Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

970 questions in 77 reviews · Epilepsy

current versions
No studies 190 · 19.6%Ungraded 42 · 4.3%Very low 135 · 13.9%Low 289 · 29.8%Moderate 242 · 24.9%High 72 · 7.4%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Intervention NR
Proportion free from all seizures (including auras) at 1 year · adults and children with drug‐resistant epilepsy suitable for surgical intervention
Surgery for epilepsy (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.82 [1.12, 2.93]1 study · 70 participantsLow
Topiramate vs carbamazepine
Time to treatment failure (any reason related to treatment) All participants ‐ adjusted by seizure type Range of · adults and children with newly onset focal or generalised epilepsy
Topiramate versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2019) · Cochrane
HR 1.16 [0.97, 1.38]2 studies · 1129 participantsModerate
Topiramate vs carbamazepine
Time to treatment failure (any reason related to treatment)Subgroup: focal onset seizures Range of · adults and children with newly onset focal or generalised epilepsy
Topiramate versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2019) · Cochrane
HR 1.21 [1.01, 1.46]2 studies · 937 participantsModerate
Topiramate vs carbamazepine
Time to treatment failure (any reason related to treatment) Subgroup: generalised onset tonic‐clonic seizures or unclassified epilepsy Range of · adults and children with newly onset focal or generalised epilepsy
Topiramate versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2019) · Cochrane
HR 0.88 [0.56, 1.39]2 studies · 192 participantsLow
Topiramate vs carbamazepine
Time to first seizure after randomisation All participants Range of · adults and children with newly onset focal or generalised epilepsy
Topiramate versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2019) · Cochrane
HR 1.11 [0.96, 1.29]2 studies · 1115 participantsHigh
Topiramate vs carbamazepine
Time to first seizure after randomisation Subgroup: focal onset seizures Range of · adults and children with newly onset focal or generalised epilepsy
Topiramate versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2019) · Cochrane
HR 1.12 [0.95, 1.31]2 studies · 925 participantsHigh
Topiramate vs carbamazepine
Time to first seizure after randomisation Subgroup: generalised onset tonic‐clonic seizures or unclassified epilepsy Range of · adults and children with newly onset focal or generalised epilepsy
Topiramate versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2019) · Cochrane
HR 1.08 [0.7, 1.66]2 studies · 190 participantsModerate
Topiramate vs carbamazepine
Time to 12‐month remission of seizures All participants Range of · adults and children with newly onset focal or generalised epilepsy
Topiramate versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2019) · Cochrane
HR 0.84 [0.71, 0.99]2 studies · 1115 participantsHigh
Topiramate vs carbamazepine
Time to 12‐month remission of seizures Subgroup: focal onset seizures Range of · adults and children with newly onset focal or generalised epilepsy
Topiramate versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2019) · Cochrane
HR 0.82 [0.69, 0.99]2 studies · 925 participantsHigh
Topiramate vs carbamazepine
Time to 12‐month remission of seizures Subgroup: generalised onset tonic‐clonic seizures or unclassified epilepsy Range of · adults and children with newly onset focal or generalised epilepsy
Topiramate versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2019) · Cochrane
HR 0.92 [0.61, 1.41]2 studies · 190 participantsModerate
Summary of findings: lamotrigine vs carbamazepine
Time to treatment failure (any reason related to treatment) All participants Range of · adults and children with focal onset or generalised onset seizures (generalised tonic‐clonic with or without other…
Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2018) · Cochrane
HR 0.71 [0.62, 0.82]9 studies · 2481 participantsModerate
Summary of findings: lamotrigine vs carbamazepine
Time to treatment failure (any reason related to treatment) Subgroup: focal onset seizures Range of · adults and children with focal onset or generalised onset seizures (generalised tonic‐clonic with or without other…
Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2018) · Cochrane
HR 0.74 [0.64, 0.86]9 studies · 2182 participantsModerate
Summary of findings: lamotrigine vs carbamazepine
