF UI score) ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Prevention of UI after radical: combinations of treatments vs no treatment
Adverse events ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Prevention of UI after radical: combinations of treatments vs no treatment
Economic analysis using QALY ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Treatment of UI after radical: PFMT ± biofeedback vs no treatment;
Adverse events · patients with postprostatectomy urinary incontinence
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 138 participantsHigh
Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment vs another active treatment (PFMT pre and post‐operation versus PFMT post‐operation)
Number of incontinent men after 12 months · All men after radical prostatectomy
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 367 participantsModerate
Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment vs another active treatment (PFMT pre and post‐operation versus PFMT post‐operation)
Quality of Life Score assessed using (ICIQ‐SF) or (ICIQ‐SF UI score) after 12 months ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment vs another active treatment (PFMT pre and post‐operation versus PFMT post‐operation)
Adverse events · All men after radical prostatectomy
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 102 participantsHigh
Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment vs another active treatment (PFMT pre and post‐operation versus PFMT post‐operation)
Economic Analysis using QALY ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment vs another active treatment (PFMT + penile vibration pre and post‐operation versus PFMT pre and post‐operation)
Number of incontinent men after 12 months · All men after radical prostatectomy
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.4 [0.25, 7.77]1 study · 58 participantsLow
Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment vs another active treatment (PFMT + penile vibration pre and post‐operation versus PFMT pre and post‐operation)
Quality of life Score assessed using (ICIQ‐SF) or (ICIQ‐SF UI score) · All men after radical prostatectomy
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment vs another active treatment (PFMT + penile vibration pre and post‐operation versus PFMT pre and post‐operation)
Adverse events · All men after radical prostatectomy
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 68 participantsLow
Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment vs another active treatment (PFMT + penile vibration pre and post‐operation versus PFMT pre and post‐operation)
Economic analysis using QALY ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment vs another active treatment (pre‐operative PFMT + electrical stimulation versus pre‐operative PFMT)
Number of incontinent men after 12 months ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment vs another active treatment (pre‐operative PFMT + electrical stimulation versus pre‐operative PFMT)
Quality of Life Score assessed using (ICIQ‐SF) within 6 to 12 months · All men after radical prostatectomy
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 34 participantsVery low
Treatment of UI after radical: PFMT ± biofeedback vs no treatment;
Economic analysis using QALY ‐ not reported · patients with postprostatectomy urinary incontinence
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment vs another active treatment (pre‐operative PFMT + electrical stimulation versus pre‐operative PFMT)
Adverse events ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment vs another active treatment (pre‐operative PFMT + electrical stimulation versus pre‐operative PFMT)
Economic analysis using QALY ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Treatment of UI after TURP: PFMT ± biofeedback vs no treatment
Number of incontinent men‐ after 12 months · Men with UI after TURP
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 1609 participantsModerate
Treatment of UI after TURP: PFMT ± biofeedback vs no treatment
Quality of life Score assessed using Score (ICIQ‐SF UI score) ‐ after 12 months · Men with UI after TURP
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 397 participantsLow
Treatment of UI after TURP: PFMT ± biofeedback vs no treatment
Adverse events ‐ not reported · Men with UI after TURP
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Treatment of UI after TURP: PFMT ± biofeedback vs no treatment
Economic analysis using QALY ‐ not reported · Men with UI after TURP
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Prevention of UI after TURP: pre or post‐operative PFMT ± biofeedback vs no treatment
Number of incontinent men ‐ within 3 to 6 months · All men after TURP
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.51 [0.14, 1.89]1 study · 48 participantsVery low
Prevention of UI after TURP: pre or post‐operative PFMT ± biofeedback vs no treatment
Urinary Incontinence Score assessed using (ICIQ‐SF) or (ICIQ‐SF UI score) at 12 months ‐ not reported · All men after TURP
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Prevention of UI after TURP: pre or post‐operative PFMT ± biofeedback vs no treatment
Adverse events ‐ not reported · All men after TURP
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Prevention of UI after TURP: pre or post‐operative PFMT ± biofeedback vs no treatment
Economic analysis using QALY ‐ not reported · All men after TURP
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Treatment of UI after radical: electric or magnetic energy vs no treatment
Number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.26 [0.09, 0.74]3 studies · 413 participantsModerate
Treatment of UI after radical: electric or magnetic energy vs no treatment
Urinary Incontinence Score (ICIQ‐SF UI score) ‐ after 12 months · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 47 participantsLow
Treatment of UI after radical: electric or magnetic energy vs no treatment
Urinary Incontinence Quality of Life Score (ICIQ‐SF) ‐ after 12 months · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 47 participantsLow
Treatment of UI after radical: electric or magnetic energy vs no treatment
Adverse events · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.58 [0.11, 2.9]1 study · 56 participantsLow
Treatment of UI after radical: electric or magnetic energy vs no treatment
Economic analysis using QALY ‐ not reported · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Weight loss vs control
Cure rates by patient observation (all UI types) ‐ not reported · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Soy‐rich diet vs control
Condition‐specific quality of life ‐ not reported · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Soy‐rich diet vs control
Adverse effects ‐ not reported · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Soy‐rich diet vs control
Cure rates by symptom quantification (all UI types) ‐ not reported · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Soy‐rich diet vs control
Improvement rates by symptom quantification (all UI types) ‐ not reported · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Soy‐rich diet vs control
Incontinent episodes per week (all UI types) ‐ not reported · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Decreasing fluids vs increasing fluids
Cure rates by patient observation (all UI types) ‐ not reported · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Decreasing fluids vs increasing fluids
Improvement rates by patient observation (all UI types) ‐ not reported · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Decreasing fluids vs increasing fluids
Condition‐specific quality of life · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 69 participantsVery low
Decreasing fluids vs increasing fluids
Adverse effects · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 93 participantsVery low