Electrosurgery vs Formocresol (FC)
Electrosurgery showed no clear difference in clinical failure compared with formocresol (FC); GRADE not reported.
- RR 3.00 [0.13, 71.22]1 study · 70 participantsGRADE not reported
Electrosurgery showed no clear difference in clinical failure compared with formocresol (FC); GRADE not reported.
Vitapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) led to higher radiological failure compared with ZOE + calcium hydroxide + iodoform (MPRCF, unnamed product); GRADE not reported.
Vitapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) may leads to higher clinical failure compared with zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE) (low certainty).
Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) showed no clear difference in radiological failure compared with calcium hydroxide (CH); GRADE not reported.
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) showed no clear difference in clinical failure compared with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl); GRADE not reported.
Electrosurgery showed no clear difference in radiological failure compared with ferric sulphate (FS) (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether ferric sulphate (FS) changes clinical failure compared with ankaferd Blood Stopper (ABS) (very low certainty).
Vitapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) showed no clear difference in clinical failure compared with calcium hydroxide (CH); GRADE not reported.
It is very uncertain whether self-etch adhesive + acetone-based total-etch adhesive changes radiological failure compared with acetone-based total-etch adhesive (very low certainty).
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) led to lower radiological failure compared with zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE); GRADE not reported.
Metapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) showed no clear difference in clinical failure compared with zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE) (moderate certainty).
Diode laser showed no clear difference in radiological failure compared with formocresol (FC); GRADE not reported.
Erbium:YAG laser showed no clear difference in clinical failure compared with calcium hydroxide (CH); GRADE not reported.
Propolis showed no clear difference in clinical failure compared with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA); GRADE not reported.
Calcium hydroxide (CH) showed no clear difference in clinical failure compared with zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE); GRADE not reported.
Electrofulguration + calcium hydroxide (CH) showed no clear difference in clinical failure compared with electrofulguration + zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE); GRADE not reported.
Erbium:YAG laser led to lower radiological failure compared with calcium hydroxide (CH); GRADE not reported.