Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

378 questions · 394 findings · 42 reviews · Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning Problems

No studies found 94 · 23.9%GRADE not reported 16 · 4.1%Very low 131 · 33.2%Low 81 · 20.6%Moderate 63 · 16%High 9 · 2.3%

Rinse‐free hand wash vs control

Absenteeism due to any illness (within the study period) Calculated as: an incident rate per child‐days possible Length of time observed: range = 1 to 11 months · children aged from birth to 14 years old

It is very uncertain whether rinse‐free hand wash changes absenteeism due to any illness (within the study period) Calculated… compared with control (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Rinse‐free hand wash vs control

Adverse skin reactions (within the study period) Calculated as: number of events Length of time observed: range = 5 to 8 months · children aged from birth to 14 years old

It is very uncertain whether rinse‐free hand wash changes adverse skin reactions (within the study period) Calculated as:… compared with control (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Rinse‐free hand wash vs control

Absenteeism due to acute respiratory illness (within the study period) Calculated as: an incident rate per child‐days possible Length of time observed: range = 1 to 8 months · children aged from birth to 14 years old

It is very uncertain whether rinse‐free hand wash changes absenteeism due to acute respiratory illness (within the study… compared with control (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Rinse‐free hand wash vs control

Absenteeism due to acute gastrointestinal illness (within the study period) Calculated as: an incident rate per child‐days possible Length of time observed: range = 1 to 8 months · children aged from birth to 14 years old

Rinse‐free hand wash may leads to lower absenteeism due to acute gastrointestinal illness (within the study… compared with control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mechanically assisted walking training without body weight support vs the same dose of overground walking training

Quality of life (not measured) · children with cerebral palsy classified within GMFCS Levels I to III and between 3 and 12 years of age

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Mechanically assisted walking training with body weight support vs no walking training

Quality of life Measured by: PedsQOL‐CP score (range from 0 to 100; higher scores = better quality of life) Timing of outcome assessment: change scores from baseline to 12 weeks · children with cerebral palsy classified within GMFCS Levels I to V and between 3 and 18 years of age
1 finding from 1 review

Mechanically assisted walking training with body weight support vs the same dose of overground walking training

Adverse events (not measured) · children with cerebral palsy classified within GMFCS Levels I to IV and between 4 and 18 years of age

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review