Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,080 questions in 109 reviews · Acute Respiratory Infections

current versions
No studies 132 · 12.2%Ungraded 90 · 8.3%Very low 169 · 15.6%Low 306 · 28.3%Moderate 287 · 26.6%High 96 · 8.9%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Xylitol vs control
Antibiotic administration ‐ not measured · preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age
Xylitol for preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Xylitol vs control
Hospitalisation ‐ not reported · preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age
Xylitol for preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Xylitol vs control
Mortality ‐ not reported · preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age
Xylitol for preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Xylitol vs control
Number of days missed at school or daycare ‐ not measured · preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age
Xylitol for preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Xylitol vs control
Cost ‐ not measured · preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age
Xylitol for preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Xylitol vs control
Final diagnosis of at least one episode of AOM · preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age
Xylitol for preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.9 [0.67, 1.21]1 study · 326 participantsLow
Xylitol vs control
Gastrointestinal‐related adverse events · preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age
Xylitol for preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.04 [0.92, 1.16]1 study · 326 participantsModerate
Xylitol vs control
Antibiotic administration · preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age
Xylitol for preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.9 [0.69, 1.16]1 study · 326 participantsModerate
Xylitol vs control
Hospitalisation ‐ not reported · preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age
Xylitol for preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Xylitol vs control
Mortality ‐ not reported · preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age
Xylitol for preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Xylitol vs control
Gastrointestinal‐related adverse events · preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age
Xylitol for preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.43 [0.74, 2.75]3 studies · 1826 participantsModerate
Xylitol vs control
Number of days missed at school or daycare ‐ not measured · preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age
Xylitol for preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Xylitol vs control
Cost ‐ not measured · preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age
Xylitol for preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Xylitol vs control
Antibiotic administration · preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age
Xylitol for preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.64 [0.42, 0.97]1 study · 306 participantsModerate
Xylitol vs control
Hospitalisation ‐ not reported · preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age
Xylitol for preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Xylitol vs control
Mortality ‐ not reported · preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age
Xylitol for preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Xylitol vs control
Number of days missed at school or daycare ‐ not measured · preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age
Xylitol for preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Xylitol vs control
Cost ‐ not measured · preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age
Xylitol for preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Xylitol vs control
Final diagnosis of at least one episode of AOM · preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age
Xylitol for preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.13 [0.83, 1.53]1 study · 1253 participantsModerate
Xylitol vs control
Gastrointestinal‐related adverse events · preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age
Xylitol for preventing acute otitis media in children up to 12 years of age (2016) · Cochrane
RR 2.82 [0.61, 13]1 study · 1277 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Blindness · children with measles infection and no clinically demonstrable vitamin A deficiency
Routine vitamin A supplementation for the prevention of blindness due to measles infection in children (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 260 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Serum retinol (1 week post‐intervention) (mean X (µg/dL) ± standard error (SE) · children with measles infection and no clinically demonstrable vitamin A deficiency
Routine vitamin A supplementation for the prevention of blindness due to measles infection in children (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 17 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Serum retinol (2 weeks post‐intervention) (mean X (µg/dL) ± standard error SE) · children with measles infection and no clinically demonstrable vitamin A deficiency
Routine vitamin A supplementation for the prevention of blindness due to measles infection in children (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 155 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Serum retinol (6 weeks post‐intervention) (mean X (µg/dL) ± standard error SE) · children with measles infection and no clinically demonstrable vitamin A deficiency
Routine vitamin A supplementation for the prevention of blindness due to measles infection in children (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 39 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Serum retinol (mean change 1 week post‐intervention) (mean X (µg/dL) ± standard error SE) · children with measles infection and no clinically demonstrable vitamin A deficiency
Routine vitamin A supplementation for the prevention of blindness due to measles infection in children (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 17 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Weight gain 6 weeks post‐intervention (mean X (kg) ± standard error SE) · children with measles infection and no clinically demonstrable vitamin A deficiency
Routine vitamin A supplementation for the prevention of blindness due to measles infection in children (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 48 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Weight gain 6 months post‐intervention (mean X (kg) ± standard error SE) · children with measles infection and no clinically demonstrable vitamin A deficiency
