Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

866 questions in 43 reviews · Oral and maxillofacial surgery

current versions
No studies 188 · 21.7%Ungraded 548 · 63.3%Very low 81 · 9.4%Low 37 · 4.3%Moderate 8 · 0.9%High 4 · 0.5%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Topical capsaicin (0.025% cream) vs Placebo
Pain on daily activity (VAS) · Adult patients aged >=18 years, clinically or radiographically diagnosed with TMD (McNeill 1997 criteria); moderate to… · 4 weeks
Pharmacological interventions for pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders (2010) · Cochrane
MD -1.12 [-3.12, 0.88]1 study · 30 participantsUngraded
Oral cyclobenzaprine (muscle relaxant) vs Placebo
Adverse events (reported; mild, no withdrawals) · Adult patients aged >=18 years, clinically or radiographically diagnosed with TMD (McNeill 1997 criteria); moderate to… · 3 weeks
Pharmacological interventions for pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders (2010) · Cochrane
Herman et al 2002 (cyclobenzaprine) reported adverse effects. Per the review's Adverse effects of interventions section: 'All but one study (Lobo et al 2004) reported adverse effects. Most of the reported adverse…1 study · 41 participantsUngraded
Oral celecoxib (COX-2 inhibitor) vs Placebo
Pain intensity (VAS) · Adult patients aged >=18 years, clinically or radiographically diagnosed with TMD (McNeill 1997 criteria); moderate to… · 6 weeks
Pharmacological interventions for pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders (2010) · Cochrane
MD 0.03 [-0.40, 0.45]1 study · 68 participantsUngraded
Topical capsaicin (0.025% cream) vs Placebo
Maximum pain while on medication (VAS) · Adult patients aged >=18 years, clinically or radiographically diagnosed with TMD (McNeill 1997 criteria); moderate to… · 4 weeks
Pharmacological interventions for pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders (2010) · Cochrane
MD -0.91 [-2.89, 1.07]1 study · 30 participantsUngraded
Oral naproxen (NSAID) vs Placebo
Pain intensity (VAS) · Adult patients aged >=18 years, clinically or radiographically diagnosed with TMD (McNeill 1997 criteria); moderate to… · 6 weeks
Pharmacological interventions for pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders (2010) · Cochrane
MD -1.70 [-2.14, -1.25]1 study · 68 participantsUngraded
Immediate implants (placed in a fresh extraction socket just after tooth extraction) vs Delayed implants (placed at least 2 months after extraction, in healed bone)
Aesthetics assessed by dentist: position of the perimplant tissues · Patients with compromised teeth to be extracted who require single dental implants in fresh postextraction sockets · 1 year
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane
One year after placement, there were no statistically significant differences for the level of the perimplant marginal mucosa in relation to that of the adjacent teeth (Lindeboom 2006).1 study · 50 participantsUngraded
Oral diclofenac sodium (NSAID) vs Placebo
Tenderness on palpation of three or more masticatory muscles · Adult patients aged >=18 years, clinically or radiographically diagnosed with TMD (McNeill 1997 criteria); moderate to… · 2 weeks
Pharmacological interventions for pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders (2010) · Cochrane
RR 0.75 [0.34, 1.67]1 study · 32 participantsUngraded
Oral glucosamine hydrochloride/chondroitin sulphate vs Placebo
Adverse events (withdrawals due to adverse effects) · Adult patients aged >=18 years, clinically or radiographically diagnosed with TMD (McNeill 1997 criteria); moderate to… · 3 months
Pharmacological interventions for pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders (2010) · Cochrane
Two allergic reactions and one severe abdominal pain led to three withdrawals from the intervention group in the study by Nguyen et al 2001.1 study · 45 participantsUngraded
Oral naproxen (NSAID) vs Placebo
Adverse events (reported; mild, no withdrawals) · Adult patients aged >=18 years, clinically or radiographically diagnosed with TMD (McNeill 1997 criteria); moderate to… · 6 weeks
Pharmacological interventions for pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders (2010) · Cochrane
Ta and Dionne 2004 (naproxen) reported adverse effects. Per the review: 'All but one study (Lobo et al 2004) reported adverse effects. Most of the reported adverse effects were mild and similar to the adverse effects…1 study · 68 participantsUngraded
Resorbable barrier (guided bone regeneration) vs Non-resorbable barrier (guided bone regeneration)
Major complications at the implant/donor site · Patients receiving immediate single implants in fresh extraction sockets (maxillary anterior/premolar sites) · up to 2 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane
Four complications occurred: two dehiscences in the resorbable group; one abscess and one dehiscence in the resorbable + autogenous bone group; none in the non-resorbable group. No statistically significant differences…1 study · 23 participantsUngraded
Oral celecoxib (COX-2 inhibitor) vs Placebo
Adverse events (reported; mild, no withdrawals) · Adult patients aged >=18 years, clinically or radiographically diagnosed with TMD (McNeill 1997 criteria); moderate to… · 6 weeks
Pharmacological interventions for pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders (2010) · Cochrane
Ta and Dionne 2004 (celecoxib) reported adverse effects. Per the review: 'All but one study (Lobo et al 2004) reported adverse effects. Most of the reported adverse effects were mild and similar to the adverse effects…1 study · 68 participantsUngraded
Oral propranolol (beta-blocker) vs Placebo
Reduction in pain intensity rating · Adult patients aged >=18 years, clinically or radiographically diagnosed with TMD (McNeill 1997 criteria); moderate to… · 1 week per period (cross-over)
Pharmacological interventions for pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders (2010) · Cochrane
Tchivileva et al 2010: Reduction in pain intensity rating (primary outcome) comparing propranolol treatment to placebo treatment did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.104); pairwise differences between…1 study · 40 participantsUngraded
Immediate-delayed implants (placed within 8 weeks after tooth extraction) vs Delayed implants (placed at least 2 months after extraction)
Prosthesis failure · Patients with compromised teeth to be extracted who require single dental implants in fresh postextraction sockets · up to 5 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane
After 2 years (and up to 5 years) there were no statistically significant differences for prosthesis failures (Schropp 2003).1 study · 46 participantsUngraded
Oral clonazepam (benzodiazepine) vs Placebo
Adverse events (withdrawals due to adverse effects) · Adult patients aged >=18 years, clinically or radiographically diagnosed with TMD (McNeill 1997 criteria); moderate to… · 60 days
Pharmacological interventions for pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders (2010) · Cochrane
One participant in the clonazepam group withdrew from the study by Harkins et al 1991 due to severe headache.1 study · 20 participantsUngraded
Autogenous bone graft augmentation at the immediate implant site vs No augmentation
Major complications at the implant/donor site · Patients receiving immediate single implants in fresh extraction sockets (maxillary anterior/premolar sites) · up to 2 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane
Two complications occurred in the group treated with autogenous bone (one abscess that determined the early failure of the implant and one wound dehiscence); none in the control group.1 study · 26 participantsUngraded
Oral glucosamine hydrochloride/chondroitin sulphate vs Placebo
Pain intensity (VAS) · Adult patients aged >=18 years, clinically or radiographically diagnosed with TMD (McNeill 1997 criteria); moderate to… · 3 months
Pharmacological interventions for pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders (2010) · Cochrane
MD -0.70 [-2.16, 0.76]1 study · 45 participantsUngraded
Oral diclofenac sodium (NSAID) vs Placebo
Severe or very severe symptoms · Adult patients aged >=18 years, clinically or radiographically diagnosed with TMD (McNeill 1997 criteria); moderate to… · 2 weeks
Pharmacological interventions for pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders (2010) · Cochrane
RR 0.88 [0.42, 1.84]1 study · 32 participantsUngraded
Topical capsaicin (0.025% cream) vs Placebo
Present pain of TMD (VAS) · Adult patients aged >=18 years, clinically or radiographically diagnosed with TMD (McNeill 1997 criteria); moderate to… · 4 weeks
Pharmacological interventions for pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders (2010) · Cochrane
MD -0.61 [-2.45, 1.23]1 study · 30 participantsUngraded
Immediate implants (placed just after tooth extraction) vs Immediate-delayed implants (placed within 8 weeks after tooth extraction)
Perimplant marginal bone level changes · Patients with compromised teeth to be extracted who require single dental implants in fresh postextraction sockets · 2 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane
No statistically significant differences for perimplant marginal bone level changes (Analysis 3.2; Palattella 2008).1 study · 16 participantsUngraded
Oral diazepam (benzodiazepine) vs Placebo
Number of participants with severe dysfunction (pain of TMD not improved) · Adult patients aged >=18 years, clinically or radiographically diagnosed with TMD (McNeill 1997 criteria); moderate to… · 15 days
Pharmacological interventions for pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders (2010) · Cochrane
RR 0.67 [0.27, 1.66]1 study · 41 participantsUngraded
Immediate implants (placed in a fresh extraction socket just after tooth extraction) vs Delayed implants (placed at least 2 months after extraction, in healed bone)
Implant failure · Patients with compromised teeth to be extracted who require single dental implants in fresh postextraction sockets · 1 year
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane
RR 4.33 [0.76, 24.56]2 studies · 110 participantsUngraded
Autogenous bone graft augmentation at the immediate implant site vs No augmentation
Bone gain (vertical - VDH) · Patients receiving immediate single implants in fresh extraction sockets (maxillary anterior/premolar sites) · up to 2 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane
Both treatments resulted in statistically significant bone gain, however no statistically significant differences were found between the two procedures for vertical height of the defect (VDH) (Chen 2005b).1 study · 26 participantsUngraded
Immediate-delayed implants (placed within 8 weeks after tooth extraction) vs Delayed implants (placed at least 2 months after extraction)
Patients' general satisfaction of treatment · Patients with compromised teeth to be extracted who require single dental implants in fresh postextraction sockets · 2 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane
MD 6.51 [0.39, 12.63]1 study · 44 participantsUngraded
Oral piroxicam (NSAID) vs Placebo
Adverse events (reported; mild, no withdrawals) · Adult patients aged >=18 years, clinically or radiographically diagnosed with TMD (McNeill 1997 criteria); moderate to… · 15 days
Pharmacological interventions for pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders (2010) · Cochrane
Roldan et al 1990 (piroxicam) reported adverse effects. Per the review's Adverse effects of interventions section: 'All but one study (Lobo et al 2004) reported adverse effects. Most of the reported adverse effects…1 study · 41 participantsUngraded
Bio-Oss (anorganic bovine bone) vs Bio-Oss + resorbable barrier
Poor aesthetics measured by patient (after restoration) · Patients receiving immediate single implants in fresh extraction sockets (maxillary anterior/premolar sites) · up to 3 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane
After delivery of the prostheses one patient in each group was dissatisfied with aesthetics (1/10 vs 1/10); no statistically significant difference (Chen 2007).1 study · 20 participantsUngraded
Immediate-delayed implants (placed within 8 weeks after tooth extraction) vs Delayed implants (placed at least 2 months after extraction)
Patients' perception of how long treatment took · Patients with compromised teeth to be extracted who require single dental implants in fresh postextraction sockets · 2 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane
MD -20.30 [-33.36, -7.24]1 study · 44 participantsUngraded
Autogenous bone graft augmentation at the immediate implant site vs No augmentation
Bone gain (horizontal - HDD) · Patients receiving immediate single implants in fresh extraction sockets (maxillary anterior/premolar sites) · up to 2 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane
No statistically significant differences between the two procedures for horizontal depth of the defect (HDD) (Chen 2005b).1 study · 26 participantsUngraded
Orthodontic treatment with appliances inducing stable, permanent orthodontic tooth movement (splints worn 8 to 12 weeks and surgical interventions excluded) vs Control: no treatment, placebo, or reassurance
Development of TMD (onset/incidence of signs and symptoms) · People without TMD at baseline undergoing orthodontic treatment (TMD clinically absent at baseline); no age… · Follow-up period extended into adulthood
Orthodontics for treating temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Oral prazepam (benzodiazepine) vs Placebo
Adverse events (reported; mild, no withdrawals) · Adult patients aged >=18 years, clinically or radiographically diagnosed with TMD (McNeill 1997 criteria); moderate to… · 8 days
Pharmacological interventions for pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders (2010) · Cochrane
Rossi et al 1983 (prazepam) reported adverse effects. Per the review's Adverse effects of interventions section: 'All but one study (Lobo et al 2004) reported adverse effects. Most of the reported adverse effects were…1 study · 83 participantsUngraded
Orthodontic treatment with appliances inducing stable, permanent orthodontic tooth movement (splints worn 8 to 12 weeks and surgical interventions excluded) vs Control: no treatment, placebo, or reassurance
Overall symptoms, pain and headache (relief from symptoms assessed by global measures) · Adults aged 18 years or older with clinically diagnosed TMD (exhibiting two or more of the listed signs and/or symptoms) · At least 6 months after the intervention
Orthodontics for treating temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Bio-Oss (anorganic bovine bone) vs Bio-Oss + resorbable barrier
Augmentation (prosthesis/implant) failure · Patients receiving immediate single implants in fresh extraction sockets (maxillary anterior/premolar sites) · up to 3 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane
There were no prosthesis or implant failures in either group (Bio-Oss vs Bio-Oss + resorbable barrier; Chen 2007); not estimable.1 study · 20 participantsUngraded
Bio-Oss (anorganic bovine bone) vs Bio-Oss + resorbable barrier
Poor aesthetics measured by dentist (3 years) · Patients receiving immediate single implants in fresh extraction sockets (maxillary anterior/premolar sites) · 3 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane
After 3 years of loading, the operator judged aesthetics to be poor in 2/7 patients of the Bio-Oss group and in 2/5 of the Bio-Oss plus barrier group; no statistically significant difference.1 study · 20 participantsUngraded
Oral diclofenac sodium (NSAID) vs Placebo
Daily pain (not improved) · Adult patients aged >=18 years, clinically or radiographically diagnosed with TMD (McNeill 1997 criteria); moderate to… · 2 weeks
Pharmacological interventions for pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders (2010) · Cochrane
RR 0.71 [0.49, 1.04]1 study · 32 participantsUngraded
Primary surgical intervention (curettage, peripheral osteotomy, or resection) vs Primary non-surgical intervention (intralesional corticosteroids, subcutaneous calcitonin, interferon alpha, or imatinib)
Overall survival · Patients with a pathological diagnosis of central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) of the jaws
Interventions for central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) of the jaws (2009) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Calcitonin (salmon calcitonin nasal spray 200 IU/day) vs Placebo
Increase in volume of more than 10% compared to the pretreatment measurement · Patients with histologically confirmed CGCG in one or both jaws and normal serum calcium and parathyroid hormone (PTH)… · 3 months
Interventions for central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) of the jaws (2009) · Cochrane
RR 3.0 [0.40, 22.30]1 study · 14 participantsUngraded
Bioresorbable plates or screws (or both) vs Titanium plates or screws (used as lag screws) or both
Quality of life (validated questionnaire) · Participants over 18 years of age with fractures of the facial skeleton including the mandible, maxilla, zygoma… · Up to 3 years postoperatively
Resorbable versus titanium plates for facial fractures (2009) · Cochrane
Planned secondary outcome not assessed: none of the retrieved studies met the inclusion criteria, so no data were available for analysis. Verbatim (Effects of interventions): "Although 53 studies were retrieved in our…0 studiesNo studies
Primary surgical intervention (curettage, peripheral osteotomy, or resection) vs Primary non-surgical intervention (intralesional corticosteroids, subcutaneous calcitonin, interferon alpha, or imatinib)
Disease-free survival · Patients with a pathological diagnosis of central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) of the jaws
Interventions for central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) of the jaws (2009) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Primary surgical intervention (curettage, peripheral osteotomy, or resection) vs Primary non-surgical intervention (intralesional corticosteroids, subcutaneous calcitonin, interferon alpha, or imatinib)
Resectability · Patients with a pathological diagnosis of central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) of the jaws
Interventions for central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) of the jaws (2009) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Primary surgical intervention (curettage, peripheral osteotomy, or resection) vs Primary non-surgical intervention (intralesional corticosteroids, subcutaneous calcitonin, interferon alpha, or imatinib)
Quality of life · Patients with a pathological diagnosis of central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) of the jaws
Interventions for central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) of the jaws (2009) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Calcitonin (salmon calcitonin nasal spray 200 IU/day) vs Placebo
Adverse events · Patients with histologically confirmed CGCG in one or both jaws and normal serum calcium and parathyroid hormone (PTH)…
Interventions for central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) of the jaws (2009) · Cochrane
Adverse events were not described separately for each group. Trialists reported that adverse events were in most patients minimal and consisted of nausea, flushes and some dizziness. One patient had diarrhoea which…1 study · 14 participantsUngraded
