Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4,695 questions · 4,979 findings · 433 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 998 · 20%GRADE not reported 1,140 · 22.9%Very low 1,024 · 20.6%Low 1,029 · 20.7%Moderate 636 · 12.8%High 152 · 3.1%

Doxepin cream vs oral antihistamine

Pain · people with postburn pruritus

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for postburn pruritus 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs pectoralis plane block

Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia

1 finding from 1 review

Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 98 participants
Low

Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs pectoralis plane block

Rates of block‐related adverse events · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia

1 finding from 1 review

Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 47 participants
GRADE not reported

Balloon (Foley or ATAD) vs low‐dose oral misoprostol

Vaginal delivery not achieved within 24 hours · third trimester induction of labour in women with a viable fetus

Balloon (Foley or ATAD) probably leads to higher vaginal delivery not achieved within 24 hours compared with low‐dose oral misoprostol (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mechanical methods for induction of labour 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.28 [1.13, 1.46]
2 studies · 782 participants
Moderate

Balloon (Foley or ATAD) vs low‐dose oral misoprostol

Uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes · third trimester induction of labour in women with a viable fetus

Balloon (Foley or ATAD) showed no clear difference in uterine hyperstimulation with FHR changes compared with low‐dose oral misoprostol (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mechanical methods for induction of labour 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.81 [0.48, 1.38]
2 studies · 2033 participants
Low

Balloon (Foley or ATAD) vs low‐dose oral misoprostol

Caesarean section · third trimester induction of labour in women with a viable fetus

Balloon (Foley or ATAD) probably leads to higher caesarean section compared with low‐dose oral misoprostol (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mechanical methods for induction of labour 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.17 [1.04, 1.32]
7 studies · 3178 participants
Moderate

Balloon (Foley or ATAD) vs low‐dose oral misoprostol

Serious neonatal morbidity or perinatal death · third trimester induction of labour in women with a viable fetus

Balloon (Foley or ATAD) showed no clear difference in serious neonatal morbidity or perinatal death compared with low‐dose oral misoprostol (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mechanical methods for induction of labour 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.11 [0.6, 2.06]
3 studies · 2627 participants
Low

Balloon (Foley or ATAD) vs low‐dose oral misoprostol

Serious maternal morbidity or death · third trimester induction of labour in women with a viable fetus

It is very uncertain whether balloon (Foley or ATAD) changes serious maternal morbidity or death compared with low‐dose oral misoprostol (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mechanical methods for induction of labour 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.5 [0.05, 5.52]
3 studies · 2627 participants
Very low

Balloon (Foley or ATAD) vs low‐dose oral misoprostol

Apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes · third trimester induction of labour in women with a viable fetus

Balloon (Foley or ATAD) showed no clear difference in apgar score < 7 after 5 minutes compared with low‐dose oral misoprostol (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mechanical methods for induction of labour 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.71 [0.38, 1.32]
4 studies · 2693 participants
Low

Balloon (Foley or ATAD) vs low‐dose oral misoprostol

Admission to neonatal intensive care unit · third trimester induction of labour in women with a viable fetus

Balloon (Foley or ATAD) showed no clear difference in neonatal intensive care unit admission compared with low‐dose oral misoprostol (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mechanical methods for induction of labour 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.82 [0.58, 1.17]
5 studies · 2873 participants
Low

Clobetasol propionate cream vs prednisone

Disease control (healing of skin lesions) at day 21 · bullous pemphigoid

Clobetasol propionate cream probably leads to higher disease control (healing of skin lesions) at day 21 compared with oral prednisone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for bullous pemphigoid 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.08 [1.03, 1.13]
1 study · 341 participants
Moderate

Clobetasol propionate cream vs prednisone

Mortality at 1 year · bullous pemphigoid

Clobetasol propionate cream showed no clear difference in mortality at 1 year compared with oral prednisone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for bullous pemphigoid 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.73 [0.53, 1.01]
1 study · 341 participants
Low

Clobetasol propionate cream vs prednisone

Quality of life ‐ not measured · bullous pemphigoid

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for bullous pemphigoid 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Clobetasol propionate cream vs prednisone

Adverse events: severe complications at day 21 · bullous pemphigoid

Clobetasol propionate cream may leads to lower adverse events: severe complications at day 21 compared with oral prednisone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for bullous pemphigoid 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.65 [0.5, 0.86]
1 study · 341 participants
Low

Six‐food elimination diet vs swallowed fluticasone compared to swallowed budesonide compared to oral viscous budesonide

Clinical improvement (dichotomous) · active EoE pediatric patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Six‐food elimination diet vs swallowed fluticasone compared to swallowed budesonide compared to oral viscous budesonide

Clinical improvement (continuous) · active EoE pediatric patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Six‐food elimination diet vs swallowed fluticasone compared to swallowed budesonide compared to oral viscous budesonide

Histological improvement (dichotomous) · active EoE pediatric patients

1 finding from 1 review

Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 64 participants
Very low

Six‐food elimination diet vs swallowed fluticasone compared to swallowed budesonide compared to oral viscous budesonide

Histological improvement (continuous) · active EoE pediatric patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Six‐food elimination diet vs swallowed fluticasone compared to swallowed budesonide compared to oral viscous budesonide

Endoscopic improvement (dichotomous) · active EoE pediatric patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Six‐food elimination diet vs swallowed fluticasone compared to swallowed budesonide compared to oral viscous budesonide

Endoscopic improvement (continuous) · active EoE pediatric patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found