What do systematic reviews say?

Summary of findings table ‐ Planned hospital birth vs Planned home birth

• Planned hospital birth compared with planned home birth for pregnant women at low risk of complications 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 11 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings table ‐ Planned hospital birth vs Planned home birth

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Planned hospital birth changes baby not breastfed compared with planned home birth (very low certainty).

• Planned hospital birth compared with planned home birth for pregnant women at low risk of complications 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 1.84 [0.15, 23.38]
  1 study · 11 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings table ‐ Planned hospital birth vs Planned home birth

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Planned hospital birth compared with planned home birth for pregnant women at low risk of complications 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ Psychosocial interventions intended primarily to reduce antipsychotic use vs (Optimised) usual care

• Psychosocial interventions for reducing antipsychotic medication in care home residents 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  5 studies · 5 participants
  Low

Summary of findings table ‐ Psychosocial interventions intended primarily to reduce antipsychotic use vs (Optimised) usual care

• Psychosocial interventions for reducing antipsychotic medication in care home residents 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 3 participants
  High

Summary of findings table ‐ Psychosocial interventions intended primarily to reduce antipsychotic use vs (Optimised) usual care

• Psychosocial interventions for reducing antipsychotic medication in care home residents 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  5 studies · 7982 participants
  Low

Summary of findings table ‐ Psychosocial interventions intended primarily to reduce antipsychotic use vs (Optimised) usual care

• Psychosocial interventions for reducing antipsychotic medication in care home residents 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 2 participants
  Moderate

Summary of findings table ‐ Psychosocial interventions intended primarily to reduce antipsychotic use vs (Optimised) usual care

• Psychosocial interventions for reducing antipsychotic medication in care home residents 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 2 participants
  Low

Intervention not reported

The intervention showed no clear difference in smoking abstinence (low certainty).

• Interventions to reduce tobacco use in people experiencing homelessness 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.67 [0.16, 2.77]
  2 studies · 120 participants
  Low

More vs less intensive behavioral smoking cessation support

It is very uncertain whether more changes smoking abstinence compared with less intensive behavioral smoking cessation support (very low certainty).

• Interventions to reduce tobacco use in people experiencing homelessness 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.64 [1.01, 2.69]
  3 studies · 657 participants
  Very low

Multi‐issue support vs smoking cessation support only

It is very uncertain whether multi‐issue support changes smoking abstinence compared with smoking cessation support only (very low certainty).

• Interventions to reduce tobacco use in people experiencing homelessness 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.95 [0.35, 2.61]
  2 studies · 146 participants
  Very low

Supervised exercise therapy vs home exercises

• Supervised exercise therapy versus home‐based exercise therapy versus walking advice for intermittent claudication 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  8 studies · 351 participants
  Moderate

Supervised exercise therapy vs home exercises

• Supervised exercise therapy versus home‐based exercise therapy versus walking advice for intermittent claudication 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  7 studies · 322 participants
  Moderate

Supervised exercise therapy vs home exercises

• Supervised exercise therapy versus home‐based exercise therapy versus walking advice for intermittent claudication 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 68 participants
  Low

Supervised exercise therapy vs home exercises

• Supervised exercise therapy versus home‐based exercise therapy versus walking advice for intermittent claudication 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 68 participants
  Low

Supervised exercise therapy vs home exercises

• Supervised exercise therapy versus home‐based exercise therapy versus walking advice for intermittent claudication 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 62 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

The intervention showed no clear difference in perinatal mortality (low certainty).

• Home uterine monitoring for detecting preterm labour 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.22 [0.86, 1.72]
  2 studies · 2589 participants
  Low

Intervention not reported

The intervention leads to lower preterm birth less than 34 weeks' gestation (high certainty).

• Home uterine monitoring for detecting preterm labour 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.78 [0.62, 0.99]
  3 studies · 1596 participants
  High

Intervention not reported

The intervention showed no clear difference in antenatal hospital admissions (low certainty).

• Home uterine monitoring for detecting preterm labour 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.91 [0.74, 1.11]
  3 studies · 1494 participants
  Low

Intervention not reported

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes preterm birth less than 37 weeks' gestation (very low certainty).

• Home uterine monitoring for detecting preterm labour 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.85 [0.72, 1.01]
  8 studies · 4834 participants
  Very low