Question · asked by 1 review

Vitapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) vs Zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE): Clinical failure

Population
Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth
Intervention
Vitapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform)
Comparison
Zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE)
Outcome
Clinical failure

Vitapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) may leads to higher clinical failure compared with zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE) (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Vitapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) vs Zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE)
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Vitapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) may leads to higher clinical failure compared with zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE) (low certainty).
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane All outcomes
RR 4.75 [1.21, 18.55]4 studies · 161 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth
2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
2017-08Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.