Question · asked by 1 review
Mechanically assisted walking training with body weight support vs the same dose of overground walking training: Activity Gross motor function
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Mechanically assisted walking training with body weight support vs the same dose of overground walking training Gross motor function Measured by: GMFM‐E (higher score = greater performance), reported as % Timing of outcome assessment: postintervention scores at 8 to 10 weeks · children with cerebral palsy classified within GMFCS Levels I to IV and between 4 and 18 years of age Mechanically assisted walking training for walking, participation, and quality of life in children with… (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 52 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mechanically assisted walking training for walking, participation, and quality of life in children with cerebral palsy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.