Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,721 questions · 19,640 findings · 2,039 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 3,754 · 19.1%GRADE not reported 1,273 · 6.5%Very low 4,859 · 24.7%Low 5,568 · 28.4%Moderate 3,240 · 16.5%High 946 · 4.8%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Mobile phone text messages vs usual care

Fatal cardiovascular events (percentage of people having fatal cardiovascular events) · people with established arterial occlusive events

Mobile phone text messaging showed no clear difference in fatal cardiovascular events (percentage of people having fatal… compared with usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive vs standard polyurethane

Arterial catheter failure assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive changes arterial catheter failure assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Bordered polyurethane vs standard polyurethane

Adverse events assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

It is very uncertain whether bordered polyurethane changes adverse events assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Standard polyurethane plus sutureless securement devices vs standard polyurethane

Arterial catheter failureassessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus sutureless securement devices changes arterial catheter failureassessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Standard polyurethane plus sutureless securement devices vs standard polyurethane

Dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus sutureless securement devices changes dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Standard polyurethane plus sutureless securement devices vs standard polyurethane

Occlusion assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus sutureless securement devices changes occlusion assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Standard polyurethane plus sutureless securement devices vs standard polyurethane

Adverse events assessed during catheter dwell and on product removal · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus sutureless securement devices changes adverse events assessed during catheter dwell and on product removal compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Integrated securement dressings vs standard polyurethane

Arterial catheter failureassessed during catheter dwell or 48 hours after removal · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

Integrated securement dressings showed no clear difference in arterial catheter failureassessed during catheter dwell or 48 hours… compared with standard polyurethane (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Integrated securement dressings vs standard polyurethane

Dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

Integrated securement dressings showed no clear difference in dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Integrated securement dressings vs standard polyurethane

Adverse events assessed during catheter dwell or on product removal · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

Integrated securement dressings showed no clear difference in adverse events assessed during catheter dwell or on product removal compared with standard polyurethane (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive vs standard polyurethane

Dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive changes dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive vs standard polyurethane

Occlusion assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive changes occlusion assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review