Bioresorbable plates or screws (or both) vs Titanium plates or screws (used as lag screws) or both
Postoperative swelling assessment · Participants over 18 years of age with fractures of the facial skeleton including the mandible, maxilla, zygoma… · 0 to 48 hours after surgery
Resorbable versus titanium plates for facial fractures (2009) · Cochrane
Planned secondary outcome not assessed: none of the retrieved studies met the inclusion criteria, so no data were available for analysis. Verbatim (Effects of interventions): "Although 53 studies were retrieved in our…0 studiesNo studies
Arthrocentesis and lavage vs Arthroscopy
Adverse reactions · Adults with temporomandibular joint disorders (internal derangement; anterior disc displacement with or without… · 1 year
Arthrocentesis and lavage for treating temporomandibular joint disorders (2009) · Cochrane
Only Goudot 2000 reported adverse reactions. Arthroscopy group: one transient frontal palsy (during 3 months); one cervico-facial oedema requiring prolonged intubation (12 hours). Arthrocentesis group: two severe…1 study · 62 participantsUngraded
Bioresorbable plates or screws (or both) vs Titanium plates or screws (used as lag screws) or both
Degree of function postoperatively (mastication, swallowing, speech) · Participants over 18 years of age with fractures of the facial skeleton including the mandible, maxilla, zygoma… · Up to 3 years postoperatively
Resorbable versus titanium plates for facial fractures (2009) · Cochrane
Planned primary outcome not assessed: none of the retrieved studies met the inclusion criteria, so no data were available for analysis. Verbatim (Effects of interventions): "Although 53 studies were retrieved in our…0 studiesNo studies
Arthrocentesis and lavage vs Arthroscopy
Overall success (compound score combining pain and MIO) · Adults with temporomandibular joint disorders (internal derangement; anterior disc displacement with or without… · 6 to 24 months
Arthrocentesis and lavage for treating temporomandibular joint disorders (2009) · Cochrane
RR 0.92 [0.56, 1.49]1 study · 19 participantsUngraded
Bioresorbable plates or screws (or both) vs Titanium plates or screws (used as lag screws) or both
Adverse effects (insufficient fixation; re-operation/revision; plate exposure; superficial or deep wound infection; sinus tract; wound dehiscence; giant cell/foreign body or inflammatory reaction; post-traumatic dystrophy) · Participants over 18 years of age with fractures of the facial skeleton including the mandible, maxilla, zygoma… · Up to 3 years postoperatively
Resorbable versus titanium plates for facial fractures (2009) · Cochrane
Planned adverse-effects outcome not assessed: none of the retrieved studies met the inclusion criteria, so no data were available for analysis. Verbatim (Effects of interventions): "Although 53 studies were retrieved…0 studiesNo studies
Arthrocentesis and lavage vs Arthroscopy
Temporomandibular joint tenderness · Adults with temporomandibular joint disorders (internal derangement; anterior disc displacement with or without…
Arthrocentesis and lavage for treating temporomandibular joint disorders (2009) · Cochrane
To date, no randomised controlled trial in this area reported temporomandibular joint tenderness.0 studiesNo studies
Arthrocentesis and lavage vs Arthroscopy
Quality of life · Adults with temporomandibular joint disorders (internal derangement; anterior disc displacement with or without…
Arthrocentesis and lavage for treating temporomandibular joint disorders (2009) · Cochrane
No data about quality of life were reported by the included trials.0 studiesNo studies
Arthrocentesis and lavage vs Arthroscopy
Deviation of the mandible · Adults with temporomandibular joint disorders (internal derangement; anterior disc displacement with or without…
Arthrocentesis and lavage for treating temporomandibular joint disorders (2009) · Cochrane
To date, no randomised controlled trial in this area reported deviation of the mandible.0 studiesNo studies
Arthrocentesis and lavage vs Arthroscopy
Pain (VAS) · Adults with temporomandibular joint disorders (internal derangement; anterior disc displacement with or without… · 24 months
Arthrocentesis and lavage for treating temporomandibular joint disorders (2009) · Cochrane
MD -1.00 [-2.12, 0.12]1 study · 62 participantsUngraded
Bioresorbable plates or screws (or both) vs Titanium plates or screws (used as lag screws) or both
Patient satisfaction (questionnaire) · Participants over 18 years of age with fractures of the facial skeleton including the mandible, maxilla, zygoma… · Up to 3 years postoperatively
Resorbable versus titanium plates for facial fractures (2009) · Cochrane
Planned secondary outcome not assessed: none of the retrieved studies met the inclusion criteria, so no data were available for analysis. Verbatim (Effects of interventions): "Although 53 studies were retrieved in our…0 studiesNo studies