Reactive air surfaces vs foam surfaces
All reported adverse events · people with pressure ulcers
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted2 studies · 156 participantsLow
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
2,209 questions · 2,322 findings · 227 reviews · Headline outcomes only
No studies found 644 · 27.7%GRADE not reported 135 · 5.8%Very low 591 · 25.5%Low 582 · 25.1%Moderate 309 · 13.3%High 61 · 2.6%
Reactive air surfaces vs foam surfaces
Health‐related quality of life · people with pressure ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Reactive air surfaces vs foam surfaces
Cost‐effectiveness · people with pressure ulcers
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 87 participantsLow
Reactive air surfaces vs foam surfaces
Ulcer healing · people with pressure ulcers
Reactive air surfaces showed no clear difference in proportion of participants with pressure ulcers completely healed compared with foam surfaces (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 1.32 [0.96, 1.8]2 studies · 156 participantsLow
Reactive air surfaces vs foam surfaces
Time to complete healing of pressure ulcers ‐ not reported · people with pressure ulcers
Reactive air surfaces may leads to higher time to complete pressure ulcer healing compared with foam surfaces (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- HR 2.66 [1.34, 5.17]1 study · 84 participantsLow
Reactive air surfaces vs foam surfaces
Support surface associated patient comfort · people with pressure ulcers
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 72 participantsVery low
Active exercise regimen vs an immobilisation regimen following surgery
Range of movement · participants undergoing rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the handa
It is very uncertain whether active exercise regimen changes range of movement compared with an immobilisation regimen following surgery (very low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
- Rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the hand 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 0.08 [0, 1.43]1 study · 84 participantsVery low
- Rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the hand 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Active exercise regimen vs an immobilisation regimen following surgery
Adverse events: participants incurring one or more adverse events · participants undergoing rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the handa
1 finding from 1 review
- Rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the hand 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 84 participantsGRADE not reported
Active exercise regimen vs an immobilisation regimen following surgery
Adverse events requiring (or indicated for) surgery · participants undergoing rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the handa
It is very uncertain whether active exercise regimen changes adverse events requiring (or indicated for) surgery compared with an immobilisation regimen following surgery (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the hand 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 0.64 [0.24, 1.7]1 study · 84 participantsVery low
Active exercise regimen vs an immobilisation regimen following surgery
Functional assessment using a patient reported outcome measure: · participants undergoing rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the handa
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
2 findings from 1 review
- Rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the hand 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
- Rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the hand 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Reactive water surfaces vs foam surfaces
Ulcer healing · people with pressure ulcers
It is very uncertain whether reactive water surfaces changes proportion of participants with pressure ulcers completely healed compared with foam surfaces (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 1.07 [0.7, 1.63]1 study · 101 participantsVery low
Reactive water surfaces vs foam surfaces
Time to complete healing of pressure ulcers ‐ not reported · people with pressure ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Reactive water surfaces vs foam surfaces
Support surface associated patient comfort · people with pressure ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Reactive water surfaces vs foam surfaces
All reported adverse events · people with pressure ulcers
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 120 participantsVery low
Reactive water surfaces vs foam surfaces
Health‐related quality of life · people with pressure ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Reactive water surfaces vs foam surfaces
Cost‐effectiveness · people with pressure ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Discontinued intravenous (IV) oxytocin stimulation vs continued IV oxytocin stimulation
Caesarean delivery after active phase has begun, using "reached active phase" as the denominator · pregnant women in latent phase of labour stimulated with oxytocin for with induction of labour. No exclusion criteria were applied in…
Discontinued intravenous (IV) oxytocin stimulation showed no clear difference in caesarean delivery after active phase has begun, using "reached… compared with continued IV oxytocin stimulation (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Discontinuation of intravenous oxytocin in the active phase of induced labour 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 0.92 [0.65, 1.29]4 studies · 787 participantsModerate
Rifampicin vs isoniazid
Active TB · HIV‐negative people at risk of TB infection1
It is very uncertain whether rifampicin changes active TB compared with isoniazid (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Rifamycins (rifampicin, rifabutin and rifapentine) compared to isoniazid for preventing tuberculosis in HIV‐negative… 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 0.81 [0.47, 1.4]1 study · 332 participantsVery low
Rifapentine plus isoniazid weekly vs isoniazid
Active TB · HIV‐negative people at risk of TB infection1
Rifapentine plus isoniazid weekly showed no clear difference in active TB compared with isoniazid daily (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Rifamycins (rifampicin, rifabutin and rifapentine) compared to isoniazid for preventing tuberculosis in HIV‐negative… 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 0.44 [0.18, 1.07]1 study · 7731 participantsModerate
Rifampicin plus isoniazid vs isoniazid
Active TB · HIV‐negative people at risk of TB infection1
It is very uncertain whether rifampicin plus isoniazid changes active TB compared with isoniazid (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Rifamycins (rifampicin, rifabutin and rifapentine) compared to isoniazid for preventing tuberculosis in HIV‐negative… 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 1.08 [0.65, 1.79]1 study · 328 participantsVery low