Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4,783 questions · 10,022 findings · 882 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 2,100 · 21%GRADE not reported 1,013 · 10.1%Very low 2,237 · 22.3%Low 2,514 · 25.1%Moderate 1,709 · 17.1%High 449 · 4.5%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Balneotherapy vs no treatment

Health‐related quality of life –CIVIQ2 Scale: 20–100 · people with chronic venous insufficiency

1 finding from 1 review

Balneotherapy for chronic venous insufficiency 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 153 participants
Very low

Balneotherapy vs dryland exercise

Incidence of leg ulcer · people with chronic venous insufficiency

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Balneotherapy for chronic venous insufficiency 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Balneotherapy vs dryland exercise

Skin pigmentation changes · people with chronic venous insufficiency

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Balneotherapy for chronic venous insufficiency 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Balneotherapy vs no treatment

Adverse events: thromboembolic events · people with chronic venous insufficiency

Balneotherapy showed no clear difference in adverse effects of treatment (thromboembolic event) compared with no treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Balneotherapy for chronic venous insufficiency 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.35 [0.09, 1.42]
3 studies · 584 participants
Low

Balneotherapy vs no treatment

Pain (VAS, scale 0–10, lower is better) · people with chronic venous insufficiency

1 finding from 1 review

Balneotherapy for chronic venous insufficiency 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 354 participants
Low

Balneotherapy vs no treatment

Oedema(leg circumference in cm, lower is better) · people with chronic venous insufficiency

1 finding from 1 review

Balneotherapy for chronic venous insufficiency 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 369 participants
Very low

Balneotherapy vs no treatment

Incidence of leg ulcer · people with chronic venous insufficiency

It is very uncertain whether balneotherapy changes incidence of leg ulcer compared with no treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Balneotherapy for chronic venous insufficiency 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.06 [0.27, 4.14]
2 studies · 449 participants
Very low

Balneotherapy vs no treatment

Skin pigmentation changes · people with chronic venous insufficiency

1 finding from 1 review

Balneotherapy for chronic venous insufficiency 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 59 participants
Low

Balneotherapy vs melilotus officinalis

Disease severity signs and symptoms score · people with chronic venous insufficiency

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Balneotherapy for chronic venous insufficiency 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Balneotherapy vs melilotus officinalis

Health‐related quality of life · people with chronic venous insufficiency

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Balneotherapy for chronic venous insufficiency 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Physiotherapy vs minimal care

Oerlemans 1999 Pain (VAS 0 to 100) · adults with CRPS I

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Physiotherapy for pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) types I and II 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Physiotherapy vs minimal care

Oerlemans 1999 Disability as measured by the impairment level sum score (5 to 50) Higher scores indicate greater impairment Measured 12 months post recruitment · adults with CRPS I

1 finding from 1 review

Physiotherapy for pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) types I and II 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 91 participants
Very low

Physiotherapy vs minimal care

Incidence/nature of adverse effects · adults with CRPS I

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Physiotherapy for pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) types I and II 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Physiotherapy vs minimal care

Pain (VAS 0 to 100) · adults with CRPS II

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Physiotherapy for pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) types I and II 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Physiotherapy vs minimal care

Disability · adults with CRPS II

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Physiotherapy for pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) types I and II 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Physiotherapy vs minimal care

Incidence/nature of adverse effects · adults with CRPS II

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Physiotherapy for pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) types I and II 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Scar severity ‐ 585‐nm Pulsed‐Dye Laser (PDL) versus no treatment ‐ patient self‐assessment of scar improvement of 50% or higher ‐ hypertrophic and keloid scars ‐ · participants with hypertrophic and keloid scars

Laser therapy may leads to higher scar severity ‐ 585‐nm Pulsed‐Dye Laser (PDL) versus no treatment ‐… compared with no treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Laser therapy for treating hypertrophic and keloid scars 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.96 [1.11, 3.45]
Studies not reported
Low

Laser therapy vs no treatment

Scar severity ‐ Fractional CO2 Laser versus no treatment ‐ VBS (higher scores = worse scar appearance) ‐ keloid scars ‐ · participants with hypertrophic and keloid scars

1 finding from 1 review

Laser therapy for treating hypertrophic and keloid scars 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low

Laser therapy vs no treatment

Scar severity ‐ 585‐nm Pulsed‐Dye Laser (PDL) versus Triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) ‐ Vancouver Burn Scar (VBS) (Higher score = worse scar appearance) ‐ hypertrophic scars ‐ · participants with hypertrophic and keloid scars

2 findings from 1 review

Laser therapy for treating hypertrophic and keloid scars 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low
Laser therapy for treating hypertrophic and keloid scars 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low

Laser therapy vs other treatments

1 finding from 1 review

Laser therapy for treating hypertrophic and keloid scars 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low