Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4,587 questions · 5,761 findings · 495 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1,011 · 17.5%GRADE not reported 1,797 · 31.2%Very low 1,100 · 19.1%Low 1,052 · 18.3%Moderate 649 · 11.3%High 152 · 2.6%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Topical metronidazole vs oral (oxy)tetracycline

Participant‐assessed improvement in rosacea severity · Participants with rosacea

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 182 participants
Moderate

Topical metronidazole vs oral (oxy)tetracycline

Proportion of participants with adverse event · Participants with rosacea

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 258 participants
Moderate

Topical metronidazole vs oral (oxy)tetracycline

Physician‐assessed improvement in rosacea severity · Participants with rosacea

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 81 participants
Moderate

Topical metronidazole vs oral (oxy)tetracycline

Assessment of erythema or telangiectasia · Participants with rosacea

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 258 participants
Low

Topical metronidazole vs oral (oxy)tetracycline

Lesion count · Participants with rosacea

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 258 participants
Moderate

Topical metronidazole vs oral (oxy)tetracycline

Time needed until improvement ‐ not measured · Participants with rosacea

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Topical metronidazole vs oral (oxy)tetracycline

Duration of remission ‐ not measured · Participants with rosacea

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Manipulation (cervical) vs oral medicine

Pain · patients with acute and subacute neck pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Manipulation (cervical) vs oral medicine

Acute and subacute neck pain Intermediate‐term · patients with acute and subacute neck pain

Manipulation (cervical) showed no clear difference in acute and subacute neck pain Intermediate‐term compared with oral medicine (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 182 participants
Moderate

Manipulation (cervical) vs oral medicine

Acute and subacute neck pain Long‐term · patients with acute and subacute neck pain

Manipulation (cervical) showed no clear difference in acute and subacute neck pain Long‐term compared with oral medicine (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 181 participants
Moderate

Manipulation (cervical) vs oral medicine

Function · patients with acute and subacute neck pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Manipulation (cervical) vs oral medicine

Participant satisfaction · patients with acute and subacute neck pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Manipulation (cervical) vs oral medicine

Quality of life · patients with acute and subacute neck pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intervention not reported

Although a higher percentage of people in the ATL and aCCT groups fell within Class I (seizure free) and Class II (> 50% reduction in seizures), no significant differences in seizure frequency were noted between the groups at 2 years after surgery... · people with temporal lobe epilepsy and intellectual disabilities

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for people with epilepsy and intellectual disabilities 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 60 participants
Very low

Intravenous iron vs oral iron

Maternal mortality Clinical assessment · women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia

Intravenous iron showed no clear difference in maternal mortality Clinical assessment compared with oral iron (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Treatment for women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.95 [0.12, 71.96]
2 studies · 374 participants
Low

Intravenous iron vs oral iron

Fatigue · women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia

1 finding from 1 review

Treatment for women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 361 participants
Very low

Intravenous iron vs oral iron

Persistent anaemia symptoms ‐ not reported · women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Treatment for women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intravenous iron vs oral iron

Infections Clinical assessment · women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia

It is very uncertain whether intravenous iron changes infections Clinical assessment compared with oral iron (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Treatment for women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.7 [0.58, 5.03]
3 studies · 718 participants
Very low

Intravenous iron vs oral iron

Constipation · women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia

It is very uncertain whether intravenous iron changes constipation Reported by the women compared with oral iron (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Treatment for women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.21 [0.11, 0.39]
6 studies · 1217 participants
Very low

Intravenous iron vs oral iron

All gastrointestinal symptoms Reported by the women · women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia

It is very uncertain whether intravenous iron changes all gastrointestinal symptoms Reported by the women compared with oral iron (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Treatment for women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.31 [0.2, 0.47]
8 studies · 1307 participants
Very low