Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,678 questions · 4,859 findings · 283 reviews

No studies found 1,225 · 25.2%GRADE not reported 215 · 4.4%Very low 1,241 · 25.5%Low 1,210 · 24.9%Moderate 776 · 16%High 192 · 4%

Summary of findings for selective ß2‐adrenergic agonist vs no tocolytic agent, whilst awaiting emergency delivery

Abnormal FHR as defined by trial authors (FHR tracing not improved) · women with fetal distress for whom the decision had been made to delivery by emergency caesarean section

Summary of findings for selective ß2‐adrenergic agonist probably leads to lower abnormal FHR as defined by trial authors (FHR tracing not improved) compared with no tocolytic agent, whilst awaiting emergency delivery (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings for all doses of nasal decongestant vs placebo

Primary outcome: subjective symptom score (mean) ‐ 3 hours after dosing · adult patients with the common cold
3 findings from 1 review

Summary of findings 3. AWARENESS OF INTERCESSORY PRAYER vs INTERCESSORY PRAYER

Clinical state: 1. Improved/not improved: intermediate or bad outcome · patients with scheduled to receive non‐emergency CABG

Summary of findings 4. AWARENESS OF INTERCESSORY PRAYER showed no clear difference in clinical state: 1. Improved/not improved: intermediate or bad outcome compared with INTERCESSORY PRAYER (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings 3. AWARENESS OF INTERCESSORY PRAYER vs INTERCESSORY PRAYER

Clinical state: 2. Significant complications (readmission to CCU) · patients with scheduled to receive non‐emergency CABG

Summary of findings 4. AWARENESS OF INTERCESSORY PRAYER showed no clear difference in clinical state: 2. Significant complications (readmission to CCU) compared with INTERCESSORY PRAYER (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings 3. AWARENESS OF INTERCESSORY PRAYER vs usual care

Clinical state: 1. Improved/not improved: intermediate or bad outcome · patients with scheduled to receive non‐emergency CABG

Summary of findings 3. AWARENESS OF INTERCESSORY PRAYER showed no clear difference in clinical state: 1. Improved/not improved: intermediate or bad outcome compared with STANDARD CARE (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings 3. AWARENESS OF INTERCESSORY PRAYER vs usual care

Clinical state: 2. Significant complications (readmission to CCU) · patients with scheduled to receive non‐emergency CABG

Summary of findings 3. AWARENESS OF INTERCESSORY PRAYER showed no clear difference in clinical state: 2. Significant complications (readmission to CCU) compared with STANDARD CARE (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Positive behavioural support vs treatment

Mental state: Common Mental Disorder (CMD) – at 6 months (Analysis 2.2.1) (CMD) · outwardly aggressive behaviour in people with intellectual disability

Summary of findings table ‐ Positive behavioural support showed no clear difference in mental state: Common Mental Disorder (CMD) – at 6 months (Analysis… compared with treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review