Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,645 questions in 107 reviews · Wounds

current versions
No studies 651 · 39.6%Ungraded 84 · 5.1%Very low 554 · 33.7%Low 283 · 17.2%Moderate 64 · 3.9%High 9 · 0.5%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive air surfaces
Support surface‐associated patient comfort · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 1364 participantsVery low
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive air surfaces
All reported adverse events · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive air surfaces
Health‐related quality of life · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive air surfaces
Cost effectiveness · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive water‐filled surfaces
Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
RR 1.21 [0.52, 2.83]2 studies · 358 participantsVery low
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive water‐filled surfaces
Time to pressure ulcer development · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive water‐filled surfaces
Support surface‐associated patient comfort · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive water‐filled surfaces
All reported adverse events · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive water‐filled surfaces
Health‐related quality of life · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive water‐filled surfaces
Cost effectiveness · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs foam surfaces
Time to pressure ulcer development · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
HR 0.41 [0.1, 1.64]2 studies · 2105 participantsVery low
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive fibre surfaces
Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
RR 0.9 [0.68, 1.19]3 studies · 285 participantsVery low
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive fibre surfaces
Time to pressure ulcer development · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive fibre surfaces
Support surface‐associated patient comfort · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 187 participantsVery low
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive fibre surfaces
All reported adverse events · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive fibre surfaces
Health‐related quality of life · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive fibre surfaces
Cost effectiveness · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces on operating tables and subsequently on ward beds vs reactive gel surfaces on operating tables followed by foam surfaces on ward beds
Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
RR 0.22 [0.06, 0.76]2 studies · 415 participantsLow
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces on operating tables and subsequently on ward beds vs reactive gel surfaces on operating tables followed by foam surfaces on ward beds
Time to pressure ulcer development · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces on operating tables and subsequently on ward beds vs reactive gel surfaces on operating tables followed by foam surfaces on ward beds
Support surface‐associated patient comfort · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces on operating tables and subsequently on ward beds vs reactive gel surfaces on operating tables followed by foam surfaces on ward beds
All reported adverse events · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 198 participantsVery low
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs foam surfaces
Support surface‐associated patient comfort · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 76 participantsVery low
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces on operating tables and subsequently on ward beds vs reactive gel surfaces on operating tables followed by foam surfaces on ward beds
Health‐related quality of life · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces on operating tables and subsequently on ward beds vs reactive gel surfaces on operating tables followed by foam surfaces on ward beds
Cost effectiveness · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs foam surfaces
All reported adverse events · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 2181 participantsVery low
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs foam surfaces
Health‐related quality of life (90‐day EQ‐5D‐5L, expressed as utility values ranging from −1 to 1 with 1 representing perfect health, 0 representing death, and −1 representing worse than death) · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 267 participantsLow
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs foam surfaces
Health‐related quality of life (90‐day PU‐QoL‐UI, expressed as utility values ranging from −1 to 1 with 1 representing perfect health, 0 representing death, and −1 representing worse than death) · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 233 participantsLow
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs foam surfaces
Cost‐effectiveness · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 1 participantsModerate
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive air surfaces
Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
RR 1.61 [0.9, 2.88]6 studies · 1648 participantsVery low
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs reactive air surfaces
Time to pressure ulcer development · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
HR 2.25 [1.05, 4.83]1 study · 308 participantsLow
Foam surfaces vs alternating pressure (active) air surfaces
Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · pressure ulcer prevention
Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
RR 1.59 [0.86, 2.95]4 studies · 2247 participantsLow
Foam surfaces vs reactive air surfaces
Support surface associated patient comfort · pressure ulcer prevention
Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 72 participantsVery low
Foam surfaces vs reactive air surfaces
All reported adverse events · pressure ulcer prevention
Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 72 participantsVery low
Foam surfaces vs reactive air surfaces
Health‐related quality of life · pressure ulcer prevention
Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Foam surfaces vs reactive air surfaces
Cost‐effectiveness · pressure ulcer prevention
Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Foam surfaces vs reactive fibre surfaces
Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · pressure ulcer prevention
Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
RR 1.17 [0.64, 2.14]1 study · 68 participantsVery low
Foam surfaces vs reactive fibre surfaces
Time to pressure ulcer development · pressure ulcer prevention
Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Foam surfaces vs reactive fibre surfaces
Support surface associated patient comfort · pressure ulcer prevention
Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Foam surfaces vs reactive fibre surfaces
All reported adverse events · pressure ulcer prevention
Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Foam surfaces vs reactive fibre surfaces
Health‐related quality of life · pressure ulcer prevention
Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Foam surfaces vs reactive fibre surfaces
Cost‐effectiveness · pressure ulcer prevention
Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Foam surfaces vs alternating pressure (active) air surfaces
Time to pressure ulcer development · pressure ulcer prevention
Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 2105 participantsVery low
Foam surfaces vs reactive gel surfaces
Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · pressure ulcer prevention
Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 270 participantsVery low
Foam surfaces vs reactive gel surfaces
Time to pressure ulcer development · pressure ulcer prevention
Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Foam surfaces vs reactive gel surfaces
Support surface associated patient comfort · pressure ulcer prevention
Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Foam surfaces vs reactive gel surfaces
All reported adverse events · pressure ulcer prevention
Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Foam surfaces vs reactive gel surfaces
Health‐related quality of life · pressure ulcer prevention
Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Foam surfaces vs reactive gel surfaces
Cost‐effectiveness · pressure ulcer prevention
Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Foam surfaces vs reactive foam and gel surfaces
Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · pressure ulcer prevention
Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 182 participantsVery low
Foam surfaces vs reactive foam and gel surfaces
Time to pressure ulcer development · pressure ulcer prevention
Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies