Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,703 questions · 3,824 findings · 858 reviews

No studies found 573 · 15%GRADE not reported 383 · 10%Very low 993 · 26%Low 1,062 · 27.8%Moderate 614 · 16.1%High 199 · 5.2%

Videolaryngoscopy vs direct laryngoscopy

Non‐airway‐related adverse effects: desaturation or bradycardia episodes, or both · neonates (0 to 28 days of age) who needed tracheal intubation

It is very uncertain whether videolaryngoscopy changes non‐airway‐related adverse effects: desaturation or bradycardia… compared with conventional direct laryngoscopy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Videolaryngoscopy vs direct laryngoscopy

Airway‐related adverse effects: airway trauma · neonates (0 to 28 days of age) who needed tracheal intubation

Videolaryngoscopy probably leads to lower airway‐related adverse effects: airway trauma compared with conventional direct laryngoscopy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Cilostazol vs aspirin

MACE · adults within 180 days of non‐cardioembolic ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack and a clinical history of prior intracerebral…

Summary of findings table ‐ Cilostazol showed no clear difference in MACE compared with aspirin (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Cilostazol vs aspirin

Death · adults within 180 days of non‐cardioembolic ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack and a clinical history of prior intracerebral…

Summary of findings table ‐ Cilostazol showed no clear difference in death compared with aspirin (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Cilostazol vs aspirin

Intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) · adults within 180 days of non‐cardioembolic ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack and a clinical history of prior intracerebral…

Summary of findings table ‐ Cilostazol showed no clear difference in intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) compared with aspirin (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intranasal steroid drops vs placebo

Presence of normal olfactory function · participants with olfactory dysfunction following COVID‐19 for ≤ 15 days

Intranasal steroid drops showed no clear difference in presence of normal olfactory function Assessed by participants > 4… compared with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review