Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2,359 questions · 2,491 findings · 249 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 696 · 27.9%GRADE not reported 213 · 8.6%Very low 611 · 24.5%Low 595 · 23.9%Moderate 315 · 12.6%High 61 · 2.4%

Active music therapy vs receptive music therapy

Functioning ‐ not reported · depression in adults

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Music therapy for depression 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Active music therapy vs receptive music therapy

Quality of life (SF‐36 Thai) Up to 3 months · depression in adults

1 finding from 1 review

Music therapy for depression 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 9 participants
Very low

Active music therapy vs receptive music therapy

Behaviour: Leaving the study early (short‐term) · depression in adults

It is very uncertain whether active music therapy changes leaving the study early Up to 3 months compared with receptive music therapy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Music therapy for depression 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.27 [0.01, 8.46]
1 study · 10 participants
Very low

Active music therapy vs receptive music therapy

Anxiety ‐ not reported · depression in adults

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Music therapy for depression 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Reactive air surfaces vs foam surfaces

All reported adverse events · people with pressure ulcers

1 finding from 1 review

Beds, overlays and mattresses for treating pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 156 participants
Low

Reactive air surfaces vs foam surfaces

Health‐related quality of life · people with pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Beds, overlays and mattresses for treating pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Reactive air surfaces vs foam surfaces

Cost‐effectiveness · people with pressure ulcers

1 finding from 1 review

Beds, overlays and mattresses for treating pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 87 participants
Low

Reactive air surfaces vs foam surfaces

Ulcer healing · people with pressure ulcers

Reactive air surfaces showed no clear difference in proportion of participants with pressure ulcers completely healed compared with foam surfaces (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Beds, overlays and mattresses for treating pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.32 [0.96, 1.8]
2 studies · 156 participants
Low

Reactive air surfaces vs foam surfaces

Time to complete healing of pressure ulcers ‐ not reported · people with pressure ulcers

Reactive air surfaces may leads to higher time to complete pressure ulcer healing compared with foam surfaces (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Beds, overlays and mattresses for treating pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
HR 2.66 [1.34, 5.17]
1 study · 84 participants
Low

Reactive air surfaces vs foam surfaces

Support surface associated patient comfort · people with pressure ulcers

1 finding from 1 review

Beds, overlays and mattresses for treating pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 72 participants
Very low

Active exercise regimen vs an immobilisation regimen following surgery

Range of movement · participants undergoing rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the handa

It is very uncertain whether active exercise regimen changes range of movement compared with an immobilisation regimen following surgery (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the hand 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.08 [0, 1.43]
1 study · 84 participants
Very low
Rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the hand 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Active exercise regimen vs an immobilisation regimen following surgery

Adverse events: participants incurring one or more adverse events · participants undergoing rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the handa

1 finding from 1 review

Rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the hand 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 84 participants
GRADE not reported

Active exercise regimen vs an immobilisation regimen following surgery

Adverse events requiring (or indicated for) surgery · participants undergoing rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the handa

It is very uncertain whether active exercise regimen changes adverse events requiring (or indicated for) surgery compared with an immobilisation regimen following surgery (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the hand 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.64 [0.24, 1.7]
1 study · 84 participants
Very low

Active exercise regimen vs an immobilisation regimen following surgery

Functional assessment using a patient reported outcome measure: · participants undergoing rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the handa

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the hand 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the hand 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Reactive water surfaces vs foam surfaces

Ulcer healing · people with pressure ulcers

It is very uncertain whether reactive water surfaces changes proportion of participants with pressure ulcers completely healed compared with foam surfaces (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Beds, overlays and mattresses for treating pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.07 [0.7, 1.63]
1 study · 101 participants
Very low

Reactive water surfaces vs foam surfaces

Time to complete healing of pressure ulcers ‐ not reported · people with pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Beds, overlays and mattresses for treating pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Reactive water surfaces vs foam surfaces

Support surface associated patient comfort · people with pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Beds, overlays and mattresses for treating pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Reactive water surfaces vs foam surfaces

All reported adverse events · people with pressure ulcers

1 finding from 1 review

Beds, overlays and mattresses for treating pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 120 participants
Very low

Reactive water surfaces vs foam surfaces

Health‐related quality of life · people with pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Beds, overlays and mattresses for treating pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Reactive water surfaces vs foam surfaces

Cost‐effectiveness · people with pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Beds, overlays and mattresses for treating pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found