Routine vitamin A supplementation for the prevention of blindness due to measles infection in children (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 36 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Otitis media
Antibiotics for preventing suppurative complications from undifferentiated acute respiratory infections in… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.7 [0.45, 1.11]3 studies · 414 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Pneumonia ‐ 12 to 58 months of age · children under 5 years of age with undifferentiated ARI
Antibiotics for preventing suppurative complications from undifferentiated acute respiratory infections in… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.1 [0.71, 1.69]1 study · 563 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Pneumonia ‐ 0 to 11 months of age · children under 5 years of age with undifferentiated ARI
Antibiotics for preventing suppurative complications from undifferentiated acute respiratory infections in… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.96 [0.52, 1.76]1 study · 326 participantsModerate
Summary of findings for single‐dose nasal decongestant vs placebo
Primary outcome: subjective symptom score ‐ 3 hours after dosing · adult patients with the common cold
Nasal decongestants in monotherapy for the common cold (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 540 participantsUngraded
Summary of findings for multi‐dose nasal decongestant vs placebo
Secondary outcome: all adverse eventsTopical · adult patients with the common cold
Nasal decongestants in monotherapy for the common cold (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 61 participantsUngraded
Summary of findings for all doses of nasal decongestant vs placebo
Primary outcome: subjective symptom score (mean) ‐ 3 hours after dosing · adult patients with the common cold
Nasal decongestants in monotherapy for the common cold (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 146 participantsModerate
Summary of findings for all doses of nasal decongestant vs placebo
Primary outcome: subjective symptom score (mean) ‐ 3 hours after dosingOral · adult patients with the common cold
Nasal decongestants in monotherapy for the common cold (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 85 participantsLow
Summary of findings for all doses of nasal decongestant vs placebo
Primary outcome: subjective symptom score (mean) ‐ 3 hours after dosing Topical · adult patients with the common cold
Nasal decongestants in monotherapy for the common cold (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 61 participantsUngraded
Summary of findings for all doses of nasal decongestant vs placebo
Primary outcome: subjective symptom score (AUC) ‐ 3 hours after dosingOral · adult patients with the common cold
Nasal decongestants in monotherapy for the common cold (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 260 participantsLow
Summary of findings for all doses of nasal decongestant vs placebo
Primary outcome: overall patient well‐being · adult patients with the common cold
Nasal decongestants in monotherapy for the common cold (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Summary of findings for all doses of nasal decongestant vs placebo
Secondary outcome: All adverse events · adult patients with the common cold
Nasal decongestants in monotherapy for the common cold (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings for single‐dose nasal decongestant vs placebo
Primary outcome: overall patient well‐being ‐ 3 hours after dosing · adult patients with the common cold
Nasal decongestants in monotherapy for the common cold (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Summary of findings for single‐dose nasal decongestant vs placebo
Secondary outcome: all adverse events · adult patients with the common cold
Nasal decongestants in monotherapy for the common cold (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 82 participantsUngraded
Summary of findings for multi‐dose nasal decongestant vs placebo
Primary outcome: subjective symptom score (mean) ‐ 3 hours after dosing · adult patients with the common cold
Nasal decongestants in monotherapy for the common cold (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 94 participantsLow
Summary of findings for multi‐dose nasal decongestant vs placebo
Primary outcome: subjective symptom score (mean) ‐ 3 hours after dosingOral · adult patients with the common cold
Nasal decongestants in monotherapy for the common cold (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 33 participantsUngraded
Summary of findings for multi‐dose nasal decongestant vs placebo
Primary outcome: subjective symptom score (mean) ‐ 3 hours after dosingTopical · adult patients with the common cold
Nasal decongestants in monotherapy for the common cold (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 61 participantsUngraded
Summary of findings for multi‐dose nasal decongestant vs placebo
Primary outcome: overall patient well‐being · adult patients with the common cold
Nasal decongestants in monotherapy for the common cold (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Summary of findings for multi‐dose nasal decongestant vs placebo
Secondary outcome: all adverse events · adult patients with the common cold
Nasal decongestants in monotherapy for the common cold (2016) · Cochrane
OR 0.98 [0.68, 1.4]7 studies · 1195 participantsLow
Summary of findings for multi‐dose nasal decongestant vs placebo
Secondary outcome: all adverse eventsOral · adult patients with the common cold
Nasal decongestants in monotherapy for the common cold (2016) · Cochrane
OR 0.95 [0.65, 1.39]6 studies · 1134 participantsLow
Semi‐recumbent position (30º to 60º) vs supine position (0° to 10°)
Clinically suspected VAP · adults requiring mechanical ventilation
Semi‐recumbent position versus supine position for the prevention of ventilator‐associated pneumonia in… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.36 [0.25, 0.5]8 studies · 759 participantsModerate
Semi‐recumbent positioning: 45° vs 25° to 30°
ICU mortality · adults requiring mechanical ventilation
Semi‐recumbent position versus supine position for the prevention of ventilator‐associated pneumonia in… (2016) · Cochrane
OR 0.57 [0.15, 2.13]1 study · 30 participantsVery low
Semi‐recumbent positioning: 45° vs 25° to 30°
Hospital mortality · adults requiring mechanical ventilation
Semi‐recumbent position versus supine position for the prevention of ventilator‐associated pneumonia in… (2016) · Cochrane
OR 1 [0.38, 2.65]2 studies · 91 participantsVery low
Semi‐recumbent positioning: 45° vs 25° to 30°
Length of ICU stay · adults requiring mechanical ventilation
Semi‐recumbent position versus supine position for the prevention of ventilator‐associated pneumonia in… (2016) · Cochrane
MD 1.61 study · 61 participantsVery low