Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4,749 questions · 17,858 findings · 1,266 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 4,359 · 24.4%GRADE not reported 2,348 · 13.1%Very low 4,634 · 25.9%Low 4,000 · 22.4%Moderate 2,052 · 11.5%High 465 · 2.6%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Summary of findings: Comparison 3 ‐ deferiprone (DFP) vs deferasirox (DFX)

SAE (chelation‐related) (n/N)

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
1.54 [0.44, 5.39]
1 study · 390 participants
Very low

Summary of findings: Comparison 3 ‐ deferiprone (DFP) vs deferasirox (DFX)

SAEs

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Comparison 3 ‐ deferiprone (DFP) changes total SAEs compared with deferasirox (DFX) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.95 [0.46, 1.96]
1 study · 390 participants
Very low

Summary of findings: Comparison 3 ‐ deferiprone (DFP) vs deferasirox (DFX)

All‐cause mortality (n/N)

Summary of findings: Comparison 3 ‐ deferiprone (DFP) showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality (n/N) compared with deferasirox (DFX) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RD 0
1 study · 390 participants
Low

Summary of findings: Comparison 3 ‐ deferiprone (DFP) vs deferasirox (DFX)

Sustained adherence

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings: Comparison 3 ‐ deferiprone (DFP) vs deferasirox (DFX)

QoL

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

DFX film‐coated tablet vs DFX dispersible tablet

Adherence to iron chelation therapy (%, SD)

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 91 participants
Very low

DFX film‐coated tablet vs DFX dispersible tablet

Sustained adherence to iron chelation therapy (%, SD)

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 54 participants
Very low

Summary of findings: Comparison 3 ‐ deferiprone (DFP) vs deferoxamine

SAEs

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Comparison 1 ‐ deferiprone (DFP) changes total reported SAEs (from therapy, disease, non‐adherence) compared with deferoxamine (DFO) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.43 [0.83, 2.46]
1 study · 228 participants
Very low

DFX film‐coated tablet vs DFX dispersible tablet

SAEs

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Comparison 4 ‐ deferasirox (DFX) film‐coated… changes incidence of SAEs compared with DFX dispersible tablets (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.22 [0.62, 2.37]
1 study · 173 participants
Very low

DFX film‐coated tablet vs DFX dispersible tablet

All‐cause mortality

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
7.3 [0.14, 368.15]
1 study · 173 participants
Very low

DFX film‐coated tablet vs DFX dispersible tablet

QoL

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

DFP and DFO vs DFP

Adherence to iron chelation therapy (%, SD)

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 369 participants
Low

DFP and DFO vs DFP

SAEs

Summary of findings: Comparison 5 ‐ deferiprone (DFP) plus… showed no clear difference in incidence of SAEs compared with DFP (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.15 [0.01, 2.81]
1 study · 213 participants
Low

DFP and DFO vs DFP

All‐cause mortality

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
0.77 [0.17, 3.42]
2 studies · 237 participants
Very low

DFP and DFO vs DFP

Sustained adherence

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

DFP and DFO vs DFP

QoL

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

DFP and DFO vs deferoxamine

Adherence to iron chelation therapy (%, SD)

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
5 studies · 281 participants
Low

DFP and DFO vs deferoxamine

SAEs

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 180 participants
Low

Summary of findings: Comparison 3 ‐ deferiprone (DFP) vs deferoxamine

All‐cause mortality

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Comparison 1 ‐ deferiprone (DFP) changes all‐cause mortality compared with deferoxamine (DFO) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.47 [0.18, 1.21]
3 studies · 376 participants
Very low

DFP and DFO vs deferoxamine

All‐cause mortality

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found