Time to treatment failure (any reason related to treatment) Subgroup: generalised onset seizures Range of · adults and children with focal onset or generalised onset seizures (generalised tonic‐clonic with or without other…
Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2018) · Cochrane
HR 0.51 [0.33, 0.78]6 studies · 299 participantsLow
Summary of findings: lamotrigine vs carbamazepine
Time to first seizure All participants Range of · adults and children with focal onset or generalised onset seizures (generalised tonic‐clonic with or without other…
Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2018) · Cochrane
HR 1.26 [1.12, 1.41]9 studies · 2476 participantsHigh
Summary of findings: lamotrigine vs carbamazepine
Time to first seizure Subgroup: focal onset seizures Range of · adults and children with focal onset or generalised onset seizures (generalised tonic‐clonic with or without other…
Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2018) · Cochrane
HR 1.29 [1.14, 1.45]9 studies · 2177 participantsHigh
Summary of findings: lamotrigine vs carbamazepine
Time to first seizure Subgroup: generalised onset seizures Range of · adults and children with focal onset or generalised onset seizures (generalised tonic‐clonic with or without other…
Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2018) · Cochrane
HR 0.98 [0.65, 1.48]6 studies · 277 participantsLow
Summary of findings: lamotrigine vs carbamazepine
Time to 12‐month remission All participants Range of · adults and children with focal onset or generalised onset seizures (generalised tonic‐clonic with or without other…
Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2018) · Cochrane
HR 0.91 [0.77, 1.07]2 studies · 988 participantsHigh
Sodium valproate vs phenytoin monotherapy
Time to treatment failure (any reason related to treatment) All participants Range of · adults and children with newly‐onset focal onset or generalised tonic‐clonic seizures
Sodium valproate versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2018) · Cochrane
HR 0.88 [0.61, 1.27]5 studies · 528 participantsModerate
Sodium valproate vs phenytoin monotherapy
Time to treatment failure (any reason related to treatment) Subgroup: focal onset seizures Range of · adults and children with newly‐onset focal onset or generalised tonic‐clonic seizures
Sodium valproate versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2018) · Cochrane
HR 0.83 [0.5, 1.38]4 studies · 187 participantsModerate
Sodium valproate vs phenytoin monotherapy
Time to treatment failure (any reason related to treatment) Subgroup: generalised onset seizures (tonic‐clonic only) Range of · adults and children with newly‐onset focal onset or generalised tonic‐clonic seizures
Sodium valproate versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2018) · Cochrane
HR 0.94 [0.55, 1.61]5 studies · 341 participantsLow
Sodium valproate vs phenytoin monotherapy
Time to first seizure (post‐randomisation) All participants Range of · adults and children with newly‐onset focal onset or generalised tonic‐clonic seizures
Sodium valproate versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2018) · Cochrane
HR 1.08 [0.88, 1.33]5 studies · 639 participantsLow
Sodium valproate vs phenytoin monotherapy
Time to first seizure (post‐randomisation) Subgroup: focal onset seizures Range of · adults and children with newly‐onset focal onset or generalised tonic‐clonic seizures
Sodium valproate versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2018) · Cochrane
HR 1.2 [0.9, 1.6]4 studies · 244 participantsLow
Sodium valproate vs phenytoin monotherapy
Time to first seizure (post‐randomisation) Subgroup: generalised onset seizures (tonic‐clonic only) Range of · adults and children with newly‐onset focal onset or generalised tonic‐clonic seizures
Sodium valproate versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2018) · Cochrane
HR 0.97 [0.72, 1.3]5 studies · 395 participantsLow
Sodium valproate vs phenytoin monotherapy
Time to achieve 12‐month remission (seizure‐free period) All participants Range of · adults and children with newly‐onset focal onset or generalised tonic‐clonic seizures
Sodium valproate versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2018) · Cochrane
HR 1.02 [0.81, 1.28]4 studies · 514 participantsModerate
Sodium valproate vs phenytoin monotherapy
Time to achieve 12‐month remission (seizure‐free period) Subgroup: focal onset seizures Range of · adults and children with newly‐onset focal onset or generalised tonic‐clonic seizures
Sodium valproate versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2018) · Cochrane
