Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

793 questions in 32 reviews · Periodontology

current versions
No studies 148 · 18.7%Ungraded 429 · 54.1%Very low 137 · 17.3%Low 53 · 6.7%Moderate 14 · 1.8%High 12 · 1.5%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Systemic oral acyclovir vs Placebo or no treatment
Adverse effects · Children and young adults under 25 years with primary herpetic gingivostomatitis (with or without herpes labialis)
Acyclovir for treating primary herpetic gingivostomatitis (2008) · Cochrane
Amir 1997b: two children in each group (2 vs 2) had mild gastrointestinal symptoms that resolved spontaneously after 24 to 48 hours without a change in study treatment. Ducoulombier 1988: no significant adverse effects…2 studiesUngraded
Occlusal intervention as an adjunct to periodontal therapy vs Sham (placebo) occlusal intervention as an adjunct to periodontal therapy
Outcome NR · Adults (aged 18 years or older) with a clinical diagnosis of (chronic) periodontitis · Minimum 3 months (planned)
Occlusal interventions for periodontitis in adults (2008) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Systemic oral acyclovir vs Placebo or no treatment
Quality of life (assessed by a validated questionnaire) · Children and young adults under 25 years with primary herpetic gingivostomatitis (with or without herpes labialis)
Acyclovir for treating primary herpetic gingivostomatitis (2008) · Cochrane
No data were available in either included study (Amir 1997b; Ducoulombier 1988).NRNo studies
Systemic oral acyclovir vs Placebo or no treatment
Pain/discomfort (time to resolution of pain) · Children and young adults under 25 years with primary herpetic gingivostomatitis (with or without herpes labialis)
Acyclovir for treating primary herpetic gingivostomatitis (2008) · Cochrane
Amir 1997b: no data available. Ducoulombier 1988: time to resolution of pain, acyclovir (1 day=1, 2 days=1, 3 days=3, 4 days=3, 5 days=1, persistent=0) vs placebo (1 day=0, 2 days=0, 3 days=1, 4 days=2, 5 days=4,…1 study · 18 participantsUngraded
Occlusal adjustment as an adjunct to surgical periodontal therapy vs Surgical periodontal therapy alone (no occlusal adjustment)
Probing (pocket) depth change (difference in mean reduction, mm) · Adults (aged 18 years or older) with a clinical diagnosis of (chronic) periodontitis · 2 years
Occlusal interventions for periodontitis in adults (2008) · Cochrane
MD 0.01 [-0.20, 0.22]1 study · 50 participantsUngraded
Occlusal adjustment as an adjunct to non-surgical periodontal therapy vs Non-surgical periodontal therapy alone (no occlusal adjustment)
Clinical attachment level change (mean gain, mm) · Adults (aged 18 years or older) with a clinical diagnosis of (chronic) periodontitis · 2 years
Occlusal interventions for periodontitis in adults (2008) · Cochrane
MD 0.38 [0.04, 0.72]1 study · 50 participantsUngraded
Psychological intervention based on a specified psychological model/theory (to increase adherence to oral hygiene instructions) vs No (active) intervention (usual/standard dental care or no-treatment control)
Observed flossing skill · Adults (aged 18 or over) diagnosed with periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis) · 4 months
Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal… (2007) · Cochrane
Little 1997 observed and rated participants on flossing skill; Analysis of Covariance found a significant difference favouring the intervention group.1 study · 107 participantsUngraded
Psychological intervention based on a specified psychological model/theory (to increase adherence to oral hygiene instructions) vs No (active) intervention (usual/standard dental care or no-treatment control)
Plaque score · Adults (aged 18 or over) diagnosed with periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis)
Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal… (2007) · Cochrane
The impact of psychological interventions on clinical markers was assessed in three studies (Little 1997; Stewart 1991; Weinstein 1996). All three found that psychological interventions resulted in improved plaque…3 studiesUngraded
Psychological intervention based on a specified psychological model/theory (to increase adherence to oral hygiene instructions) vs No (active) intervention (usual/standard dental care or no-treatment control)
Self-efficacy beliefs (flossing) · Adults (aged 18 or over) diagnosed with periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis)
Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal… (2007) · Cochrane
Stewart 1996: the psychological intervention group demonstrated significantly higher change in self efficacy scores for flossing at post-intervention compared to the other two groups (control and educational). Flossing…1 study · 117 participantsUngraded
Psychological intervention based on a specified psychological model/theory (to increase adherence to oral hygiene instructions) vs Attention control (attention/contact without an active psychological intervention)
Plaque score · Adults (aged 18 or over) diagnosed with periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis)
Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal… (2007) · Cochrane
Weinstein 1996 reported that the psychological intervention led to improvements in plaque score greater than that noted in the attention control group; however the sample size in each arm was very small (n=5) and the…2 studiesUngraded
Psychological intervention based on a specified psychological model/theory (to increase adherence to oral hygiene instructions) vs No (active) intervention (usual/standard dental care or no-treatment control)
Pocket (probing) depth · Adults (aged 18 or over) diagnosed with periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis) · 4 months
Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal… (2007) · Cochrane
Little 1997: no change in pocket depth; there were no differences between the intervention and control groups in overall change in pocket depth. (Some analyses suggested greater change in the intervention group when…1 study · 107 participantsUngraded
Psychological intervention based on a specified psychological model/theory (to increase adherence to oral hygiene instructions) vs No (active) intervention (usual/standard dental care or no-treatment control)
Gingival bleeding · Adults (aged 18 or over) diagnosed with periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis) · 4 months
Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal… (2007) · Cochrane
Little 1997 reported decreased gingival bleeding in the active intervention group: gingival bleeding present in 9% of the intervention group at baseline and 4% at 4-month follow up, versus 10% of the control group on…1 study · 107 participantsUngraded
Psychological intervention based on a specified psychological model/theory (to increase adherence to oral hygiene instructions) vs No (active) intervention (usual/standard dental care or no-treatment control)
Attachment loss · Adults (aged 18 or over) diagnosed with periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis) · 4 months
Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal… (2007) · Cochrane
Little 1997: no change in attachment loss; no differences between the intervention and control groups in overall change in attachment (loss of attachment) markers.1 study · 107 participantsUngraded
Psychological intervention based on a specified psychological model/theory (to increase adherence to oral hygiene instructions) vs Attention control (attention/contact without an active psychological intervention)
Self-reported flossing · Adults (aged 18 or over) diagnosed with periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis) · 5 weeks (2 weeks post-intervention)
Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal… (2007) · Cochrane
Stewart 1991: there were no differences between the attention control group and the cognitive behavioural (psychological) intervention group for self reported flossing; it cannot be concluded that the cognitive…1 study · 50 participantsUngraded
Psychological intervention based on a specified psychological model/theory (to increase adherence to oral hygiene instructions) vs No (active) intervention (usual/standard dental care or no-treatment control)
Observed tooth brushing skill · Adults (aged 18 or over) diagnosed with periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis) · 4 months
Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal… (2007) · Cochrane
Little 1997 observed and rated participants on brushing skill; Analysis of Covariance found a significant difference favouring the intervention group (one of four measures on which significant differences were found…1 study · 107 participantsUngraded
Psychological intervention based on a specified psychological model/theory (to increase adherence to oral hygiene instructions) vs No (active) intervention (usual/standard dental care or no-treatment control)
Dental knowledge · Adults (aged 18 or over) diagnosed with periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis)
Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal… (2007) · Cochrane
Stewart 1996: for dental knowledge the control group showed no change pre- and post-intervention, whereas the psychological intervention group improved dental knowledge significantly (both intervention groups improved…1 study · 117 participantsUngraded
Psychological intervention based on a specified psychological model/theory (to increase adherence to oral hygiene instructions) vs Educational intervention (oral hygiene education/instruction)
Self-reported tooth brushing · Adults (aged 18 or over) diagnosed with periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis) · 5 weeks (2 weeks post-intervention)
Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal… (2007) · Cochrane
Stewart 1991: for self reported brushing only the comparison of the control group with the cognitive behavioural intervention was significant; the cognitive behavioural (psychological) intervention showed no…1 study · 50 participantsUngraded
Psychological intervention based on a specified psychological model/theory (to increase adherence to oral hygiene instructions) vs No (active) intervention (usual/standard dental care or no-treatment control)
Self-efficacy beliefs (tooth brushing) · Adults (aged 18 or over) diagnosed with periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis)
Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal… (2007) · Cochrane
Stewart 1996: the psychological intervention had no discernible effect on self efficacy beliefs concerning tooth brushing; the data on perceived self efficacy for tooth brushing were not analysed due to ceiling effects…1 study · 117 participantsUngraded
Psychological intervention based on a specified psychological model/theory (to increase adherence to oral hygiene instructions) vs No (active) intervention (usual/standard dental care or no-treatment control)
Self-reported flossing · Adults (aged 18 or over) diagnosed with periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis)
Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal… (2007) · Cochrane
Self assessed flossing was assessed in two studies (Little 1997; Stewart 1991); both reported improvements for the intervention groups. Little 1997: Analysis of Covariance found significant differences favouring the…2 studiesUngraded
Psychological intervention based on a specified psychological model/theory (to increase adherence to oral hygiene instructions) vs Attention control (attention/contact without an active psychological intervention)
Self-reported tooth brushing · Adults (aged 18 or over) diagnosed with periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis) · 5 weeks (2 weeks post-intervention)
Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal… (2007) · Cochrane
Stewart 1991: for self reported brushing only the comparison of the control group with the cognitive behavioural intervention was significant; the cognitive behavioural (psychological) intervention conveyed no…1 study · 50 participantsUngraded
Psychological intervention based on a specified psychological model/theory (to increase adherence to oral hygiene instructions) vs Educational intervention (oral hygiene education/instruction)
Plaque score · Adults (aged 18 or over) diagnosed with periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis) · 5 weeks (2 weeks post-intervention)
Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal… (2007) · Cochrane
Stewart 1991: while the educational intervention group and the cognitive behavioural intervention group both showed significant differences compared to the control group in plaque scores, the cognitive behavioural…1 study · 50 participantsUngraded
Psychological intervention based on a specified psychological model/theory (to increase adherence to oral hygiene instructions) vs Educational intervention (oral hygiene education/instruction)
Self-reported flossing · Adults (aged 18 or over) diagnosed with periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis) · 5 weeks (2 weeks post-intervention)
Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal… (2007) · Cochrane
Stewart 1991: there were no differences between the educational intervention group and the cognitive behavioural (psychological) intervention group for self reported flossing; improvements in flossing could not be…1 study · 50 participantsUngraded
Psychological intervention based on a specified psychological model/theory (to increase adherence to oral hygiene instructions) vs No (active) intervention (usual/standard dental care or no-treatment control)
Self-reported tooth brushing · Adults (aged 18 or over) diagnosed with periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis)
Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal… (2007) · Cochrane
Self assessed brushing was assessed in two studies (Little 1997; Stewart 1991); both found the intervention groups reported improved brushing. Little 1997: Analysis of Covariance found significant differences favouring…2 studiesUngraded
Psychological intervention based on a specified psychological model/theory (to increase adherence to oral hygiene instructions) vs Educational intervention (oral hygiene education/instruction)
Dental knowledge · Adults (aged 18 or over) diagnosed with periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis)
Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal… (2007) · Cochrane
Stewart 1996: there was no difference in change in dental knowledge at post-intervention between the educational and psychological groups (both improved significantly relative to control).1 study · 78 participantsUngraded
Psychological intervention based on a specified psychological model/theory (to increase adherence to oral hygiene instructions) vs Educational intervention (oral hygiene education/instruction)
Self-efficacy beliefs (flossing) · Adults (aged 18 or over) diagnosed with periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis)
Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal… (2007) · Cochrane
Stewart 1996: the psychological intervention group demonstrated significantly higher change in self efficacy scores for flossing at post-intervention compared to the educational group (there was no difference in the…1 study · 78 participantsUngraded
Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with barrier membrane (resorbable or non-resorbable) vs Open flap debridement (access flap surgery)
Sites failing to gain 2 mm attachment (proportion) · Patients with chronic periodontitis (aged 21 years or older) with periodontal infra-bony defects; furcation-involved… · >=12 months
Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects (2006) · Cochrane
RR 0.54 [0.31, 0.96]6 studiesUngraded
Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with barrier membrane (resorbable or non-resorbable) vs Open flap debridement (access flap surgery)
Aesthetics (patient's opinion) · Patients with chronic periodontitis (aged 21 years or older) with periodontal infra-bony defects; furcation-involved…
Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects (2006) · Cochrane
No data were found for this outcome (listed under 'Other outcomes: No data were found for the following outcomes').0 studiesNo studies
Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with barrier membrane (resorbable or non-resorbable) vs Open flap debridement (access flap surgery)
Change in gingival recession · Patients with chronic periodontitis (aged 21 years or older) with periodontal infra-bony defects; furcation-involved… · >=12 months
Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects (2006) · Cochrane
MD 0.26 [0.08, 0.43]9 studiesUngraded
Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with barrier membrane (resorbable or non-resorbable) vs Open flap debridement (access flap surgery)
Treatment / surgical procedure time · Patients with chronic periodontitis (aged 21 years or older) with periodontal infra-bony defects; furcation-involved…
Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects (2006) · Cochrane
MD 23.91 studyUngraded
Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with barrier membrane (resorbable or non-resorbable) vs Open flap debridement (access flap surgery)
Change in clinical attachment level (attachment gain) · Patients with chronic periodontitis (aged 21 years or older) with periodontal infra-bony defects; furcation-involved… · >=12 months
Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects (2006) · Cochrane
MD 1.22 [0.80, 1.64]16 studiesUngraded
Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with barrier membrane (resorbable or non-resorbable) vs Open flap debridement (access flap surgery)
Hard tissue probing at surgical re-entry (bone gain) · Patients with chronic periodontitis (aged 21 years or older) with periodontal infra-bony defects; furcation-involved… · >=12 months
Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects (2006) · Cochrane
MD 1.39 [1.08, 1.71]3 studiesUngraded
Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with barrier membrane (resorbable or non-resorbable) vs Open flap debridement (access flap surgery)
Cost/benefit (treatment time plus estimated material costs) · Patients with chronic periodontitis (aged 21 years or older) with periodontal infra-bony defects; furcation-involved…
Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects (2006) · Cochrane
No data were found for this outcome (listed under 'Other outcomes: No data were found for the following outcomes').0 studiesNo studies
Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) combined with bone substitutes/graft vs Open flap debridement (access flap surgery)
Hard tissue probing at surgical re-entry (bone gain) · Patients with chronic periodontitis (aged 21 years or older) with periodontal infra-bony defects; furcation-involved… · >=12 months
Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects (2006) · Cochrane
MD 3.37 [3.14, 3.61]1 studyUngraded
Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with barrier membrane (resorbable or non-resorbable) vs Open flap debridement (access flap surgery)
Radiographic bone change · Patients with chronic periodontitis (aged 21 years or older) with periodontal infra-bony defects; furcation-involved… · >=12 months
Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects (2006) · Cochrane
Radiographic data was contained in two studies. Mayfield 1998 showed 0.6 mm gain in bone from the base of the defect in both test and control groups; Ratka-Kruger 2000 reported descriptively that only minute changes in…2 studiesUngraded
Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with barrier membrane (resorbable or non-resorbable) vs Open flap debridement (access flap surgery)
Tooth loss · Patients with chronic periodontitis (aged 21 years or older) with periodontal infra-bony defects; furcation-involved…
Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects (2006) · Cochrane
No tooth loss was reported in any study although these data are incomplete where patient follow-up was not complete (no events; no estimable effect).17 studiesUngraded
Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) combined with bone substitutes/graft vs Open flap debridement (access flap surgery)
Change in clinical attachment level (attachment gain) · Patients with chronic periodontitis (aged 21 years or older) with periodontal infra-bony defects; furcation-involved… · >=12 months
Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects (2006) · Cochrane
MD 1.25 [0.89, 1.61]2 studiesUngraded
Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with barrier membrane (resorbable or non-resorbable) vs Open flap debridement (access flap surgery)
Change in probing depth (probing depth reduction) · Patients with chronic periodontitis (aged 21 years or older) with periodontal infra-bony defects; furcation-involved… · >=12 months
Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects (2006) · Cochrane
MD 1.21 [0.53, 1.88]11 studiesUngraded
Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with barrier membrane (resorbable or non-resorbable) vs Open flap debridement (access flap surgery)
Disease recurrence (% sites with >=2 mm loss of probing attachment from 12 months after treatment) · Patients with chronic periodontitis (aged 21 years or older) with periodontal infra-bony defects; furcation-involved…
Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects (2006) · Cochrane
No data were found for this outcome (listed under 'Other outcomes: No data were found for the following outcomes').0 studiesNo studies
Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with barrier membrane (resorbable or non-resorbable) vs Open flap debridement (access flap surgery)
Ease of maintenance (% of sites with <4 mm probing depth) · Patients with chronic periodontitis (aged 21 years or older) with periodontal infra-bony defects; furcation-involved…
Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects (2006) · Cochrane
No data were found for this outcome (listed under 'Other outcomes: No data were found for the following outcomes').0 studiesNo studies
Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) combined with bone substitutes/graft vs Open flap debridement (access flap surgery)
Change in probing depth (probing depth reduction) · Patients with chronic periodontitis (aged 21 years or older) with periodontal infra-bony defects; furcation-involved… · >=12 months
Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects (2006) · Cochrane
MD 1.24 [0.89, 1.59]2 studiesUngraded
Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) combined with bone substitutes/graft vs Open flap debridement (access flap surgery)
Change in gingival recession · Patients with chronic periodontitis (aged 21 years or older) with periodontal infra-bony defects; furcation-involved… · >=12 months
Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects (2006) · Cochrane
MD -0.33 [-0.43, -0.23]1 studyUngraded
Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with barrier membrane (resorbable or non-resorbable) vs Open flap debridement (access flap surgery)
Patient well-being / quality of life · Patients with chronic periodontitis (aged 21 years or older) with periodontal infra-bony defects; furcation-involved…
Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects (2006) · Cochrane
Cortellini 2001: 36% of GTR patients reported the procedure interfered with daily activity for an average of 2.7 days versus 32% of controls for an average of 2.4 days; no significant difference for postoperative pain…1 studyUngraded
Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with barrier membrane (resorbable or non-resorbable) vs Open flap debridement (access flap surgery)
Post-operative complications / adverse effects (including pain, infection) · Patients with chronic periodontitis (aged 21 years or older) with periodontal infra-bony defects; furcation-involved…
Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects (2006) · Cochrane
Adverse effects were generally minor. Healing was generally uneventful for both test and control groups. Exposure of the GTR barrier membrane was widely reported, ranging from 20% of sites (non-resorbable…16 studiesUngraded