Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

520 questions · 527 findings · 55 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 140 · 26.6%GRADE not reported 66 · 12.5%Very low 121 · 23%Low 115 · 21.8%Moderate 77 · 14.6%High 8 · 1.5%

Anaesthesia depth monitors (BIS and M‐entropy) vs standard monitoring

Adverse effects of intraoperative wakefulness and/or postoperative awareness (i.e. post‐traumatic stress syndrome, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, etc.) · patients with prevention of recall of events during surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Anaesthesia depth monitors (BIS) vs standard monitoring

Awareness: definite and possible Postoperative interview · patients with prevention of recall of events during surgery

Anaesthesia depth monitors (BIS) showed no clear difference in awareness: definite and possible Postoperative interview compared with standard clinical and electronic monitoring (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anaesthesia depth monitors (BIS) vs standard monitoring

Awareness: definite Postoperative interview · patients with prevention of recall of events during surgery

Anaesthesia depth monitors (BIS) showed no clear difference in awareness: definite Postoperative interview compared with standard clinical and electronic monitoring (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anaesthesia depth monitors (BIS) vs standard monitoring

Adverse effects of intraoperative wakefulness and/or postoperative awareness (i.e. post‐traumatic stress syndrome, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, etc.) · patients with prevention of recall of events during surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Scheduled surveillance vs clinical monitoring alone

Access thrombosis/vascular complication · people receiving haemodialysis to treat kidney failure and using a functioning AV access for haemodialysis.

Scheduled surveillance showed no clear difference in risk of access thrombosis compared with clinical monitoring alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Scheduled surveillance vs clinical monitoring alone

Risk of access loss · people receiving haemodialysis to treat kidney failure and using a functioning AV access for haemodialysis.

Scheduled surveillance showed no clear difference in risk of access loss compared with clinical monitoring alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital technology (web‐based platform CFHealthHub) vs usual care

Adherence to the inhaled treatment: percentage adherence · adults (aged 16 years and over) with CF

Digital technology (web‐based platform CFHealthHub) probably leads to higher adherence to the inhaled treatment: percentage adherence compared with usual care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital technology (web‐based platform CFHealthHub) vs usual care

Treatment burden · adults (aged 16 years and over) with CF

Digital technology (web‐based platform CFHealthHub) probably leads to higher treatment burden: CFQ‐R treatment burden domain score (higher score… compared with usual care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review