What do systematic reviews say?

Summary of findings: Energy‐restricted diet vs no energy‐restricted diet (maternal outcomes)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Different types of dietary advice for women with gestational diabetes mellitus 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings: Energy‐restricted diet vs no energy‐restricted diet (maternal outcomes)

Summary of findings: Energy‐restricted diet showed no clear difference in large‐for‐gestational age compared with no energy‐restricted diet (neonatal/child/adulthood outcomes) (low certainty).

• Different types of dietary advice for women with gestational diabetes mellitus 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.17 [0.65, 2.12]
  1 study · 123 participants
  Low

Summary of findings: Energy‐restricted diet vs no energy‐restricted diet (maternal outcomes)

• Different types of dietary advice for women with gestational diabetes mellitus 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 423 participants
  Low

Summary of findings: Energy‐restricted diet vs no energy‐restricted diet (maternal outcomes)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Different types of dietary advice for women with gestational diabetes mellitus 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings: Energy‐restricted diet vs no energy‐restricted diet (maternal outcomes)

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Energy‐restricted diet changes neonatal hypoglycaemia compared with no energy‐restricted diet (neonatal/child/adulthood outcomes) (very low certainty).

• Different types of dietary advice for women with gestational diabetes mellitus 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.06 [0.48, 2.32]
  2 studies · 408 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings: Energy‐restricted diet vs no energy‐restricted diet (maternal outcomes)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Different types of dietary advice for women with gestational diabetes mellitus 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings: Energy‐restricted diet vs no energy‐restricted diet (maternal outcomes)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Different types of dietary advice for women with gestational diabetes mellitus 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings: Energy‐restricted diet vs no energy‐restricted diet (maternal outcomes)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Different types of dietary advice for women with gestational diabetes mellitus 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Platelet‐rich growth factor + hyaluronic acid vs platelet‐rich growth factor

It is very uncertain whether platelet‐rich growth factor + hyaluronic acid changes complete ulcer healing compared with platelet‐rich growth factor (very low certainty).

• Dressings and topical agents containing hyaluronic acid for chronic wound healing 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.17 [0.58, 2.35]
  1 study · 65 participants
  Very low

Platelet‐rich growth factor + hyaluronic acid vs platelet‐rich growth factor

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Dressings and topical agents containing hyaluronic acid for chronic wound healing 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Platelet‐rich growth factor + hyaluronic acid vs platelet‐rich growth factor

• Dressings and topical agents containing hyaluronic acid for chronic wound healing 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 65 participants
  Very low

Platelet‐rich growth factor + hyaluronic acid vs platelet‐rich growth factor

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Dressings and topical agents containing hyaluronic acid for chronic wound healing 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Platelet‐rich growth factor + hyaluronic acid vs platelet‐rich growth factor

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Dressings and topical agents containing hyaluronic acid for chronic wound healing 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Platelet‐rich growth factor + hyaluronic acid vs platelet‐rich growth factor

It is very uncertain whether platelet‐rich growth factor + hyaluronic acid changes change in ulcer size compared with platelet‐rich growth factor (very low certainty).

• Dressings and topical agents containing hyaluronic acid for chronic wound healing 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  MD 25.6
  1 study · 65 participants
  Very low

Fluid restricted vs liberal fluids compared to placebo

• Fluid restriction for treatment of preterm infants with chronic lung disease 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 60 participants
  Low

Fluid restricted vs liberal fluids compared to placebo

• Fluid restriction for treatment of preterm infants with chronic lung disease 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 60 participants
  Low

Fluid restricted vs liberal fluids compared to placebo

• Fluid restriction for treatment of preterm infants with chronic lung disease 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 60 participants
  Low

Fluid restricted vs liberal fluids compared to placebo

Fluid restricted showed no clear difference in proportion with apnoea compared with liberal fluids compared to placebo (low certainty).

• Fluid restriction for treatment of preterm infants with chronic lung disease 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.35 [0.98, 1.86]
  1 study · 60 participants
  Low

Ferric sulphate (FS) + mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Ferric sulphate (FS)

• Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes

  mean 22 months
  Assessed pain, soft tissue, mobility, adjacent tissue inflammation, radiolucency, root resorption, pulp canal obliteration (Doyle 2010); no clinical/radiological failure outcome; no significant differences
  1 study · 135 participants
  GRADE not reported

Glass ionomer sealant (with fluoride gel plus dentifrice) vs Fluoride gel plus fluoride toothpaste/dentifrice (non-invasive control)

Glass ionomer sealant (with fluoride gel plus dentifrice) showed no clear difference in caries (lesion) progression (radiographic) compared with fluoride gel plus fluoride toothpaste/dentifrice (non-invasive…; GRADE not reported.

• Micro‐invasive interventions for managing proximal dental decay in primary and permanent teeth 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes

  12 to 36 months (radiographic follow-up) · Glass ionomer sealant
  OR 0.13 [0.01, 2.52]
  1 study
  GRADE not reported