HR 1.11 [0.78, 1.6]4 studies · 244 participantsModerate
Sodium valproate vs phenytoin monotherapy
Time to achieve 12‐month remission (seizure‐free period) Subgroup: generalised onset seizures (tonic‐clonic only) Range of · adults and children with newly‐onset focal onset or generalised tonic‐clonic seizures
Sodium valproate versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2018) · Cochrane
HR 0.96 [0.71, 1.29]4 studies · 270 participantsModerate
Carbamazepine vs phenobarbitone
Time to treatment failure (any reason related to treatment) All participants Range of · adults and children with newly onset focal or generalised epilepsy
Carbamazepine versus phenobarbitone monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2018) · Cochrane
HR 0.66 [0.5, 0.86]4 studies · 676 participantsModerate
Carbamazepine vs phenobarbitone
Time to treatment failure (any reason related to treatment) Subgroup: focal onset seizures Range of · adults and children with newly onset focal or generalised epilepsy
Carbamazepine versus phenobarbitone monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2018) · Cochrane
HR 0.66 [0.49, 0.88]4 studies · 520 participantsLow
Carbamazepine vs phenobarbitone
Time to treatment failure (any reason related to treatment) Subgroup: generalised onset tonic‐clonic seizures Range of · adults and children with newly onset focal or generalised epilepsy
Carbamazepine versus phenobarbitone monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2018) · Cochrane
HR 0.65 [0.35, 1.23]3 studies · 156 participantsLow
Carbamazepine vs phenobarbitone
Time to first seizure (post‐randomisation) All participants Range of · adults and children with newly onset focal or generalised epilepsy
Carbamazepine versus phenobarbitone monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2018) · Cochrane
HR 1.13 [0.93, 1.38]6 studies · 822 participantsModerate
Carbamazepine vs phenobarbitone
Time to first seizure (post‐randomisation) Subgroup: focal onset seizures Range of · adults and children with newly onset focal or generalised epilepsy
Carbamazepine versus phenobarbitone monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2018) · Cochrane
HR 1.31 [1.04, 1.66]6 studies · 584 participantsModerate
Carbamazepine vs phenobarbitone
Time to first seizure (post‐randomisation) Subgroup: generalised onset tonic‐clonic seizures Range of · adults and children with newly onset focal or generalised epilepsy
Carbamazepine versus phenobarbitone monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2018) · Cochrane
HR 0.8 [0.55, 1.15]5 studies · 238 participantsLow
Carbamazepine vs phenobarbitone
Time to achieve 12‐month remission (seizure‐free period) All participants Range of · adults and children with newly onset focal or generalised epilepsy
Carbamazepine versus phenobarbitone monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2018) · Cochrane
HR 1.09 [0.84, 1.4]4 studies · 683 participantsLow
Carbamazepine vs phenobarbitone
Time to achieve 12‐month remission (seizure‐free period) Subgroup: focal onset seizures Range of · adults and children with newly onset focal or generalised epilepsy
Carbamazepine versus phenobarbitone monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2018) · Cochrane
HR 0.92 [0.67, 1.25]4 studies · 525 participantsLow
Carbamazepine vs phenobarbitone
Time to achieve 12‐month remission (seizure‐free period) Subgroup: generalised onset tonic‐clonic seizures Range of · adults and children with newly onset focal or generalised epilepsy
Carbamazepine versus phenobarbitone monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review (2018) · Cochrane
HR 1.56 [0.99, 2.44]3 studies · 158 participantsLow
Summary of findings ‐ Lorazepam vs diazepam
Seizure cessation · Children with acute tonic‐clonic seizures
Drug management for acute tonic‐clonic convulsions including convulsive status epilepticus in children (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.08 [0.98, 1.2]3 studies · 439 participantsLow
Summary of findings ‐ Intranasal lorazepam vs intramuscular paraldehyde
Additional drugs required to terminate the seizure: 2 or more additional anticonvulsants required · Children with acute tonic‐clonic seizures
Drug management for acute tonic‐clonic convulsions including convulsive status epilepticus in children (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.38 [0.18, 0.81]1 study · 160 participantsLow
Summary of findings ‐ Intranasal lorazepam vs intramuscular paraldehyde
Seizure recurrence within 24 hours · Children with acute tonic‐clonic seizures
Drug management for acute tonic‐clonic convulsions including convulsive status epilepticus in children (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.73 [0.31, 1.71]1 study · 160 participantsLow
Summary of findings ‐ Intranasal lorazepam vs intramuscular paraldehyde
Incidence of admissions to the ICU · Children with acute tonic‐clonic seizures
Drug management for acute tonic‐clonic convulsions including convulsive status epilepticus in children (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings ‐ Intravenous lorazepam vs intravenous diazepam/intravenous phenytoin combination
Seizure cessation: within 10 minutes · Children with acute tonic‐clonic seizures
Drug management for acute tonic‐clonic convulsions including convulsive status epilepticus in children (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1 [0.98, 1.02]1 study · 178 participantsModerate
Summary of findings ‐ Intravenous lorazepam vs intravenous diazepam/intravenous phenytoin combination
Time from drug administration to stopping of seizures · Children with acute tonic‐clonic seizures
Drug management for acute tonic‐clonic convulsions including convulsive status epilepticus in children (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 178 participantsModerate
Summary of findings ‐ Intravenous lorazepam vs intravenous diazepam/intravenous phenytoin combination
Incidence of respiratory depression · Children with acute tonic‐clonic seizures
Drug management for acute tonic‐clonic convulsions including convulsive status epilepticus in children (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.78 [0.22, 2.82]1 study · 178 participantsModerate
Summary of findings ‐ Intravenous lorazepam vs intravenous diazepam/intravenous phenytoin combination
Additional drugs required to stop the seizure · Children with acute tonic‐clonic seizures
Drug management for acute tonic‐clonic convulsions including convulsive status epilepticus in children (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.42 [0.17, 1.04]1 study · 178 participantsModerate
Summary of findings ‐ Intravenous lorazepam vs intravenous diazepam/intravenous phenytoin combination
Seizure recurrence within 24 hours · Children with acute tonic‐clonic seizures
Drug management for acute tonic‐clonic convulsions including convulsive status epilepticus in children (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 178 participantsModerate
Summary of findings ‐ Intravenous lorazepam vs intravenous diazepam/intravenous phenytoin combination
Incidence of admissions to the ICU · Children with acute tonic‐clonic seizures
Drug management for acute tonic‐clonic convulsions including convulsive status epilepticus in children (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings ‐ Intravenous lorazepam vs intranasal lorazepam
Seizure cessation: within 10 minutes · Children with acute tonic‐clonic seizures
Drug management for acute tonic‐clonic convulsions including convulsive status epilepticus in children (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.07 [0.77, 1.49]1 study · 58 participantsModerate
Summary of findings ‐ Lorazepam vs diazepam
Time from drug administration to termination of seizures · Children with acute tonic‐clonic seizures
Drug management for acute tonic‐clonic convulsions including convulsive status epilepticus in children (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 80 participantsModerate
Summary of findings ‐ Intravenous lorazepam vs intranasal lorazepam
Time from drug administration to stopping of seizures · Children with acute tonic‐clonic seizures
Drug management for acute tonic‐clonic convulsions including convulsive status epilepticus in children (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 58 participantsModerate
Summary of findings ‐ Intravenous lorazepam vs intranasal lorazepam
Incidence of respiratory depression · Children with acute tonic‐clonic seizures
Drug management for acute tonic‐clonic convulsions including convulsive status epilepticus in children (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 141 participantsModerate
Summary of findings ‐ Intravenous lorazepam vs intranasal lorazepam
Additional drugs required to stop the seizure · Children with acute tonic‐clonic seizures
Drug management for acute tonic‐clonic convulsions including convulsive status epilepticus in children (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies